Is air pollution a government failure or a market failure? Global evidence from a multi-dimensional analysis

被引:11
作者
Huynh, Cong Minh [1 ,2 ]
Le, Quoc Nha [1 ]
Lam, Thi Huong Tra [1 ]
机构
[1] Eastern Int Univ, Becamex Business Sch, Binh Duong, Vietnam
[2] Eastern Int Univ, Hoa Phu Ward, Becamex Business Sch, Nam Ky Khoi Nghia St, Thu Dau Mot City, Binh Duong Prov, Vietnam
关键词
Air pollution; Free market; Economic freedom; Governance quality; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; PANEL-DATA ANALYSIS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; ECONOMIC-FREEDOM; CO2; EMISSIONS; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; TRADE LIBERALIZATION; INCOME INEQUALITY; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113384
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper studies the impact of the free market (FM) with different dimensions, the quality of governance (QG), and their interaction on air pollution for a global sample of 149 countries during 2000-2020. Results illustrate that FM increases air pollution while QG decreases it for the global sample. Remarkably, the interaction of FM and QG shows that FM increases air pollution until a threshold of QG, then above this level, FM reduces air pollution. However, the impacts of FM, QG, and their interaction on air pollution depend on income levels. In low-income and lower middle-income countries, FM increases air pollution while QG reduces it, but the marginal effect of FM on air pollution in the presence of QG is still statistically positive because the pollution-decreasing effect of QG is weaker than the pollution-increasing effect of FM due to low QG. In upper middle-income and high-income countries, FM, QG, and their interaction reduce air pollution due to high QG; and QG intensifies the reducing effect of FM on air pollution. Moreover, the impact of FM on air pollution depends on various dimensions of FM and the moderating effect of QG for the global sample and sub-samples of different incomecountry groups. The findings imply that low-income and lower middle-income countries should prioritize in improving QG while upper middle-income and high-income countries should prioritize in boosting FM in the battle against air pollution.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   Factors affecting CO2 emission in the Middle East: A panel data analysis [J].
Al-mulali, Usama .
ENERGY, 2012, 44 (01) :564-569
[2]   RETRACTED: The relationship between urbanization, technology innovation, trade openness, and CO2emissions: evidence from a panel of Asian countries (Retracted article. See vol. 29, pg. 9392, 2022) [J].
Amin, Azka ;
Aziz, Babar ;
Liu, Xi-Hua .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (28) :35349-35363
[3]  
Anderson T., 2001, Free market environmentalism, DOI DOI 10.1057/9780312299736
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, World Development Report 2002: Building Institutions for Markets
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Index of Economic Freedom
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1992, GOVERNANCE DEV
[7]   Is free trade good for the environment? [J].
Antweiler, W ;
Copeland, BR ;
Taylor, MS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :877-908
[8]   SOME TESTS OF SPECIFICATION FOR PANEL DATA - MONTE-CARLO EVIDENCE AND AN APPLICATION TO EMPLOYMENT EQUATIONS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOND, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1991, 58 (02) :277-297
[9]   The Role of Renewable Energies for the Sustainable Energy Governance and Environmental Policies for the Mitigation of Climate Change in Ecuador [J].
Arroyo M, Flavio R. ;
Miguel, Luis J. .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (15)
[10]   A new look at the FDI-income-energy-environment nexus: Dynamic panel data analysis of ASEAN [J].
Baek, Jungho .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 91 :22-27