Clinicopathologic Evaluation of CTNNB1 Mutations in High-Intermediate Risk Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma

被引:3
|
作者
Haag, Jennifer G. [1 ,6 ]
Wolsky, Rebecca J. [2 ]
Moroney, Marisa R. [3 ]
Sheren, Jamie [5 ]
Sheeder, Jeanelle [1 ]
Bitler, Benjamin G. [4 ]
Corr, Bradley R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Pathol, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Reprod Sci, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Colorado Mol Correlates Lab, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Anschutz Med Campus,12631 E 17th Ave,B198-6, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
关键词
Endometrial endometrioid carcinoma; High-intermediate risk; CTNNB1; mutation; beta-catenin; TCGA; RADIATION-THERAPY; CANCER; L1CAM; RADIOTHERAPY; CATENIN; SURGERY; GRADE;
D O I
10.1097/PGP.0000000000000865
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
CTNNB1 mutations convey increased risk of recurrence in low-risk endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC). Results from previous high-intermediate risk (HIR) cohorts are mixed. The aims of this study were to correlate CTNNB1 mutational status with clinical outcomes and to evaluate the relationship between CTNNB1 mutations and the 4 prognostic subgroups defined by The Cancer Genome Atlas in HIR EEC. CTNNB1 mutational status was determined by Sanger sequencing of exon 3 of the CTNNB1 gene. Mismatch repair, POLE, p53, and L1 cell-adhesion molecule (L1CAM) status were also evaluated. Descriptive statistics and survival analyses were performed. Eighty-eight cases of HIR EEC were identified, of which 22 (25%) were CTNNB1 mutant (CTNNB1-mut) and 66 (75%) were wild-type (CTNNB1-WT). Median follow-up was 60 mo. Recurrence occurred in 13/88 (15%) patients. Recurrence rates were not significantly different between patients with CTNNB1-mut and CTNNB1-WT tumors (14% vs. 15%, P=0.86). Recurrence-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different (recurrence-free survival hazard ratio: 0.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.27-3.52, P=0.96; overall survival hazard ratio: 0.23, 95% confidence interval: 0.03-1.71, P=0.15). Mismatch repair deficiency was more prevalent in CTNNB1-WT compared with CTNNB1-mut tumors (46% vs. 14%, P=0.01); prevalence of POLE mutations and aberrant p53 were not significantly different. In contrast to patients with low-risk EEC, no differences in recurrence or survival were found in patients with HIR EEC with CTNNB1-mut compared with CTNNB1-WT tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 53
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] XImportance of CTNNB1 Mutation in Intermediate Risk, Stage I Endometrial Cancer Patients Considered for Adjuvant Radiation Therapy
    Kurnit, Katherine
    Fellman, Bryan
    Broaddus, Russell
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2019, 99
  • [42] Molecular profiling of primary endometrioid endometrial cancer and matched lung metastases: CTNNB1 mutation as a potential driver
    Gordhandas, Sushmita
    Paula, Arnaud Da Cruz
    Kertowidjojo, Elizabeth C.
    Pareja, Fresia
    Dessources, Kimberly
    Silva, Edaise M. da
    Derakhshan, Fatemeh
    Mueller, Jennifer J.
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    Chui, M. Herman
    Weigelt, Britta
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 53
  • [43] CTNNB1 predicts better progression-free survival in endometrioid endometrial cancer patients treated with chemotherapy
    Penick, E. R.
    Tian, C.
    Bateman, N. W.
    Oliver, J.
    Mitchell, D.
    Conrads, T. P.
    Hamilton, C. A.
    Maxwell, G. L.
    Darcy, K. M.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 145 : 81 - 81
  • [44] Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I high-intermediate risk endometrial carcinoma with lymph-vascular invasion
    Nasioudis, Dimitrios
    Oh, Jinhee
    Ko, Emily M.
    Haggerty, Ashley F.
    Cory, Lori
    Giuntoli, Robert L., II
    Kim, Sarah H.
    Morgan, Mark A.
    Latif, Nawar A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2022, 32 (09) : 1129 - 1134
  • [45] Are All High-Intermediate Risk Early Stage Endometrioid Carcinomas of the Uterus Created Equal?
    Leeman, J. E.
    Zumsteg, Z. S.
    Kollmeier, M. A.
    Gardner, G.
    Abu-Rustum, N.
    Alektiar, K. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E650 - E650
  • [46] Clinicopathologic Characterization of Risk Associated with FIGO Grade 2 Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma
    Kihshen, Hermon
    Tannenbaum, Alex
    Reetz, Eric
    Xu, Jin
    Weisman, Paul
    McGregor, Stephanie
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2024, 104 (03) : S1184 - S1185
  • [47] Cost-Effectiveness of Adjuvant Intravaginal Brachytherapy in High-Intermediate Risk Early Stage Endometrial Carcinoma
    Stahl, J. M.
    Lester-Coll, N. H.
    Bledsoe, T. J.
    An, Y.
    Damast, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02): : E416 - E416
  • [48] ARID1A and CTNNB1/β-Catenin Molecular Status Affects the Clinicopathologic Features and Prognosis of Endometrial Carcinoma: Implications for an Improved Surrogate Molecular Classification
    De Leo, Antonio
    de Biase, Dario
    Lenzi, Jacopo
    Barbero, Giovanna
    Turchetti, Daniela
    Grillini, Marco
    Ravegnini, Gloria
    Angelini, Sabrina
    Zamagni, Claudio
    Coluccelli, Sara
    Dondi, Giulia
    De Iaco, Pierandrea
    Perrone, Anna Myriam
    Tallini, Giovanni
    Santini, Donatella
    Ceccarelli, Claudio
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (05) : 1 - 22
  • [49] Clinical relevance of high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer according to European risk classification
    Rychlik, Agnieszka
    Zapardiel, Ignacio
    Baquedano, Laura
    Maestre, Maria Angeles Martinez
    Querleu, Denis
    Martin, Pluvio J. Coronado
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 (10) : 1528 - 1534
  • [50] Identifying a molecular profile to predict the risk of recurrence in high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer
    Arend, Rebecca C.
    Scalise, Carly B.
    Dholakia, Jhalak
    Kamal, Maahum Z.
    Thigpen, Haley B.
    Crossman, David
    Huh, Warner K.
    Leath, Charles A., III
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (22): : 8238 - 8250