Suicidal Ideation in South Korean: A Systematic Review

被引:0
作者
Been, Seonjae [1 ]
Byeon, Haewon [1 ]
机构
[1] Inje Univ, Dept Digital Antiaging Healthcare BK21, Gimhae 50834, South Korea
关键词
Suicidal ideation; Methodological quality; Meta; -analysis; Systematic review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: We systematically reviewed (evaluated methodological quality) meta-analysis studies on the sui-cidal ideation of South Koreans using a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews version 2 (AMSTAR-2) to present the ways for improving the quality of follow-up meta-analysis studies and suggest the direction of future studies.Methods: We analyzed 11 meta-analysis studies based on AMSTAR-2 criteria by collecting documents related to suicidal thoughts using seven electronic databases (DBPia, Scholar, KISS, KCI, RISS, KoreaEmbase, and National Assembly Electronic Library) from Jan 1, 2000 to Dec 3, 2022.Results: Among the 142 papers searched, we analyzed the final 11 selected studies. Not all analyzed meta -analysis studies conducted quality assessment and these studies omitted the list of excluded references and the adequacy of the literature search. Moreover, 54.5% of the analyzed studies (six out of eleven studies) did not present the effect of publication bias. Consequently, SOMETHING was critically low due to omissions in criti-cal domains.Conclusion: In all 11 studies analyzed, 2 or more of 7 critical domains were omitted, and the quality level was confirmed to be critically low. Therefore, future meta-analysis studies on suicidal ideation will have to include quality assessment and improve the quality of meta-analysis, such as testing bias effects.
引用
收藏
页码:1099 / 1107
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis [J].
Akobeng, AK .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2005, 90 (08) :845-848
[2]  
문동규, 2012, [Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 청소년학연구], V19, P59
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, KOREAN J SOCIAL WELF
[4]  
안세영, 2015, [The Korean Journal of School Psychology, 한국심리학회지:학교], V12, P385
[5]  
Egger M., 2001, Systematic reviews in health care: Meta-analysis in context
[6]   How to do a meta-analysis [J].
Field, Andy P. ;
Gillett, Raphael .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 63 (03) :665-694
[7]  
Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, 2022, REC 5 YEARS 2017 202
[8]  
Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, 2019, PREP MEAS ASS AD OUT
[9]   Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates [J].
Hedges, Larry V. ;
Tipton, Elizabeth ;
Johnson, Matthew C. .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2010, 1 (01) :39-65
[10]   Opportunities and barriers in the implementation of protected area management: a qualitative meta-analysis of case studies from European protected areas [J].
Hirschnitz-Garbers, Martin ;
Stoll-Kleemann, Susanne .
GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 177 :321-334