Analysis of CO2 hydrate formation from flue gas mixtures in a bubble column reactor

被引:16
作者
Bhati, Awan [1 ]
Kar, Aritra [1 ]
Bahadur, Vaibhav [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Walker Dept Mech Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
CO2 hydrate formation; Bubble column reactor; Flue gas; Conversion factor; Carbon capture and sequestration; CARBON-DIOXIDE CAPTURE; METHANE HYDRATE; STORAGE; CH4; SEQUESTRATION; DISSOCIATION; RECOVERY; IMPACT; TBAF;
D O I
10.1016/j.seppur.2023.125261
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Gigascale carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) is increasingly seen as essential to meeting the targets of the Paris Agreement. As an alternative to conventional CCS approaches, carbon dioxide (CO2) hydrates have received attention as materials which can enable new approaches to carbon capture as well as carbon sequestration. CO2 hydrates (ice-like materials of CO2 and water) form at medium pressures (<400 psi) and temperatures of >0 C from a water-CO2 mixture. Bubble column reactors (BCR) have been studied as a preferred way of forming CO2 hydrates. This study uses an inhouse, recently-developed modeling framework to predict performance of a BCR for CO2 hydrate formation from flue gas (CO2/N-2), and pure CO2 streams. We highlight and analyze specific aspects of hydrate formation that are important for CO2 sequestration, and for CO2 separation/capture. In particular, two performance parameters are analyzed: i) gas consumption rate for hydrate formation (normalized with reactor volume), and ii) fraction of CO2 that converts to CO2 hydrates in a single pass (conversion factor). The first metric quantifies the overall productivity of a BCR by obtaining the net CO2 that can be sequestered or separated from the flue gas stream. The second metric relates to the efficiency of the system by quantifying the need for recirculation and the quality of the exit stream after a single pass. Extensive parametric analysis is conducted to study the influence of pressure, temperature, CO2 mole fraction at inlet, gas flow rate and reactor geometry on hydrate formation. Across the range of simulations conducted in this study, the highest gas consumption rate per unit reactor volume was 28.9 ton/yr/m3 and the highest conversion factor was 67.8 %. Both parameters increase with increasing pressure, decreasing temperature and increasing inlet mole fraction of CO2. Increasing gas flow rate increases the gas consumption rate (i.e., hydrate formation rate) but reduces the conversion factor. This suggests that the overall productivity of BCRs increases with gas flow rate at the expense of its efficiency. Reduced efficiency increases recirculation-related costs and high flow rate increases compression and cooling costs. For flue gas, increasing the reactor volume by increasing the height or diameter increases conversion factor but significantly reduces the gas consumption rate per unit reactor volume. For pure CO2, increasing the reactor height increases the conversion factor without changing the volumetric gas consumption rate. Decreasing the diameter increases volumetric gas consumption rate without changing the conversion factor. These findings suggest that compact reactors are more suitable for CO2 hydrate slurry production (on a volumetric basis), while larger reactors are suitable for CO2 separation/capture applications. Overall, this study provides a basis for the design and operation of BCRs for CO2 hydrates-based CCS applications.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hydrate formation from clay bound water for CO2 storage
    Sun, Youhong
    Jiang, Shuhui
    Li, Shengli
    Wang, Xiaochu
    Peng, Saiyu
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2021, 406 (406)
  • [42] Hydrate-based CO2 capture from flue gas in constant pressure process with the presence of THF
    Yang, Mingjun
    Zhou, Hang
    Wang, Pengfei
    Li, Nan
    Song, Yongchen
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 142 : 3939 - 3943
  • [43] Molecular and Pore Structures of Coal on CO2 Hydrate Formation: Insights from the Adsorption-Hydrate Hybrid Process
    Gao, Bin
    Wu, Caifang
    Zhao, Jianzhong
    Song, Yu
    Gao, Qiang
    Fang, Xiaojie
    Zhang, Chi
    Wang, Fangfang
    Guan, Jian
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2024, 38 (22) : 22315 - 22329
  • [44] Biosequestration of atmospheric CO2 and flue gas-containing CO2 by microalgae
    Cheah, Wai Yan
    Show, Pau Loke
    Chang, Jo-Shu
    Ling, Tau Chuan
    Juan, Joon Ching
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 184 : 190 - 201
  • [45] Influence of amino acids on gas hydrate formation and dissociation kinetics using flue gas (CO2 + N2 mixture) in silica sand under saline/non-saline conditions for CO2 sequestration
    Pagar, Eti
    Burla, Sai Kiran
    Kumar, Vimal
    Veluswamy, Hari Prakash
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 367
  • [46] On the Significance of Hydrate Formation/Dissociation during CO2 Injection in Depleted Gas Reservoirs
    Indina, V.
    Fernandes, B. R. B.
    Delshad, M.
    Farajzadeh, R.
    Sepehrnoori, K.
    SPE JOURNAL, 2024, 29 (12): : 7194 - 7213
  • [47] Capture of carbon dioxide from flue or fuel gas mixtures by clathrate crystallization in a silica gel column
    Adeyemo, Adebola
    Kumar, Rajnish
    Linga, Praveen
    Ripmeester, John
    Englezos, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2010, 4 (03) : 478 - 485
  • [48] Effect of Flue Gas Impurities on CO2 Capture Performance from Flue Gas at Coal-fired Power Stations by Vacuum Swing Adsorption
    Zhang, Jun
    Xiao, Penny
    Li, Gang
    Webley, Paul A.
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 1115 - 1122
  • [49] Application of carbon fibre composites to CO2 capture from flue gas
    Thiruvenkatachari, Ramesh
    Su, Shi
    Yu, Xin Xiang
    Bae, Jun-Seok
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2013, 13 : 191 - 200
  • [50] Absorption of CO2 by Tetra-n-Butylammonium Bromide Semiclathrate Hydrate Slurries in a Bubble Column with Temperature Swing
    Komatsu, Hiroyuki
    Okoshi, Hideki
    Ezure, Ryosuke
    Tajima, Hideo
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2024, 63 (22) : 9998 - 10008