Examining the differences of perceptions and experience with online health information accessibility between deaf and hearing individuals: A qualitative study

被引:1
作者
Chandanabhumma, P. Paul [1 ,5 ]
Ratakonda, Samantha [2 ]
Panko, Tiffany [3 ]
Cuculick, Jessica [3 ]
Hauser, Peter [3 ]
Paasche-Orlow, Michael K. [4 ]
Fetters, Michael D. [1 ]
Mckee, Michael M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Family Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Tulane Univ, Sch Med, New Orleans, LA USA
[3] Rochester Inst Technol, Natl Tech Inst Deaf, Rochester, NY USA
[4] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Tufts Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Family Med, 1018 Fuller St, Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA
关键词
Health literacy; Deaf cultural diversity; Qualitative research; Deaf and hard of hearing patients; Online health information accessibility; Health disparities; LITERACY; PEOPLE; COMMUNICATION; ACCESS; TEXT; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2024.108169
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: Describe and compare the experiences and preferences of Deaf and hearing individuals with different levels of health literacy in accessing, interpreting, and acting upon online health information. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 Deaf and 10 hearing participants with high and low health literacy from three healthcare sites. We conducted thematic analysis of the transcripts to explore information navigation experiences, information sources and dissemination preferences. Results: We found thematic differences between Deaf and hearing participants with high and low health literacy in terms of information needs, information search experiences, information search perceptions, and preferred information dissemination approaches. Relative to hearing counterparts, Deaf participants were more likely to encounter challenges in accessing and understanding online information. Deaf participants with low health literacy were more likely to rely on visual graphics to support their understanding of the information than those with high health literacy. Deaf participants advocated for tailored approaches to disseminate health information to Deaf communities. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that differences in online health information navigation experiences and accessibility may inform disparities in health literacy outcomes between Deaf and hearing individuals. Practice implications: Online health information should be presented in a manner accessible to Deaf community members.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Deafness might damage your health
    Alexander, Andrew
    Ladd, Paddy
    Powell, Steve
    [J]. LANCET, 2012, 379 (9820) : 979 - 981
  • [2] If online learning works for you, what about deaf students? Emerging challenges of online learning for deaf and hearing-impaired students during COVID-19: a literature review
    Aljedaani, Wajdi
    Krasniqi, Rrezarta
    Aljedaani, Sanaa
    Mkaouer, Mohamed Wiem
    Ludi, Stephanie
    Al-Raddah, Khaled
    [J]. UNIVERSAL ACCESS IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY, 2023, 22 (03) : 1027 - 1046
  • [3] Disparities in health literacy during the COVID-19 pandemic between the hearing and deaf communities
    Almusawi, Hashemiah
    Alasim, Khalid
    BinAli, Sumaya
    Alherz, Mohammad
    [J]. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2021, 119
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, AMERICANS DISABILITI
  • [5] Braun V., 2019, APA HDB RES METHODS, DOI [10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_103-1, 10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4103, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4103]
  • [6] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352
  • [7] Using Gaze Tracking as a Research Tool in the Deaf Health Literacy and Access to Health Information Project: Protocol for a Multisite Mixed Methods Study and Preliminary Results
    Champlin, Sara
    Cuculick, Jessica
    Hauser, Peter C.
    Wyse, Kelley
    McKee, Michael M.
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2021, 10 (09):
  • [8] Creswell J. W., 2007, Designing and conducting mixed methods research
  • [9] Dedoose, 2021, Cloud application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data
  • [10] The 3 Cs of Content, Context, and Concepts: A Practical Approach to Recording Unstructured Field Observations
    Fetters, Michael D.
    Rubinstein, Ellen B.
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2019, 17 (06) : 554 - 560