共 29 条
Estimation of a Machine Learning-Based Decision Rule to Reduce Hypoglycemia Among Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Post Hoc Analysis of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the WISDM Study
被引:0
|作者:
Kahkoska, Anna R.
[1
,2
]
Shah, Kushal S.
[3
]
Kosorok, Michael R.
[3
]
Miller, Kellee M.
[4
]
Rickels, Michael
[5
]
Weinstock, Ruth S.
[6
]
Young, Laura A.
[7
]
Pratley, Richard E.
[8
]
机构:
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Nutr, 2205A McGavran Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, UNC Ctr Aging & Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] Jaeb Ctr Hlth Res, Tampa, FL USA
[5] Univ Penn, Rodebaugh Diabet Ctr, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, Div Endocrinol Diabet & Metab, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
[7] Univ N Carolina, Div Endocrinol & Metab, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[8] AdventHlth Translat Res Inst, Orlando, FL USA
来源:
JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
|
2024年
/
18卷
/
05期
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
type;
1;
diabetes;
older adults;
continuous glucose monitoring;
hypoglycemia;
heterogeneous treatment effects;
precision medicine;
CONSENSUS;
MEDICINE;
METRICS;
D O I:
10.1177/19322968221149040
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Background: The Wireless Innovation for Seniors with Diabetes Mellitus (WISDM) study demonstrated continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) reduced hypoglycemia over 6 months among older adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) compared with blood glucose monitoring (BGM). We explored heterogeneous treatment effects of CGM on hypoglycemia by formulating a data-driven decision rule that selects an intervention (ie, CGM vs BGM) to minimize percentage of time Method: The precision medicine analyses used data from participants with complete data (n = 194 older adults, including those who received CGM [n = 100] and BGM [n = 94] in the trial). Policy tree and decision list algorithms were fit with 14 baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory measures. The primary outcome was CGM-measured percentage of time spent in hypoglycemic range (<70 mg/dL), and the decision rule assigned participants to a subgroup reflecting the treatment estimated to minimize this outcome across all follow-up visits. Results: The optimal decision rule was found to be a decision list with 3 steps. The first step moved WISDM participants with baseline time-below range >1.35% and no detectable C-peptide levels to the CGM subgroup (n = 139), and the second step moved WISDM participants with a baseline time-below range of >6.45% to the CGM subgroup (n = 18). The remaining participants (n = 37) were left in the BGM subgroup. Compared with the BGM subgroup (n = 37; 19%), the group for whom CGM minimized hypoglycemia (n = 157; 81%) had more baseline hypoglycemia, a lower proportion of detectable C-peptide, higher glycemic variability, longer disease duration, and higher proportion of insulin pump use. Conclusions: The decision rule underscores the benefits of CGM for older adults to reduce hypoglycemia. Diagnostic CGM and laboratory markers may inform decision-making surrounding therapeutic CGM and identify older adults for whom CGM may be a critical intervention to reduce hypoglycemia.
引用
收藏
页码:1079 / 1086
页数:8
相关论文