Investigating the accuracy of mandibulectomy and reconstructive surgery using 3D customized implants and surgical guides in a rabbit model

被引:2
作者
Kim, Min Keun [1 ]
Ham, Min Ji [2 ]
Kim, Won Rae [2 ]
Kim, Hyung Giun [2 ]
Kwon, Kwang Jun [1 ]
Kim, Seong Gon [1 ]
Park, Young Wook [1 ]
机构
[1] Gangneung Wonju Natl Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Kangnung 25457, South Korea
[2] Korea Inst Ind Technol, Funct Mat & Components R&D Grp, Kangnung 25440, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
3D printing; Customized titanium implant; Surgical guide; Accuracy; Rabbit model; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; NECK RECONSTRUCTION; FREE-FLAP; PRECISION; OSTEOTOMY; DEFECTS; SYSTEM; HEAD;
D O I
10.1186/s40902-023-00375-9
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundThis study aimed to analyze the accuracy of the output of three-dimensional (3D) customized surgical guides and titanium implants in a rabbit model, and of mandibulectomy, reconstructive surgery, and surgical outcome; additionally, the correlation between surgical accuracy and surgical outcomes, including the differences in surgical outcome according to surgical accuracy, was analyzed.ResultsThe output of implants was accurately implemented within the error range (- 0.03-0.03 mm), and the surgical accuracy varied depending on the measured area (range - 0.4-1.1 mm). Regarding surgical outcomes, angle between the mandibular lower borders showed the most sensitive results and distance between the lingual cusps of the first molars represented the most accurate outcomes. A significant correlation was noted between surgical accuracy in the anteroposterior length of the upper borders pre- and postoperatively and the angle between the mandibular lower borders (regression coefficient = 0.491, p = 0.028). In the group wherein surgery was performed more accurately, the angle between the mandibular lower borders was reproduced more accurately (p = 0.021). A selective laser melting machine accurately printed the implants as designed. Considering the positive correlation among surgical accuracy in the mandibular upper borders, angle between the mandibular lower borders, and more accurately reproduced angle between the mandibular lower borders, the angle between the mandibular lower borders is considered a good indicator for evaluating the outcomes of reconstructive surgery.ConclusionTo reduce errors in surgical outcomes, it is necessary to devise a positioner for the surgical guide and design a 3D surgical guide to constantly maintain the direction of bone resection. A fixed area considering the concept of three-point fixation should be selected for stable positioning of the implant; in some cases, bilateral cortical bone fixation should be considered. The angle between the mandibular lower borders is a sensitive indicator for evaluating the outcomes of reconstructive surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions [J].
Alasseri, Nasser ;
Alasraj, Ahmed .
MAXILLOFACIAL PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 42 (01)
[2]   3D Printing in Spine Surgery [J].
Cai, Hong ;
Liu, Zhongjun ;
Wei, Feng ;
Yu, Miao ;
Xu, Nanfang ;
Li, Zihe .
INTELLIGENT ORTHOPAEDICS: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND SMART IMAGE-GUIDED TECHNOLOGY FOR ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 1093 :345-359
[3]   Emerging applications of bedside 3D printing in plastic surgery [J].
Chae, Michael P. ;
Rozeni, Warren M. ;
McMenamin, Paul G. ;
Findlay, Michael W. ;
Spychal, Robert T. ;
Hunter-Smith, David J. .
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2015, 2
[4]   Virtual planning and guided surgery in fibular free-flap mandibular reconstruction: A 29-case series [J].
Culie, D. ;
Dassonville, O. ;
Poissonnet, G. ;
Riss, J. -C. ;
Fernandez, J. ;
Bozec, A. .
EUROPEAN ANNALS OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK DISEASES, 2016, 133 (03) :175-178
[5]   Precision of customized surgical osteotomy guide (CSOG) in mandibular reconstruction with a customized implant [J].
Dahake, Sandeep W. ;
Kuthe, Abhaykumar M. ;
Mawale, Mahesh B. .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (10) :1601-1623
[6]   Contribution of 3D printing to mandibular reconstruction after cancer [J].
Dupret-Bories, A. ;
Vergez, S. ;
Meresse, T. ;
Brouillet, F. ;
Bertrand, G. .
EUROPEAN ANNALS OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK DISEASES, 2018, 135 (02) :133-136
[7]   Three-dimensional planning and printing of guides and templates for reconstruction of the mandibular ramus and condyle using autogenous costochondral grafts [J].
Emodi, Omri ;
Shilo, Dekel ;
Israel, Yair ;
Rachmiel, Adi .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 55 (01) :102-104
[8]   Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing of hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone reconstruction in jawbone atrophy: a systematic review and case report [J].
Garagiola U. ;
Grigolato R. ;
Soldo R. ;
Bacchini M. ;
Bassi G. ;
Roncucci R. ;
De Nardi S. .
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 38 (1)
[9]   Recent Applications of Three Dimensional Printing in Cardiovascular Medicine [J].
Gardin, Chiara ;
Ferroni, Letizia ;
Latremouille, Christian ;
Chachques, Juan Carlos ;
Mitrecic, Dinko ;
Zavan, Barbara .
CELLS, 2020, 9 (03)
[10]   The precision of computer-generated surgical splints [J].
Gateno, J ;
Xia, J ;
Teichgraeber, JF ;
Rosen, A ;
Hultgren, B ;
Vadnais, T .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2003, 61 (07) :814-817