Effects of a Motion Graphic on Escalator Safety on College Students' Behavioural Intention, Determined Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology

被引:2
作者
Chiu, Jen-, I [1 ]
Tsuei, Mengping [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taipei Univ Educ, Grad Sch Curriculum & Instruct Commun Technol, 134,Sec 2,Ho Ping East Rd, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Escalator safety; Motion graphics; Safety education; UTAUT model; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; GENDER; ANIMATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1007/s10639-022-11195-1
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Escalator-related injuries are common among metro passengers in urban cities. In this study, a motion graphic promoting escalator safety principles was developed and used to investigate college students' behavioural intentions regarding escalator safety. The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model was adopted as the study framework. A behavioural intention questionnaire and a motion graphic based on the UTAUT model were developed in this study. The UTAUT model was examined using a stepwise regression approach. In total, 146 college students participated in this study. The students' performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions predicted their behavioural intentions regarding escalator safety. Gender moderated the effect of performance expectancy on behavioural intention, and motion graphics learning experience moderated the effects of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions on behavioural intention. This study attempted to empirically identify the main factors affecting passengers' attitudes toward escalator safety-related behaviour. The results have implications for the design of motion graphics for escalator safety education as part of the public service announcements of metro systems.
引用
收藏
页码:5453 / 5470
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Ajzen I., 1980, Understanding attitudes and predictiing social behavior, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2]
[2]  
Al-Sharif L, 2006, Escalator human factors: passenger behaviour, accidents and design
[3]  
Alamarat, 2020, J CRIT REV, V7, P321
[4]   SAFE BEHAVIOR AND SAFETY MOTIVATION [J].
ANDRIESSEN, JHTH .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENTS, 1978, 1 (04) :363-376
[5]  
Asia News Network, 2019, SAF CAMP LOOK CHANG
[6]  
Ayres Thomas J., 2019, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, V63, P1839, DOI 10.1177/1071181319631069
[7]   Does animation enhance learning? A meta-analysis [J].
Berney, Sandra ;
Betrancourt, Mireille .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2016, 101 :150-167
[8]   A NEW INCREMENTAL FIT INDEX FOR GENERAL STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS [J].
BOLLEN, KA .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1989, 17 (03) :303-316
[9]  
Bummara V., 2015, Advances in Journalism Communication, V03, P71, DOI [https://doi.org/10.4236/ajc.2015.34008, DOI 10.4236/AJC.2015.34008]
[10]   Factors Determining the Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Learning: An Application and Extension of the UTAUT Model [J].
Chao, Cheng-Min .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10