Suicidal Ideation in South Korean: A Systematic Review

被引:0
作者
Been, Seonjae [1 ]
Byeon, Haewon [1 ]
机构
[1] Inje Univ, Dept Digital Antiaging Healthcare BK21, Gimhae 50834, South Korea
关键词
Suicidal ideation; Methodological quality; Meta; -analysis; Systematic review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: We systematically reviewed (evaluated methodological quality) meta-analysis studies on the sui-cidal ideation of South Koreans using a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews version 2 (AMSTAR-2) to present the ways for improving the quality of follow-up meta-analysis studies and suggest the direction of future studies.Methods: We analyzed 11 meta-analysis studies based on AMSTAR-2 criteria by collecting documents related to suicidal thoughts using seven electronic databases (DBPia, Scholar, KISS, KCI, RISS, KoreaEmbase, and National Assembly Electronic Library) from Jan 1, 2000 to Dec 3, 2022.Results: Among the 142 papers searched, we analyzed the final 11 selected studies. Not all analyzed meta -analysis studies conducted quality assessment and these studies omitted the list of excluded references and the adequacy of the literature search. Moreover, 54.5% of the analyzed studies (six out of eleven studies) did not present the effect of publication bias. Consequently, SOMETHING was critically low due to omissions in criti-cal domains.Conclusion: In all 11 studies analyzed, 2 or more of 7 critical domains were omitted, and the quality level was confirmed to be critically low. Therefore, future meta-analysis studies on suicidal ideation will have to include quality assessment and improve the quality of meta-analysis, such as testing bias effects.
引用
收藏
页码:1099 / 1107
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[31]  
신인수, 2011, [Korean Journal of Physical, Multiple, & Health Disabilities, 지체.중복.건강장애연구], V54, P157
[32]   A comparison of two assessment tools used in overviews of systematic reviews: ROBIS versus AMSTAR-2 [J].
Perry, R. ;
Whitmarsh, A. ;
Leach, V. ;
Davies, P. .
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
[33]   Publication bias in studies of an applied behavior-analytic intervention: An initial analysis [J].
Sham, Elyssa ;
Smith, Tristram .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2014, 47 (03) :663-678
[34]   AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both [J].
Shea, Beverley J. ;
Reeves, Barnaby C. ;
Wells, George ;
Thuku, Micere ;
Hamel, Candyce ;
Moran, Julian ;
Moher, David ;
Tugwell, Peter ;
Welch, Vivian ;
Kristjansson, Elizabeth ;
Henry, David A. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 358
[35]   ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions [J].
Sterne, Jonathan A. C. ;
Hernan, Miguel A. ;
Reeves, Barnaby C. ;
Savovic, Jelena ;
Berkman, Nancy D. ;
Viswanathan, Meera ;
Henry, David ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Ansari, Mohammed T. ;
Boutron, Isabelle ;
Carpenter, James R. ;
Chan, An-Wen ;
Churchill, Rachel ;
Deeks, Jonathan J. ;
Hrobjartsson, Asbjorn ;
Kirkham, Jamie ;
Juni, Peter ;
Loke, Yoon K. ;
Pigott, Theresa D. ;
Ramsay, Craig R. ;
Regidor, Deborah ;
Rothstein, Hannah R. ;
Sandhu, Lakhbir ;
Santaguida, Pasqualina L. ;
Schunemann, Holger J. ;
Shea, Beverly ;
Shrier, Ian ;
Tugwell, Peter ;
Turner, Lucy ;
Valentine, Jeffrey C. ;
Waddington, Hugh ;
Waters, Elizabeth ;
Wells, George A. ;
Whiting, Penny F. ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 355
[36]   An illustrated guide to the methods of meta-analysis [J].
Sutton, AJ ;
Abrams, KR ;
Jones, DR .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2001, 7 (02) :135-148
[37]   META-ANALYSIS - A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO RESEARCH INTEGRATION [J].
THACKER, SB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 259 (11) :1685-1689