The relevance of international restoration principles for ecosystem restoration practice in Rwanda

被引:1
作者
Frietsch, Marina [1 ,2 ]
Fischer, Joern [1 ]
Kaplin, Beth A. [2 ,3 ]
Martin-Lopez, Berta [1 ]
机构
[1] Leuphana Univ Lueneburg, Social Ecol Syst Inst, Sch Sustainabil, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
[2] Univ Rwanda, Ctr Excellence Biodivers & Nat Resource Management, Kigali 4285, Rwanda
[3] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Environm, Boston, MA 02125 USA
关键词
ecosystem restoration; forest landscape restoration; Q-methodology; social-ecological systems; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; CONSERVATION; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1111/rec.14085
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The restoration of degraded ecosystems is considered a key strategy to contribute to ecological integrity and human well-being. To support restoration practice, 10 "Principles to guide the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration 2021-2030" were conceived through a consultative process and put forward by a group of leading international restoration actors. The extent to which these principles can inform successful restoration activities on the ground, however, remains largely unknown. Using a combination of qualitative and quantitative data collection methods, we probed 32 stakeholders who plan, manage, and implement restoration in Rwanda to elicit which factors they perceive as most important for successful restoration based on the UN Decade principles. Using the Q-methodology, we discovered that participants overall agreed that the UN Decade principles are relevant to inform successful ecosystem restoration in the study area. Further, the Q-study revealed three distinct groups of stakeholders with different priorities in terms of opinions on restoration aims, stakeholder involvement, and relevant spatial scales. Based on semi-structured interviews, we identified four considerations for successful restoration that require special attention in future restoration interventions in the study area: (1) restoring historical conditions, (2) collecting baseline data, (3) increasing local communities' sense of ownership, and (4) pursuing a long-term vision for restoration activities. To address these considerations and thereby harvest the potential of ecosystem restoration to benefit both people and nature in the long run, diverse stakeholders with different priorities for restoration need to come together to discuss possible differences in their perceived priorities, perspectives, and approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 71 条
[61]  
Sewell A., 2020, Global Restoration Commitments database
[62]  
Sigman E, 2021, ECOL RESTOR, V39, P27
[63]   Forest landscape restoration: building on the past for future success [J].
Stanturf, John A. .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2021, 29 (04)
[64]   Forest Restoration Paradigms [J].
Stanturf, John A. ;
Palik, Brian J. ;
Williams, Mary I. ;
Dumroese, R. Kasten ;
Madsen, Palle .
JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY, 2014, 33 :S161-S194
[65]   Beyond ecology: ecosystem restoration as a process for social-ecological transformation [J].
Tedesco, Anazelia M. ;
Lopez-Cubillos, Sofia ;
Chazdon, Robin ;
Rhodes, Jonathan R. ;
Archibald, Carla L. ;
Perez-Hammerle, Katharina-Victoria ;
Brancalion, Pedro H. S. ;
Wilson, Kerrie A. ;
Oliveira, Mariana ;
Correa, Diego F. ;
Ota, Liz ;
Morrison, Tiffany H. ;
Possingham, Hugh P. ;
Mills, Morena ;
Santos, Fabiane C. ;
Dean, Angela J. .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2023, 38 (07) :643-653
[66]   Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The Multiple Evidence Base Approach [J].
Tengo, Maria ;
Brondizio, Eduardo S. ;
Elmqvist, Thomas ;
Malmer, Pernilla ;
Spierenburg, Marja .
AMBIO, 2014, 43 (05) :579-591
[67]  
United Nations Environment Programme [UNEP], 2021, Becoming #Generation Restoration: Ecosystem restoration for people, nature and climate
[68]  
Walker B., 2006, Resilience thinking: Sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world
[69]  
Watts S., 2012, Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method & interpretation, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446251911
[70]   When and how to use Q methodology to understand perspectives in conservation research [J].
Zabala, Aiora ;
Sandbrook, Chris ;
Mukherjee, Nibedita .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2018, 32 (05) :1185-1194