Prolonged diversion after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: Is it safe to wait?

被引:3
作者
Clancy, Cillian [1 ]
Connelly, Tara M. [1 ]
Jia, Xue [1 ]
Lipman, Jeremy [1 ]
Lightner, Amy L. [1 ]
Hull, Tracy [1 ]
Steele, Scott R. [1 ]
Holubar, Stefan D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Digest Dis & Surg Inst, Dept Colon & Rectal Surg, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
closure; ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; ileostomy; reversal; timing; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY; FECAL INCONTINENCE; ILEOSTOMY CLOSURE; COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTORS; OUTCOMES; CANCER;
D O I
10.1111/codi.16560
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: Diverting loop ileostomy reversal (DLI- R) is routinely performed from 2- 6 months following ileal pouch -anal anastomosis (IPAA). The safety of delayed reversal after IPAA is not well-defined. The aim of this study was to determine if prolonged diversion is associated with adverse outcomes compared to routine closure.Methods: Adult patients undergoing primary IPAA with DLI from 2000 to 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort study from our institutional database. Patients were stratified into tertiles based on timing of reversal: Routine (56- 116 days), Delayed (117- 180 days), or Prolonged (>6 months). Univariate analysis compared categorical variables between groups. Patients reversed at <8 weeks were excluded. Results: In total, 2615 patients underwent DLI- R following IPAA (3 -stage 61%, 2 -stage 39%; mean age 39.9 years). DLI- R was performed as Routine, Delayed and Prolonged in 1908 (72.9%), 426 (16.4%) and 281 (10.8%), respectively. Overall, DLI- R related compli- cations occurred in 12.4% (n = 324). The complication rate in the Routine group was 11% (n = 210), in the Delayed group was 12.2% (n = 52) and in the Prolonged group was 22.1% (n = 62). Reasons for prolonged diversion in the Prolonged group were complications at the time of IPAA in 207 (73.9%) or patient preference/scheduling in 73 (26.1%). DLI- R >6 months after IPAA due to complications had higher rates of overall complications following ileostomy reversal (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.85- 3.72, p < 0.001) whereas when DLI- R was delayed due to preference/scheduling outcomes were not different than the Routine group (p = 0.28).Conclusion: Prolonged time to ileostomy reversal after IPAA is probably safe without increased risk of complications when due to patient preference.
引用
收藏
页码:1187 / 1193
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Pouchitis and Pouch-Related Complications in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis [J].
Barnes, Edward L. ;
Herfarth, Hans H. ;
Kappelman, Michael D. ;
Zhang, Xian ;
Lightner, Amy ;
Long, Millie D. ;
Sandler, Robert S. .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 19 (08) :1583-+
[2]   Laparoscopic IPAA Is Not Associated With Decreased Rates of Incisional Hernia and Small-Bowel Obstruction When Compared With Open Technique: Long-term Follow-up of a Case-Matched Study [J].
Benlice, Cigdem ;
Stocchi, Luca ;
Costedio, Meagan ;
Gorgun, Emre ;
Hull, Tracy ;
Kessler, Hermann ;
Remzi, Feza H. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2015, 58 (03) :314-320
[3]   Protective loop-ileostomy in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis - advantages and disadvantages. A retrospective study [J].
Ellebaek, M. B. ;
Dilling Kjaer, M. ;
Spanggaard, K. ;
El-Faramawi, M. ;
Moller, S. ;
Qvist, N. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 23 (01) :145-152
[4]   Functional outcomes after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis [J].
Farouk, R ;
Pemberton, JH ;
Wolff, BG ;
Dozois, RR ;
Browning, S ;
Larson, D .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 231 (06) :919-924
[5]   Robotic versus laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA): a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Flynn, Julie ;
Larach, Jose T. ;
Kong, Joseph C. H. ;
Warrier, Satish K. ;
Heriot, Alexander .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 36 (07) :1345-1356
[6]   Incidence and predictors of postoperative ileus after loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Garfinkle, Richard ;
Savage, Paul ;
Boutros, Marylise ;
Landry, Tara ;
Reynier, Pauline ;
Morin, Nancy ;
Vasilevsky, Carol-Ann ;
Filion, Kristian B. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (08) :2430-2443
[7]   Restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis complicated by colorectal cancer [J].
Gorfine, SR ;
Harris, MT ;
Bub, DS ;
Bauer, JJ .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2004, 47 (08) :1377-1385
[8]  
Gorgun Emre, 2004, Clin Colon Rectal Surg, V17, P43, DOI 10.1055/s-2004-823070
[9]   Quality of Life and Timing of Stoma Closure in Patients With Rectal Cancer Undergoing Low Anterior Resection With Diverting Stoma: A Multicenter Longitudinal Observational Study [J].
Herrle, Florian ;
Sandra-Petrescu, Flavius ;
Weiss, Christel ;
Post, Stefan ;
Runkel, Norbert ;
Kienle, Peter .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2016, 59 (04) :281-290
[10]   Functional outcome following rectal surgery-predisposing factors for low anterior resection syndrome [J].
Hughes, Daniel Ll ;
Cornish, Julie ;
Morris, Chris .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 32 (05) :691-697