Effects of feedback reliability on event-related potentials in an arrow flanker task

被引：0

作者：

Jia, Meixue ^{[1
]}

Wang, Aili ^{[1
]}

Sui, Li ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Shanghai Sci & Technol, Sch Hlth Sci & Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China

[2] Univ Shanghai Sci & Technol, Sch Hlth Sci & Engn, 516 Jun Gong Rd, Shanghai 200093, Peoples R China

来源：

NEUROREPORT | 2023年 / 34卷 / 14期

关键词：

error-related negativity; feedback-related negativity; feedback reliability; P3; NEGATIVITY FRN; BRAIN ACTIVITY; ERRORS; COMPONENTS;

D O I：

10.1097/WNR.0000000000001944

中图分类号：

Q189 [神经科学];

学科分类号：

071006 ;

摘要：

The processing of feedback is essential for learning, error detection, and correction. However, the underlying mechanisms of the feedback's characteristics, such as its reliability, valence, and expectations in the processing of error information, are not completely clear. The two degrees of feedback reliability, reliable feedback and unreliable feedback, respectively, were established by manipulating the feedback valence. The time course of event-related potentials (ERP) during the arrow flanker tasks was used to investigate the effects of feedback reliability and responses on brain activity. Three ERP components, the error-related negativity (ERN), feedback-related negativity (FRN), and P3, respectively, were measured. The impacts of feedback reliability and responses on ERN, FRN, and P3 had a different profile. Specifically, ERN and P3 are associated with the responses but not the feedback reliability, while FRN is associated with feedback reliability and feedback expectations but not the responses. The ERN, FRN, and P3 reflect distinct cognitive processes in the processing of error information.

引用

页码：693 / 702

页数：10

共 24 条

[1] Feedback Valence Affects Auditory Perceptual Learning Independently of Feedback Probability [J].

Amitay, Sygal ;

Moore, David R. ;

Molloy, Katharine ;

Halliday, Lorna F. .

PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (05)

[2] Altered cingulate sub-region activation accounts for task-related dissociation in ERN amplitude as a function of obsessive-compulsive symptoms [J].

Cavanagh, James F. ;

Gruendler, Theo O. J. ;

Frank, Michael J. ;

Allen, John J. B. .

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2010, 48 (07) :2098-2109

[3] Why is there an ERN/Ne on correct trials? Response representations, stimulus-related components, and the theory of error-processing [J].

Coles, MGH ;

Scheffers, MK ;

Holroyd, CB .

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 56 (03) :173-189

[4] Differential effects of instructed and objective feedback reliability on feedback-related brain activity [J].

Di Gregorio, Francesco ;

Ernst, Benjamin ;

Steinhauser, Marco .

PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 56 (09)

[5] The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: Indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection? [J].

Dimoska, Aneta ;

Johnstone, Stuart J. ;

Barry, Robert J. .

BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2006, 62 (02) :98-112

[6] VISUAL PERCEPTUAL PROCESSING RATES AND BACKWARD AND FORWARD MASKING [J].

ERIKSEN, CW ;

ERIKSEN, BA .

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 89 (02) :306-&

[7] Effects of feedback reliability on feedback-related brain activity: A feedback valuation account [J].

Ernst, Benjamin ;

Steinhauser, Marco .

COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 18 (03) :596-608

[8] The feedback-related negativity (FRN) revisited: New insights into the localization, meaning and network organization [J].

Hauser, Tobias U. ;

Iannaccone, Reto ;

Staempfli, Philipp ;

Drechsler, Renate ;

Brandeis, Daniel ;

Walitza, Susanne ;

Brem, Silvia .

NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 84 :159-168

[9] Internal and external information in error processing [J].

Heldmann, Marcus ;

Ruesseler, Jascha ;

Muente, Thomas F. .

BMC NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 9 (1) :33

[10] Predictive information processing in the brain: Errors and response monitoring [J].

Hoffmann, Sven ;

Falkenstein, Michael .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 83 (02) :208-212

← 1 2 3 →