Evidence of automated vehicle safety's influence on people's acceptance of the automated driving technology

被引:6
作者
Wang, Song [1 ]
Li, Zhixia [2 ]
Wang, Yi [3 ]
Zhao, Wenjing [4 ]
Liu, Tangzhi [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Traff & Transportat, Chongqing 400074, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Civil & Architectural Engn & Construct Manage, Cincinnati, OH 40221 USA
[3] Univ Louisville, Dept Commun, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[4] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Automated vehicles; Acceptance; Safety; Traffic conflicts; Conflict severity; TRUST; EXPERIENCE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.aap.2023.107381
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Existing studies identified targeted audiences showing increases in Automated Vehicles (AV) acceptance after experiencing automated driving. However, there is still uncertainty regarding the reasons. Although some studies cited safety as the primary reason, there is no objective evidence from safety performance in verifying its impact on AV acceptance. This study contributes to the literature by quantitatively revealing why AV acceptance is changed after experiencing automated driving via a Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) method and objectively validating that safety is the primary factor in determining AV acceptance. Sixty drivers completed driving tasks on a driving simulator under Levels 0, 4, 3, and 2 and survey questions in between. As a result, the safety-related perceptions of AV were identified as reasons for affecting AV acceptance. Particularly, the evaluation of traffic conflicts and conflict severity validates the results from SEM, proving that safety is the primary and significant reason for influencing AV acceptance.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Altman Alyssa, 2022, Automotive WorldJanuary 10
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, SAE International, V4970, P1
  • [3] Driver-initiated take-overs during critical braking maneuvers in automated driving - The role of time headway, traction usage, and trust in automation
    Becker, Sandra
    Brandenburg, Stefan
    Thuring, Manfred
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2022, 174
  • [4] User acceptance of automated public transport Valence of an autonomous minibus experience
    Bernhard, Christoph
    Oberfeld, Daniel
    Hoffmann, Christian
    Weismueller, Dirk
    Hecht, Heiko
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2020, 70 : 109 - 123
  • [5] The role of system description for conditionally automated vehicles
    Bloemacher, Katja
    Noecker, Gerhard
    Huff, Markus
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2018, 54 : 159 - 170
  • [6] Exploring the who, what, when, where, and why of automated vehicle disengagements
    Boggs, Alexandra M.
    Arvin, Ramin
    Khattak, Asad J.
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2020, 136
  • [7] An Open Road Evaluation of a Self-Driving Vehicle Human-Machine Interface Designed for Visually Impaired Users
    Brinkley, Julian
    Posadas, Brianna
    Sherman, Imani
    Daily, Shaundra B.
    Gilbert, Juan E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2019, 35 (11) : 1018 - 1032
  • [8] Brown T. A., 2006, Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research
  • [9] Psychosocial factors associated with intended use of automated vehicles: A simulated driving study
    Buckley, Lisa
    Kaye, Sherrie-Anne
    Pradhan, Anuj K.
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2018, 115 : 202 - 208
  • [10] Older Drivers' Experience With Automated Vehicle Technology: Interim Analysis of a Demonstration Study
    Classen, Sherrilene
    Mason, Justin
    Wersal, James
    Sisiopiku, Virginia
    Rogers, Jason
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE CITIES, 2020, 2