The defect depth evaluation based on the dual-sensor strategy: Resisting the lift-off disturbance in magnetic flux leakage testing

被引:7
作者
Shi, Peng-Peng [1 ]
Hao, Shuai [1 ]
Liang, Tian-Shou [1 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Xian 710055, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Magnetic flux leakage; Defect evaluation; Lift-off disturbance; Dual-sensor strategy; Magnetic dipole theory; SIMULATION; FIELD; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.171039
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The quantitative evaluation of defect information is the key issue in magnetic flux leakage (MFL) nondestructive testing on ferromagnetic materials. For the multi-sensor strategy with the same lift-off values, the arrayed layout of probes improves the testing efficiency, but the evaluation precision is still susceptible to the lift-off disturbance. This paper recommends a dual-sensor strategy with a given lift-off difference to resist the lift-off disturbance. Here, the reason for the possible overestimating and underestimating evaluation is clarified for the traditional single-sensor strategy using the magnetic dipole theory in MFL testing. In this paper, the effectiveness of the proposed dual-sensor strategy is demonstrated by comparison with the traditional single-sensor strategy. Analysis shows that the proposed dual-sensor strategy in MFL testing can overcome the lift-off disturbance and improve evaluation precision of the defect depth in cases with uncertain lift-off values. This study provides a path for the quantitative evaluation of MFL testing based on the dual-sensor strategy.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Removal of Probe Liftoff Effects on Crack Detection and Sizing in Metals by the AC Field Measurement Technique [J].
Amineh, Reza K. ;
Ravan, Maryam ;
Sadeghi, S. H. Hesamedin ;
Moini, Rouzbeh .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2008, 44 (08) :2066-2073
[2]   3D simulation and experiment on high speed rail MFL inspection [J].
Antipov, A. G. ;
Markov, A. A. .
NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 98 :177-185
[3]   Effects of surface roughness on magnetic flux leakage testing of micro-cracks [J].
Deng, Zhiyang ;
Sun, Yanhua ;
Yang, Yun ;
Kang, Yihua .
MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 28 (04)
[4]   Simulation and Analysis of 3-D Magnetic Flux Leakage [J].
Dutta, Sushant A. ;
Ghorbel, Fathi H. ;
Stanley, Roderic K. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2009, 45 (04) :1966-1972
[5]   THE MAGNETIC LEAKAGE FIELD OF SURFACE-BREAKING CRACKS [J].
EDWARDS, C ;
PALMER, SB .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 1986, 19 (04) :657-673
[6]   Evaluation of defect depth in ferromagnetic materials via magnetic flux leakage method with a double Hall sensor [J].
Hao, Shuai ;
Shi, Pengpeng ;
Su, Sanqing ;
Liang, Tianshou .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS, 2022, 555
[7]   A simulation of magneto-optical eddy current imaging [J].
Le, Minhhuy ;
Lee, Jinyi ;
Shoji, Tetsuo .
NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 44 (08) :783-788
[8]   Window Feature-Based Two-Stage Defect Identification Using Magnetic Flux Leakage Measurements [J].
Liu, Jinhai ;
Fu, Mingrui ;
Liu, Feilong ;
Feng, Jian ;
Cui, Kuangqing .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2018, 67 (01) :12-23
[9]   A Novel Compensation Method of Probe Gesture for Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing [J].
Long, Yue ;
Huang, Songling ;
Peng, Lisha ;
Wang, Shen ;
Zhao, Wei .
IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (09) :10854-10863
[10]   A model for magnetic flux leakage signal predictions [J].
Mandache, C ;
Clapham, L .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 2003, 36 (20) :2427-2431