Quality of life after brain injury-overall scale, Japanese version: assessment of reliability and validity

被引:0
作者
Suzuki, Megumi [1 ]
Wu, Yi-Jhen [2 ]
Ota, Kikuo [3 ]
von Wild, Klaus R. H. [4 ]
Naito, Mariko [5 ]
Maeda, Akiko [6 ]
Hirano, Asuka [7 ]
Yamada, Masayuki [5 ]
Saitoh, Eiichi [3 ]
Kondo, Izumi [8 ]
Zeldovich, Marina [9 ]
von Steinbuechel, Nicole [2 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Fujita Hlth Univ, Grad Sch Hlth Sci, 1-98 Dengakugakubo,Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi 4701192, Japan
[2] Georg August Univ, Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Inst Med Psychol & Med Sociol, Gottingen, Germany
[3] Fujita Hlth Univ, Sch Med, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
[4] Fujita Hlth Univ, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
[5] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Biomed & Hlth Sci, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan
[6] Fujita Hlth Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
[7] Fujita Hlth Univ Hosp, Dept Rehabil, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
[8] Natl Ctr Geriatr & Gerontol, Dept Rehabil Med, Obu, Aichi, Japan
[9] Univ Innsbruck, Inst Psychol, Vienna, Austria
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Quality of life; traumatic brain injury; cognitive dysfunction; validity; Patient-Reported Outcome; HEALTH SURVEY; QOLIBRI; SF-36;
D O I
10.1080/02699052.2024.2309652
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This study analyzed the linguistic and psychometric validation of the Japanese version of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury-Overall Scale (QOLIBRI-OS) consisting of six items which cover several TBI-relevant domains. We hypothesized that the Japanese version has good reliability, convergent validity, and divergent validity, compared with its long version, the 37-item QOLIBRI. The QOLIBRI-OS Japanese version was forward and back-translated from the English version. In total, 129 individuals participated in this study after experiencing a traumatic brain injury and attending clinics, rehabilitation centers, and support centers in Japan. The structure of the QOLIBRI-OS was investigated by confirmatory factor analyses and compared with the QOLIBRI. Only one factor was extracted, and a model with one underlying factor had a good fit. The QOLIBRI-OS showed good-to-excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The QOLIBRI-OS was positively correlated with the QOLIBRI, Short Form Health Survey-36 version 2, and Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended, and negatively correlated with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The results suggest that the QOLIBRI-OS Japanese version is a reliable and valid tool for assessing disease-specific health-related QOL in individuals after traumatic brain injury in Japan.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 266
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Acquadro C., 2012, Linguistic Validation Manual for Health Outcome Assessments
  • [2] Literature review of methods to translate health-related quality of life questionnaires for use in multinational clinical trials
    Acquadro, Catherine
    Conway, Katrin
    Hareendran, Asha
    Aaronson, Neil
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (03) : 509 - 521
  • [3] Testing the Significance of a Correlation With Nonnormal Data: Comparison of Pearson, Spearman, Transformation, and Resampling Approaches
    Bishara, Anthony J.
    Hittner, James B.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2012, 17 (03) : 399 - 417
  • [4] Neuropsychological rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury: do carers benefit?
    Bowen, A
    Tennant, A
    Neumann, V
    Chamberlain, MA
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 2001, 15 (01) : 29 - 38
  • [5] ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF ASSESSING MODEL FIT
    BROWNE, MW
    CUDECK, R
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1992, 21 (02) : 230 - 258
  • [6] Bulmer M. G., 1979, Principles of statistics
  • [7] Trajectories and associated factors of quality of life, global outcome, and post-concussion symptoms in the first year following mild traumatic brain injury
    Chiang, Chia-Chen
    Guo, Su-Er
    Huang, Kuo-Chang
    Lee, Bih-O
    Fan, Jun-Yu
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (08) : 2009 - 2019
  • [8] A POWER PRIMER
    COHEN, J
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) : 155 - 159
  • [9] Dewan MC, 2019, J NEUROSURG, V130, P1065, DOI [10.3171/2017.10.JNS17439, 10.3171/2017.10.JNS17352]
  • [10] Fayers P. M., 2013, Quality of life: the assessment