Validation of the 2018 FIGO Staging System for Predicting the Prognosis of Patients With Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer

被引:8
作者
Long, Xingtao [1 ]
He, Misi [1 ]
Yang, Lingling [2 ]
Zou, Dongling [1 ]
Wang, Dong [1 ]
Chen, Yuemei [1 ]
Zhou, Qi [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Chongqing Canc Hosp, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Sch Med, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Univ, Chongqing Canc Hosp, 181 Hanyu Rd, Chongqing 400000, Peoples R China
关键词
International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; FIGO; staging; cervical cancer; prognosis; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; CARCINOMA; MANAGEMENT; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1177/11795549221146652
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background:Risk stratification of patients with cervical cancer accompanied by positive lymph nodes (stage IIIC) (the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] new staging system) yields a clinically heterogeneous group. In this study, we investigated the prognostic performance of the 2018 FIGO staging system for stage IIIC cervical cancer. Methods:The study included patients with stage III cervical cancer based on the 2018 FIGO staging system, who visited Chongqing University Cancer Hospital between January 2011 and December 2014. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to evaluate overall survival (OS), which was compared using the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used for multivariable analysis. Results:A total of 418 patients were eligible for analysis. The 5-year OS was 54.1% for stage IIIC1, 43.3% for stage IIIA, 40.6% for stage IIIB, and 23.1% for stage IIIC2 (P < .001). Multivariable analysis revealed that compared with stages IIIA (hazard ratio [HR] 1.432, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.867-2.366, P = .161) and IIIB (HR 1.261, 95% CI 0.871-1.827, P = .219), stage IIIC1 cancer was not significantly associated with an increased mortality risk. Stage IIIC2 was independently associated with an increased mortality risk compared with stages IIIA (HR 2.958, 95% CI 1.757-4.983, P < .001) and IIIB (HR 2.606, 95% CI 1.752-3.877, P < .001). We stratified patients with stage IIIC1 based on the T stage. The 5-year OS was significantly longer in patients with stage IIIC1 (T1) than in those with stage IIIA (P = .004) or IIIB (P < .001). Analysis of multiple factors revealed that the mortality risk was 2.75-fold higher in patients with stage IIIC1pN>2 than in patients with stage IIIC1pN1-2 (HR 2.753, 95% CI 1.527-4.965, P = .001). Conclusions:Patients with stage IIIC1 cervical cancer showed heterogeneous clinical characteristics that reflected variable prognoses, depending on the T stage and the extent of pelvic lymph node metastases.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   IDENTIFICATION OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS AND RISK GROUPS IN PATIENTS FOUND TO HAVE NODAL METASTASIS AT THE TIME OF RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR EARLY-STAGE SQUAMOUS CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX [J].
ALVAREZ, RD ;
SOONG, SJ ;
KINNEY, WK ;
REID, GC ;
SCHRAY, MF ;
PODRATZ, KC ;
MORLEY, GW ;
SHINGLETON, HM .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1989, 35 (02) :130-135
[2]   Should the Number of Metastatic Pelvic Lymph Nodes Be Integrated into the 2018 Figo Staging Classification of Early Stage Cervical Cancer? [J].
Anchora, Luigi Pedone ;
Carbone, Vittoria ;
Gallotta, Valerio ;
Fanfani, Francesco ;
Cosentino, Francesco ;
Turco, Luigi Carlo ;
Fedele, Camilla ;
Bizzarri, Nicolo ;
Scambia, Giovanni ;
Ferrandina, Gabriella .
CANCERS, 2020, 12 (06) :1-12
[3]   Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis [J].
Arbyn, Marc ;
Weiderpass, Elisabete ;
Bruni, Laia ;
de Sanjose, Silvia ;
Saraiya, Mona ;
Ferlay, Jacques ;
Bray, Freddie .
LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2020, 8 (02) :E191-E203
[4]   FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and corpus uteri [J].
Belhadj, H. ;
Berek, J. ;
Bermudez, A. ;
Bhatla, N. ;
Cain, J. ;
Denny, L. ;
Fujiwara, K. ;
Hacker, N. ;
Avall-Lundqvist, E. ;
Mutch, D. ;
Odicino, F. ;
Pecorelli, S. ;
Prat, J. ;
Quinn, M. ;
Seoud, M. A-F. ;
Shrivastava, S. K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2014, 125 (02) :97-98
[5]  
Benedet JL, 2000, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V70, P209
[6]   Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri [J].
Bhatla, Neerja ;
Berek, Jonathan S. ;
Cuello Fredes, Mauricio ;
Denny, Lynette A. ;
Grenman, Seija ;
Karunaratne, Kanishka ;
Kehoe, Sean T. ;
Konishi, Ikuo ;
Olawaiye, Alexander B. ;
Prat, Jaime ;
Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2019, 145 (01) :129-135
[7]   Incidence and univariate models for lymphatic drainage disorders following management for cervical cancer [J].
Cea Garcia, Jorge ;
Rodriguez Jimenez, Inmaculada ;
Rios-Pena, Laura ;
Marquez Mareaver, Francisco ;
Rubio Rodriguez, Maria del Carmen .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2021, 47 (01) :343-351
[8]  
Chen W Q, 2018, Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi, V40, P5, DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2018.01.002
[9]   Locally advanced cervical cancer: A study of 5-year outcomes [J].
Chopra, Supriya ;
Gupta, Meetakshi ;
Mathew, Ashwathy ;
Mahantshetty, Umesh ;
Engineer, Reena ;
Lavanya, G. ;
Gupta, Sudeep ;
Ghosh, Jaya ;
Thakur, Meenakshi ;
Deodhar, Kedar ;
Menon, Santosh ;
Rekhi, Bharat ;
Bajpai, Jyoti ;
Gulia, Seema ;
Maheshwari, Amita ;
Kerkar, Rajendra ;
Shylasree, T. S. ;
Shrivastava, S. K. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 55 (01) :45-49
[10]   Completion of radical hysterectomy does not improve survival of patients with cervical cancer and intraoperatively detected lymph node involvement: ABRAX international retrospective cohort study [J].
Cibula, D. ;
Dostalek, L. ;
Hillemanns, P. ;
Scambia, G. ;
Jarkovsky, J. ;
Persson, J. ;
Raspagliesi, F. ;
Novak, Z. ;
Jaeger, A. ;
Capilna, M. E. ;
Weinberger, V. ;
Klat, J. ;
Schmidt, R. L. ;
Lopez, A. ;
Scibilia, G. ;
Pareja, R. ;
Kucukmetin, A. ;
Kreitner, L. ;
El-Balat, A. ;
Pereira, G. J. R. ;
Laufhutte, S. ;
Isla-Ortiz, D. ;
Toptas, T. ;
Gil-Ibanez, B. ;
Vergote, I. ;
Runnenbaum, I. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 143 :88-100