Mixed mode of artificial liver support in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure: a retrospective cohort study

Background and aims Different modes of artificial liver support (ALS) therapy can improve the survival of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). This study aimed to compare the effects of mixed using different modes of ALS (MALS) and single using one mode of ALS (SALS) on 28- and 90-day survival rates of ACLF. Methods Clinical data and survival times of patients with ACLF treated for ALS between January 1, 2018 and December 30, 2021 were retrospectively collected. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors of 28- and 90-day mortalities. Results Of the 462 eligible ACLF patients, 388 belonged to the SALS group (76.3% male, 74.2% cirrhosis) and 74 to the MALS group (86.5% male, 71.6% cirrhosis). Comparison of 28-day and 90-day crude mortality between the SALS and MALS groups showed no significant differences (28-day: 20.4% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.27; 90-day: 44.6% vs. 52.7%, p = 0.20). After adjusting for confounders, the 28-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-0.65) and 90-day mortality (aHR: 0.65, 95% CI 0.44-0.95) in the MALS group were significantly lower than those in the SALS group. These associations were consistently observed across pre-specified subgroups according to age, sex, etiology, and Child-Pugh grade. However, positive interactions between MALS and 90-day mortality were found between MALS and 90-day mortality in those with MELD score >= 22 and international normalized ratio >= 1.9 (p for interaction < 0.05). Conclusion MALS therapy significantly decreased 28- and 90-day mortalities of ACLF than SALS did, especially in advanced stages.