Promoting Lung Cancer Screen Decision-Making and Early Detection Behaviors A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:1
作者
Lin, Xiujing [1 ]
Lei, Fang [2 ]
Lin, Jialing [1 ]
Li, Yonglin
Chen, Qiuhong [1 ]
Arbing, Rachel [3 ]
Chen, Wei-Ti [3 ]
Huang, Feifei [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Sch Nursing, 1 Xueyu Rd, Fuzhou 350108, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Minnesota, Sch Nursing, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Nursing, Los Angeles, CA USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cancer screening; Decision aids; Lung neoplasms; Precaution adoption process model; Shared decision making; HIGH-RISK INDIVIDUALS; AWARENESS; IMPACT; AID; QUALITY; MODEL; INTERVENTIONS; FEASIBILITY; KNOWLEDGE; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1097/NCC.0000000000001334
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Promoting lung cancer screening (LCS) is complex. Previous studies have overlooked that LCS behaviors are stage based and thus did not identify the characteristics of LCS interventions at different screening stages. Objective: The aims of this study were to explore the characteristics and efficacy of interventions in promoting LCS decision making and behaviors and to evaluate these interventions. Methods: We conducted a study search from the inception of each bibliographic database to April 8, 2023. The precaution adoption process model was used to synthesize and classify the evidence. The RE-AIM framework was used to evaluate the effectiveness of LCS programs. Heterogeneity tests and meta-analysis were performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Results: We included 31 studies that covered 4 LCS topics: knowledge of lung cancer, knowledge of LCS, value clarification exercises, and LCS supportive resources. Patient decision aids outperformed educational materials in improving knowledge and decision outcomes with a significant reduction in decision conflict (standardized mean difference, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, -1.15 to -0.47; P < .001). Completion rates of LCS ranged from 3.6% to 98.8%. Interventions that included screening resources outperformed interventions that used patient decision aids alone in improving LCS completion. The proportions of reported RE-AIM indicators were highest for reach (69.59%), followed by adoption (43.87%), effectiveness (36.13%), implementation (33.33%), and maintenance (9.68%). Conclusion: Evidence from 31 studies identified intervention characteristics and effectiveness of LCS interventions based on different stages of decision making. Implications for Practice: It is crucial to develop targeted and systematic interventions based on the characteristics of each stage of LCS to maximize intervention effectiveness and reduce the burden of lung cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
    Aberle, Denise R.
    Adams, Amanda M.
    Berg, Christine D.
    Black, William C.
    Clapp, Jonathan D.
    Fagerstrom, Richard M.
    Gareen, Ilana F.
    Gatsonis, Constantine
    Marcus, Pamela M.
    Sicks, JoRean D.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (05) : 395 - 409
  • [2] The gap between knowledge and undergoing colorectal cancer screening using the Health Belief Model: A national survey
    Almadi, Majid A.
    Alghamdi, Faisal
    [J]. SAUDI JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 25 (01) : 27 - 39
  • [3] Alsulamy N., 2020, Patient Educ Couns, pS0738
  • [4] Baseline Results of the West London lung cancer screening pilot study - Impact of mobile scanners and dual risk model utilisation
    Bartlett, Emily C.
    Kemp, Samuel, V
    Ridge, Carole A.
    Desai, Sujal R.
    Mirsadraee, Saeed
    Morjaria, Jaymin B.
    Shah, Pallav L.
    Popat, Sanjay
    Nicholson, Andrew G.
    Rice, Alexandra J.
    Jordan, Simon
    Begum, Sofina
    Mani, Aleksander
    Derbyshire, Jane
    Morris, Katie
    Chen, Michelle
    Peacock, Christine
    Addis, James
    Martins, Maria
    Kaye, Stan B.
    Padley, Simon P. G.
    Devaraj, Anand
    McDonald, Fiona
    Robertus, Jan Lucas
    Lim, Eric
    Barnett, Joseph
    Finch, Jonathan
    Dalal, Paras
    Yousaf, Nadia
    Jamali, Armita
    Ivashniova, Natallia
    Phillips, Claudette
    Newsom-Davies, Thomas
    Lee, Richard
    Vaghani, Pritti
    Whiteside, Sarah
    Vaughan-Smith, Stephen
    [J]. LUNG CANCER, 2020, 148 : 12 - 19
  • [5] The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of patient navigation programs across the cancer continuum: A systematic review
    Bernardo, Brittany M.
    Zhang, Xiaochen
    Hery, Chloe M. Beverly
    Meadows, Rachel J.
    Paskett, Electra D.
    [J]. CANCER, 2019, 125 (16) : 2747 - 2761
  • [6] Bonney A, 2022, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD013829.pub2, 10.1002/14651858.CD013829]
  • [7] Terminate lung cancer (TLC) study-A mixed-methods population approach to increase lung cancer screening awareness and low-dose computed tomography in Eastern Kentucky
    Cardarelli, Roberto
    Reese, David
    Roper, Karen L.
    Cardarelli, Kathryn
    Feltner, Frances J.
    Studts, Jamie L.
    Knight, Jennifer R.
    Armstrong, Debra
    Weaver, Anthony
    Shafferi, Dana
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 46 : 1 - 8
  • [8] Computer-Tailored Decision Support Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Community-Based Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Carter-Harris, Lisa
    Comer, Robert Skipworth
    Slaven, James E., II
    Monahan, Patrick O.
    Vode, Emilee
    Hanna, Nasser H.
    Ceppa, DuyKhanh Pham
    Rawl, Susan M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (11)
  • [9] Lung Cancer Screening Participation: Developing a Conceptual Model to Guide Research
    Carter-Harris, Lisa
    Davis, Lorie L.
    Rawl, Susan M.
    [J]. RESEARCH AND THEORY FOR NURSING PRACTICE, 2016, 30 (04) : 333 - 352
  • [10] Shared decision-making and the lessons learned about decision regret in cancer patients
    Chichua, Mariam
    Brivio, Eleonora
    Mazzoni, Davide
    Pravettoni, Gabriella
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (06) : 4587 - 4590