Clinicopathologic Evaluation of CTNNB1 Mutations in High-Intermediate Risk Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma

被引:3
|
作者
Haag, Jennifer G. [1 ,6 ]
Wolsky, Rebecca J. [2 ]
Moroney, Marisa R. [3 ]
Sheren, Jamie [5 ]
Sheeder, Jeanelle [1 ]
Bitler, Benjamin G. [4 ]
Corr, Bradley R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Pathol, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Reprod Sci, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Colorado Mol Correlates Lab, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Anschutz Med Campus,12631 E 17th Ave,B198-6, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
关键词
Endometrial endometrioid carcinoma; High-intermediate risk; CTNNB1; mutation; beta-catenin; TCGA; RADIATION-THERAPY; CANCER; L1CAM; RADIOTHERAPY; CATENIN; SURGERY; GRADE;
D O I
10.1097/PGP.0000000000000865
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
CTNNB1 mutations convey increased risk of recurrence in low-risk endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC). Results from previous high-intermediate risk (HIR) cohorts are mixed. The aims of this study were to correlate CTNNB1 mutational status with clinical outcomes and to evaluate the relationship between CTNNB1 mutations and the 4 prognostic subgroups defined by The Cancer Genome Atlas in HIR EEC. CTNNB1 mutational status was determined by Sanger sequencing of exon 3 of the CTNNB1 gene. Mismatch repair, POLE, p53, and L1 cell-adhesion molecule (L1CAM) status were also evaluated. Descriptive statistics and survival analyses were performed. Eighty-eight cases of HIR EEC were identified, of which 22 (25%) were CTNNB1 mutant (CTNNB1-mut) and 66 (75%) were wild-type (CTNNB1-WT). Median follow-up was 60 mo. Recurrence occurred in 13/88 (15%) patients. Recurrence rates were not significantly different between patients with CTNNB1-mut and CTNNB1-WT tumors (14% vs. 15%, P=0.86). Recurrence-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different (recurrence-free survival hazard ratio: 0.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.27-3.52, P=0.96; overall survival hazard ratio: 0.23, 95% confidence interval: 0.03-1.71, P=0.15). Mismatch repair deficiency was more prevalent in CTNNB1-WT compared with CTNNB1-mut tumors (46% vs. 14%, P=0.01); prevalence of POLE mutations and aberrant p53 were not significantly different. In contrast to patients with low-risk EEC, no differences in recurrence or survival were found in patients with HIR EEC with CTNNB1-mut compared with CTNNB1-WT tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 53
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PIK3CA mutations in endometrial carcinoma:: Correlation with KRAS and CTNNB1 (β-catenin) mutations
    Cruz, F
    Heinrich, MC
    Le, C
    Bainbridge, T
    Corless, CL
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2006, 86 : 175A - 175A
  • [22] CTNNB1 and APC mutations in odontogenic carcinoma with dentinoid
    Gondak, Rogerio Oliveira
    Mariano, Fernanda Viviane
    de Sousa, Silvia Ferreira
    de Siqueira, Elisa Carvalho
    Diaz, Katya Pulido
    Liporoni Martins, Leandro Aurelio
    Altemani, Albina
    Mosqueda-Taylor, Adalberto
    Gomez, Ricardo Santiago
    Gomes, Carolina Cavalieri
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 129 (05): : E249 - E256
  • [23] Morules But Not Squamous Differentiation are a Reliable Indicator of CTNNB1 (β-catenin) Mutations in Endometrial Carcinoma and Precancers
    Niu, Shuang
    Lucas, Elena
    Molberg, Kyle
    Strickland, Amanda
    Wang, Yan
    Carrick, Kelley
    Rivera-Colon, Glorimar
    Gwin, Katja
    SoRelle, Jeffrey A.
    Castrillon, Diego H.
    Zheng, Wenxin
    Chen, Hao
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2022, 46 (10) : 1447 - 1455
  • [24] Ovarian and endometrial endometrioid carcinomas have distinct CTNNB1 and PTEN mutation profiles
    McConechy, Melissa K.
    Ding, Jiarui
    Senz, Janine
    Yang, Winnie
    Melnyk, Nataliya
    Tone, Alicia A.
    Prentice, Leah M.
    Wiegand, Kimberly C.
    McAlpine, Jessica N.
    Shah, Sohrab P.
    Lee, Cheng-Han
    Goodfellow, Paul J.
    Gilks, C. Blake
    Huntsman, David G.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2014, 27 (01) : 128 - 134
  • [25] Estrogen/Progesterone Receptor Loss, CTNNB1 and KRAS Mutations Are Associated With Local Recurrence or Distant Metastasis in Low-Grade Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma
    Chibbar, Rajni
    Foerstner, Sabrina
    Suresh, Janarathnee
    Chibbar, Richa
    Piche, Alexandre
    Kundapur, Deeksha
    Kanthan, Rani
    Kundapur, Vijayanand
    Lee, Cheng Han
    Agrawal, Anita
    Lai, Raymond
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2023, 31 (03) : 181 - 188
  • [26] β-catenin (CTNNB1) and BRAF mutations in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
    Lu, Li-Chun
    Shao, Yu-Yun
    Hsieh, Min-Shu
    Huang, Chien-Chung
    Cheng, Ann-Lii
    Hsu, Chih-Hung
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 72
  • [27] The impact of adjuvant treatment in intermediate risk, stage I endometrial cancer with somatic CTNNB1 mutation
    Kurnit, K. C.
    Fellman, B.
    Xie, S. S.
    Bowser, J.
    Mills, G. B.
    Broaddus, R.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 154 : 74 - 74
  • [28] CTNNB1 p.L31P mutation in an ovarian endometrioid carcinoma with synchronous uterine endometrioid carcinoma
    Pecorella, Irene
    Coppa, Anna
    Nicolussi, Arianna
    Manganaro, Lucia
    Fiorentin, Francesco
    Palaia, Innocenza
    Muzii, Ludovico
    PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2020, 216 (12)
  • [29] The role of CTNNB1 mutations and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in anti-angiogenesis treatment of endometrial carcinoma
    Berger, Amnon A.
    Kawaler, Emily A.
    Dao, Fanny
    Misirlioglu, Selim
    Fernandez, Ernesto Arostegui
    Olvera, Narciso
    Van Oudenhove, Elke
    DeLair, Deborah
    Levine, Douglas A.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 167 (02) : 323 - 333
  • [30] Frequent somatic TERT promoter mutations and CTNNB1 mutations in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Lee, Seung Eun
    Chang, Seong-Hwan
    Kim, Wook Youn
    Lim, So Dug
    Kim, Wan Seop
    Hwang, Tea Sook
    Han, Hye Seung
    ONCOTARGET, 2016, 7 (43) : 69267 - 69275