An integrated multi-criteria decision-making approach for evaluating e-waste mitigation strategies

被引:20
|
作者
Karuppiah, Koppiahraj [1 ]
Sankaranarayanan, Bathrinath [2 ]
机构
[1] SIMATS, Saveetha Sch Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Chennai 602105, Tamilnadu, India
[2] Kalasalingam Acad Res & Educ, Dept Mech Engn, Virudunagar 626126, Tamilnadu, India
关键词
Electronic waste (e-waste); Fermatean fuzzy set (FFS); DEMATEL; AHP; Data inventory; e-waste management; India; MANAGEMENT; BARRIERS; INDIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110420
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The need for effective electronic waste (e-waste) management practices has received wide attention due to increased societal awareness; however, the existence of challenges adds difficulties. This study identifies these critical e-waste management challenges through extensive literature reviews and targeted interaction with e-waste recycling units, and our work suggests strategies for e-waste mitigation. Then, an integrated framework of four methods - Fermatean fuzzy set (FFS), analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), and Technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) - calculates the weightage of the challenges, depicts causal interrelationships among the challenges, and ranks the mitigation strategies. For India, the top five most critical challenges to e-waste management practices include the booming informal sector, illegal import of e-waste, lack of technical expertise, absence of guidelines for e-waste recycling, and lack of data inventory. India's governmental establishment of an infrastructure for modern e-waste management represents the best potential strategy. Understanding the causal interrelationship and weightage of the challenges may help policymakers, industrial practitioners, and government agencies streamline e-waste management activities. & COPY; 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-criteria group decision making for evaluating the performance of e-waste recycling programs under uncertainty
    Wibowo, Santoso
    Deng, Hepu
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 40 : 127 - 135
  • [2] Integrated process capability and multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Cansu Dağsuyu
    Ulviye Polat
    Ali Kokangül
    Soft Computing, 2021, 25 : 7169 - 7180
  • [3] Integrated process capability and multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Dagsuyu, Cansu
    Polat, Ulviye
    Kokangul, Ali
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 25 (10) : 7169 - 7180
  • [4] Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making for evaluating mutual fund strategies
    Wang, Shin-Yun
    Lee, Cheng-Few
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2011, 43 (24) : 3405 - 3414
  • [5] An Integrated Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Evaluating Business Process Information Systems
    Kang, He-Yau
    Lee, Amy H., I
    Chan, Yao-Chuan
    MATHEMATICS, 2019, 7 (10)
  • [6] When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Saaty, Thomas L.
    Ergu, Daji
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (06) : 1171 - 1187
  • [7] An Integrated Approach of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Grey Theory for Evaluating Urban Public Transportation Systems
    Alkharabsheh, Ahmad
    Moslem, Sarbast
    Oubahman, Laila
    Duleba, Szabolcs
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (05) : 1 - 15
  • [8] A novel fuzzy hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for evaluating maintenance strategies in petrochemical industry
    Aghaee, Asghar
    Aghaee, Milad
    Fathi, Mohammad Reza
    Shoa'bin, Shirin
    Sobhani, Seyed Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF QUALITY IN MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING, 2021, 27 (02) : 351 - 365
  • [9] INTEGRITY MITIGATION PRIORITIZATION USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    Mehranfer, Mahsa
    Mejia, Juan
    Hassanien, Sherif
    Martin, James
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, 2019, VOL 7, 2019,
  • [10] Analysis of barriers in e-waste management in developing economy: an integrated multiple-criteria decision-making approach
    Jogendra Jangre
    Kanika Prasad
    Dharmendra Patel
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 72294 - 72308