Developing a Robotic Surgery Curriculum: Selection of Virtual Reality Drills for Content Alignment

被引:9
作者
Alterio, Rodrigo E. [1 ]
Nagaraj, Madhuri B. [1 ]
Scott, Daniel J. [1 ,2 ]
Tellez, Juan [1 ]
Radi, Imad [1 ]
Baker, Hayley B. [1 ]
Zeh, Herbert J. [1 ]
Polanco, Patricio M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Southwestern Dallas, Dept Surg, Dallas, TX USA
[2] Univ Texas Southwestern Dallas, Simulat Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
Content alignment; Curriculum development; Robotic surgery; SimNow; Simulation; Validity evidence; TRAINING-PROGRAM; VALIDITY; FACE; CONSTRUCT; SIMULATOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2022.11.019
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Despite the importance of simulation-based training for robotic surgery, there is no consensus about its training curricula. Recently, a virtual reality (VR) platform (SimNow, Intuitive, Inc) was introduced with 33 VR drills but without evidence of their validity. As part of our creating a new robotic VR curriculum, we assessed the drills' validity through content mapping and the alignment between learning goals and drill content.Methods: Three robotically trained surgeons content-mapped all 33 drills for how well the drills incorporated 15 surgery skills and also rated the drills' difficulty, usefulness, rele-vance, and uniqueness. Drills were added to the new curriculum based on consensus about ratings and historic learner data. The drills were grouped according to similar skill sets and arranged in order of complexity.Results: The 33 drills were judged to have 12/15 surgery skills as primary goals and 13/15 as secondary goals. Twenty of the 33 drills were selected for inclusion in the new curriculum; these had 11/15 skills as primary goals and 11/15 as secondary goals. However, skills regarding energy sources, atraumatic handling, blunt dissection, fine dissection, and running suturing were poorly represented in the drills. Three previously validated inani-mate drills were added to the curriculum to address lacking skill domains.Conclusions: We identified 20 of the 33 SimNow drills as a foundation for a robotic surgery curriculum based on content-oriented evidence. We added 3 other drills to address iden-tified gaps in drill content.(c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:726 / 732
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [11] A call for the utilization of consensus standards in the surgical education literature
    Korndorffer, James R., Jr.
    Kasten, Steven J.
    Downing, Steven M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 199 (01) : 99 - 104
  • [12] Which skills really matter? proving face, content, and construct validity for a commercial robotic simulator
    Lyons, Calvin
    Goldfarb, David
    Jones, Stephen L.
    Badhiwala, Niraj
    Miles, Brian
    Link, Richard
    Dunkin, Brian J.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (06): : 2020 - 2030
  • [13] Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents
    Martin, JA
    Regehr, G
    Reznick, R
    MacRae, H
    Murnaghan, J
    Hutchison, C
    Brown, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 84 (02) : 273 - 278
  • [14] Feasibility, effectiveness and transferability of a novel mastery-based virtual reality robotic training platform for general surgery residents
    Radi, Imad
    Tellez, Juan C.
    Alterio, Rodrigo E.
    Scott, Daniel J.
    Sankaranarayanan, Ganesh
    Nagaraj, Madhuri B.
    Hogg, Melissa E.
    Zeh, Herbert J.
    Polanco, Patricio M.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (10): : 7279 - 7287
  • [15] Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for robotic training using a global assessment tool
    Ramos, Patrick
    Montez, Jeremy
    Tripp, Adrian
    Ng, Casey K.
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    Hung, Andrew J.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 113 (05) : 836 - 842
  • [16] Association of Mentorship and a Formal Robotic Proficiency Skills Curriculum With Subsequent Generations' Learning Curve and Safety for Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Rice, MaryJoe K.
    Hodges, Jacob C.
    Bellon, Johanna
    Borrebach, Jeffrey
    Al Abbas, Amr, I
    Hamad, Ahmad
    Knab, L. Mark
    Moser, A. James
    Zureikat, Amer H.
    Zeh, Herbert J.
    Hogg, Melissa E.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2020, 155 (07) : 607 - 615
  • [17] Proving the Effectiveness of the Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery (FRS) Skills Curriculum A Single-blinded, Multispecialty, Multi-institutional Randomized Control Trial
    Satava, Richard M.
    Stefanidis, Dimitrios
    Levy, Jeffrey S.
    Smith, Roger
    Martin, John R.
    Monfared, Sara
    Timsina, Lava R.
    Darzi, Ara Wardkes
    Moglia, Andrea
    Brand, Timothy C.
    Dorin, Ryan P.
    Dumon, Kristoffel R.
    Francone, Todd D.
    Georgiou, Evangelos
    Goh, Alvin C.
    Marcet, Jorge E.
    Martino, Martin A.
    Sudan, Ranjan
    Vale, Justin
    Gallagher, Anthony G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 272 (02) : 384 - 392
  • [18] Trends in the Adoption of Robotic Surgery for Common Surgical Procedures
    Sheetz, Kyle H.
    Claflin, Jake
    Dimick, Justin B.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (01)
  • [19] Robotic gastrointestinal surgery: learning curve, educational programs and outcomes
    Vining, Charles C.
    Skowron, Kinga B.
    Hogg, Melissa E.
    [J]. UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2021, 73 (03) : 799 - 814