Robot-assisted repair of hiatal hernia: Advantages and disadvantages in comparison to conventional laparoscopic repair: A literature review

被引:1
作者
Pelzner, Kim [1 ]
Mueller, Dolores T. [1 ]
Fuchs, Claudia [2 ]
Maus, Martin [2 ]
Bruns, Christiane J. [1 ]
Fuchs, Hans F. [1 ]
Leers, Jessica M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Gen Visceral Tumor & Transplantat Surg, Cologne, Germany
[2] Evangel Hosp Kalk, Dept Funct Upper GI Surg, Buchforststr 2, D-51103 Cologne, Germany
关键词
Antireflux surgery; GERD; hiatal hernia repair; laparoscopic surgery; robotic surgery; upside-down stomach; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; ERGONOMICS; PERFORMANCE; STANDARD;
D O I
10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_15_23
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The laparoscopic fundoplication has proven to be the standard technique of antireflux surgery and hiatal hernia (HH) repair over the last decade. However, robot-assisted surgery is more and more implemented in daily practice. Several studies have proven the feasibility and safety of robot-assisted HH repair and antireflux surgery. Both approaches seem to be similar regarding perioperative and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, postoperative symptoms, and quality of life, as well as objective assessment of gastric acid exposure. Nevertheless, high total costs as well as a considerably longer total operating time of robot-assisted surgery need to be considered. The role of robot-assisted surgery in complex cases is promising but needs to be evaluated. Eventually, the decision regarding the technique used should be based on the surgeon's discretion and experience.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 80
页数:4
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: Challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery
    Ballantyne, GH
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2002, 12 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [2] Surgical technology and the ergonomics of laparoscopic instruments
    Berguer, R
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1998, 12 (05): : 458 - 462
  • [3] An ergonomic comparison of in-line vs pistol-grip handle configuration in a laparoscopic grasper
    Berguer, R
    Gerber, S
    Kilpatrick, G
    Beckley, D
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1998, 12 (06): : 805 - 808
  • [4] Ergonomics in Surgery: A Review
    Catanzarite, Tatiana
    Tan-Kim, Jasmine
    Whitcomb, Emily L.
    Menefee, Shawn
    [J]. FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 24 (01): : 1 - 12
  • [5] Are gamers better laparoscopic surgeons? Impact of gaming skills on laparoscopic performance in "Generation Y" students
    Datta, Rabi
    Chon, Seung-Hun
    Dratsch, Thomas
    Timmermann, Ferdinand
    Mueller, Luise
    Plum, Patrick Sven
    Haneder, Stefan
    dos Santos, Daniel Pinto
    Spath, Martin Richard
    Wahba, Roger
    Bruns, Christiane Josephine
    Kleinert, Robert
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (08):
  • [6] Feasibility and Acceptance of a Robotic Surgery Ergonomic Training Program
    Franasiak, Jason
    Craven, Renatta
    Mosaly, Prithima
    Gehrig, Paola A.
    [J]. JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2014, 18 (04)
  • [7] Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopy
    Hemal, AK
    Srinivas, M
    Charles, AR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2001, 15 (05) : 499 - 503
  • [8] Solving the surgeon ergonomic crisis with surgical exosuit
    Liu, Shanglei
    Hemming, Daniel
    Luo, Ran B.
    Reynolds, Jessica
    Delong, Jonathan C.
    Sandler, Bryan J.
    Jacobsen, Garth R.
    Horgan, Santiago
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (01): : 236 - 244
  • [9] Measuring Ergonomic Risk in Operating Surgeons by Using Wearable Technology
    Meltzer, Andrew J.
    Hallbeck, M. Susan
    Morrow, Melissa M.
    Lowndes, Bethany R.
    Davila, Victor J.
    Stone, William M.
    Money, Samuel R.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2020, 155 (05) : 444 - 446
  • [10] Montero PN, 2011, AM SURGEON, V77, P73