Micro-Ultrasound: Current Role in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Future Possibilities

被引:13
作者
Dias, Adriano Basso [1 ]
Ghai, Sangeet [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Mt Sinai Hosp, Womens Coll Hosp,Joint Dept Med Imaging, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
关键词
prostate cancer; micro-ultrasound; review; cancer detection; comparison; mpMRI; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15041280
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in males, and ranks second for cancer death in men. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can detect PCa more accurately than biopsy alone and is now the recommended initial test in men at risk for PCa. MRI however requires additional resources and cost. Micro-ultrasound (microUS) is a new high resolution ultrasound technology that can be used to image the prostate. It integrates into the standard clinical workflow of prostate biopsy. In this review, 13 relevant publications comparing detection of clinically significant PCa between MRI and microUS were selected. The studies conclude that prostate cancer detection by microUS and MRI are comparable. Prostate Cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in men. Population screening using prostate specific antigen (PSA) blood test and digital rectal exam (DRE) is recommended by the NCCN, EAU and other prominent clinical guidelines. While MRI is the recommended initial test in men at risk for PCa, micro-Ultrasound (MicroUS) is a novel high resolution ultrasound technology that has shown promise in PCa detection. This article provides a narrative review of the studies to date which have been conducted to evaluate the functionality and efficacy of MicroUS within the patient care pathway for prostate cancer. A total of 13 relevant publications comparing detection of csPCa between MicroUS and mpMRI were selected. An amount of 4 publications referring to use of MicroUS for other indications were found. Each publication was evaluated for risk of bias and applicability using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS-2) tool. The studies reviewed conclude that MicroUS detection rates for clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis are comparable to the detection rates of mpMRI guided biopsy procedures. While the existing literature indicates that MicroUS should replace conventional TRUS for prostate imaging and biopsy, it is not yet clear whether MicroUS should be used on its own or in conjunction with mpMRI for augmenting prostate cancer detection. The ongoing OPTIMUM trial will provide evidence on how best to utilize this new technology. Early data also suggest this flexible new imaging modality has a place in local staging and active surveillance of prostate cancer as well as in bladder cancer staging.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
    Ahdoot, Michael
    Wilbur, Andrew R.
    Reese, Sarah E.
    Lebastchi, Amir H.
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Gomella, Patrick T.
    Bloom, Jonathan
    Gurram, Sandeep
    Siddiqui, Minhaj
    Pinsky, Paul
    Parnes, Howard
    Linehan, W. Marston
    Merino, Maria
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (10) : 917 - 928
  • [2] Micro-ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance
    Albers, Patrick
    Wang, Betty
    Broomfield, Stacey
    Martin, Anais Medina
    Fung, Christopher
    Kinnaird, Adam
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 46 : 33 - 35
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2022, Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • [4] The use of 29 MHz transrectal micro-ultrasound to stratify the prostate cancer risk in patients with PI-RADS III lesions at multiparametric MRI: A single institutional analysis
    Avolio, Pier Paolo
    Lughezzani, Giovanni
    Paciotti, Marco
    Maffei, Davide
    Uleri, Alessandro
    Frego, Nicola
    Hurle, Rodolfo
    Lazzeri, Massimo
    Saita, Alberto
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Casale, Paolo
    Buffi, Maria
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 39 (12) : 832.e1 - 832.e7
  • [5] Comparison of Initial Experience with Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Guided Micro-Ultrasound Biopsies versus Established Transperineal Robotic Ultrasound Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsies for Prostate Cancer
    Claros, Oliver Rojas
    Tourinho-Barbosa, Rafael Rocha
    Fregeville, Aude
    Colomer Gallardo, Anna
    Muttin, Fabio
    Carneiro, Arie
    Stabile, Armando
    Moschini, Marco
    Macek, Petr
    Cathala, Nathalie
    Mombet, Annick
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (05) : 918 - 923
  • [6] MRI-directed high-frequency (29MhZ) TRUS-guided biopsies: initial results of a single-center study
    Cornud, Francois
    Lefevre, Arnaud
    Flam, Thierry
    Dumonceau, Olivier
    Galiano, Marc
    Soyer, Philippe
    Camparo, Philippe
    Barral, Matthias
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (09) : 4838 - 4846
  • [7] Micro-ultrasound-guided biopsies versus systematic biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dariane, Charles
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Barret, Eric
    Beauval, Jean-Baptiste
    Brureau, Laurent
    Crehange, Gilles
    Fromont, Gaelle
    Gauthe, Mathieu
    Mathieu, Romain
    Renard-Penna, Raphaele
    Roubaud, Guilhem
    Ruffion, Alain
    Sargos, Paul
    Roupret, Morgan
    Fiard, Gaelle
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 41 (03) : 641 - 651
  • [8] Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis
    de Rooij, Maarten
    Hamoen, Esther H. J.
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Rovers, Maroeska M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 70 (02) : 233 - 245
  • [9] Multiparametric ultrasound and micro-ultrasound in prostate cancer: a comprehensive review
    Dias, Adriano Basso
    O'Brien, Ciara
    Correas, Jean-Michel
    Ghai, Sangeet
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 95 (1131)
  • [10] EAU Guidelines, 2022, EAU ANN C AMSTERDAM