The roles of suprasegmental features in assessing paired speaking tasks in high-stakes language assessment

被引:3
作者
Choi, Sungeun [1 ,2 ]
Kang, Okim [1 ]
机构
[1] No Arizona Univ, Dept English, 705 S Beaver St, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[2] Dept English, 705 S Beaver St, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
关键词
Speaking assessment; Pronunciation; Paired interaction; L2; communication; ORAL PROFICIENCY; TONE CHOICE; FLUENCY; PROSODY; INTONATION; EXPERIENCE; DISCOURSE; JUDGMENTS; LEARNERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.system.2023.103183
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In the realm of language assessment, the speaking abilities of second language (L2) speakers in communicative contexts have garnered increasing attention, as English serves as a lingua franca in our globalized world. In oral communication, suprasegmental features play a crucial role in shaping interactions. However, our comprehension of how proficient L2 speakers employ these suprasegmentals, particularly in the context of assessment, has been limited. This study investigated the utilization of suprasegmental features by L2 speakers, namely rate, pause, prominence, and pitch, to construct interactions and examined their connection to paired performance in a high-stakes oral assessment. This assessment is evaluated based on five criteria: Sensitivity to Situation, Language Use, Content Delivery, Discourse Management, and Engaging with Interaction. The study analyzed twenty-five paired interactions from the Cambridge English Language Assessment. The results, derived from mixed-effect modeling and stepwise regression analyses, highlight that rate and pitch measures are significant predictors of overall speaking scores. Furthermore, in-depth analysis identified specific suprasegmental features that contributed to the scores of each criterion: Sensitivity to Situation (rate), Language Use (pitch), Content Delivery (pitch), and Engaging with Interaction (rate). The findings of this study hold significant implications for language learning, speaking assessment, and pedagogy.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Aijmer K., 1996, Conversational routines in English:Convention and creativity, P80
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, IBM SPSS Statistics for Mac (Version 28.0) [Computer software]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, The Music of Everyday Speech: Prosody and Discourse Analysis
[5]  
Bachman L. F., 1990, Fundamental considerations in language testing
[6]   The role of intonation in emotional expressions [J].
Bänziger, T ;
Scherer, KR .
SPEECH COMMUNICATION, 2005, 46 (3-4) :252-267
[7]  
Bartels Christine., 1999, The intonation of English statements and questions: A compositional interpretation
[8]  
Barth-Weingarten Dagmar., 2010, Prosody in interaction
[9]  
Boersma P., 2020, Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3.82) Computer software
[10]  
Brazil D., 1997, COMMUNICATIVE VALUE