Factors Leading to Successful Performance on US National Licensure Exams for Medical Students: A Scoping Review

被引:14
作者
Jeyaraju, Maniraj [1 ,2 ]
Linford, Henry [3 ,4 ]
Mendes, Thiago Bosco [5 ,6 ]
Caufield-Noll, Christine [7 ]
Tackett, Sean [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Crozer Hlth, Upland, PA USA
[4] Texas Inst Grad Med Educ & Res, San Antonio, TX USA
[5] Univ Estado Sao Paulo Unesp, Dept Med Interna, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
[6] Univ Pittsburgh Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[7] Natl Inst Hlth Lib, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Bayview Med Ctr, Div Gen Internal Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[9] Johns Hopkins Bayview Med Ctr, 5200 Eastern Ave,MFL Ctr Tower Suite 2300, Baltimore, MD 21224 USA
关键词
USMLE STEP 1; SCIENCE SELF-ASSESSMENT; 2 CLINICAL KNOWLEDGE; ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT; PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY; MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS; CURRICULUM TYPE; SCHOOL; COMLEX; SCORES;
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0000000000004877
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
PurposeTo synthesize the evidence of the factors leading to successful performance on knowledge-based national licensure exams (NLEs) for medical students. MethodThe authors conducted a scoping review to summarize the peer-reviewed empiric literature that used United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 or Step 2 Clinical Knowledge or Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX) Level 1 or Level 2 Cognitive Evaluation scores as outcomes. The authors searched PubMed and Scopus without date restrictions through April 30, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened and selected studies for inclusion. Data were summarized narratively and with descriptive statistics. ResultsThe authors screened 1,185 unique citations and included 233 full-text studies in their review. Of these, 201 (86%) were studies of USMLE exams, 31 (13%) were studies of COMLEX exams, and 1 (0.4%) reported on both. The authors classified 29 studies (12%) as informing NLE preparation, 163 (70%) as attempting to identify predictive variables, and 76 (33%) as using NLE scores for program evaluation. Preparation studies found that the number of practice test items, practice exam scores, and less time in dedicated preparation correlated with higher NLE scores. Use of other commercial resources or study strategies was not consistently associated with higher scores. Predictive studies found the strongest relationships between individuals' performance on past assessments and their NLE scores. ConclusionsThe factors leading to successful performance on knowledge-based NLEs align with well-known principles from the cognitive sciences. Learners build on existing foundations of knowledge (reflected in their prior academic performance) and are likely to learn more efficiently with testing and spaced learning over time. While commercial test preparation resources are ubiquitous, there is no evidence that a single resource gives students a competitive advantage on NLEs. Developing habits of regular and continuous learning is necessary for clinical practice and successful NLE performance.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 148
页数:13
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   The Impact of a Peer-Designed and -Led USMLE Step 1 Review Course: Improvement in Preparation and Scores [J].
Alcamo, Alicia M. ;
Davids, Abby R. ;
Way, David P. ;
Lynn, D. Joanne ;
Vandre, Dale D. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2010, 85 :S45-S48
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, GLOBAL STRATEGY HUMA
[3]   The medical licensing examination debate [J].
Archer, Julian ;
Lynn, Nick ;
Roberts, Martin ;
Gale, Tom ;
de Bere, Sam Regan ;
Coombes, Lee .
REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2017, 11 (03) :315-322
[4]  
Baker H H, 2000, J Am Osteopath Assoc, V100, P238
[5]   Can students in a modified PBL curriculum exceed the national mean on USMLE Part 1? [J].
Baldwin, W ;
Bankston, P ;
Anderson, WM ;
Echtenkamp, S ;
Haak, R ;
Smith, P ;
Iatridis, PG .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2002, 36 (08) :791-791
[6]   Class-Wide Access to a Commercial Step 1 Question Bank During Preclinical Organ-Based Modules: A Pilot Project [J].
Banos, James H. ;
Pepin, Mark E. ;
Van Wagoner, Nicholas .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2018, 93 (03) :486-490
[7]   A Novel USMLE Step 1 Projection Model Using a Single Comprehensive Basic Science Self-Assessment Taken During a Brief Intense Study Period [J].
Bigach, Stephen D. ;
Winkelman, Robert D. ;
Savakus, Jonathan C. ;
Papp, Klara K. .
MEDICAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR, 2021, 31 (01) :67-73
[8]   Validity of the Medical College Admission Test for predicting MD-PhD student outcomes [J].
Bills, James L. ;
VanHouten, Jacob ;
Grundy, Michelle M. ;
Chalkley, Roger ;
Dermody, Terence S. .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2016, 21 (01) :33-49
[9]  
Bonasso Patrick, 2015, MedEdPublish, V4, DOI 10.15694/mep.2015.004.0005
[10]   Impact of the foundations of clinical medicine course on USMLE scores [J].
Brownfield, Elisha L. ;
Blue, Amy V. ;
Powell, Caroline K. ;
Geesey, Mark E. ;
Moran, William P. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 23 (07) :1002-1005