Research Ethics Committee and Integrity Board Members' Collaborative Decision Making in Cases in a Training Setting

被引:1
作者
Lofstrom, E. [1 ]
Pitkanen, H. [2 ]
Cekanauskaite, A. [3 ]
Lukaseviciene, V. [3 ]
Kyllonen, S. [4 ]
Gefenas, E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Fac Educ Sci, Dept Educ, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Jyvaskyla, Fac Educ & Psychol, Dept Teacher Educ, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[3] Vilnius Univ, Inst Hlth Sci, Fac Med, Ctr Hlth Eth Law & Hist, Vilnius, Lithuania
[4] Univ Helsinki, Fac Arts, Dept Philosophy Hist & Art Studies, Helsinki, Finland
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Research ethics; Research integrity; Research ethics committee members; Integrity board members; Ethical decision making; Collaboration; Cases; SENSEMAKING APPROACH; MODEL; EXPERIENCE; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1007/s10805-024-09521-y
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This research focuses on how research ethics committee and integrity board members discuss and decide on solutions to case scenarios that involve a dimension of research ethics or integrity in collaborative settings. The cases involved issues around authorship, conflict of interest, disregard of good scientific practice and ethics review, and research with vulnerable populations (children and neonates). The cases were set in a university, a hospital, or a research institute. In the research, we used a deductive qualitative approach with thematic analysis. Twenty-seven research ethics committee and research integrity board members from 16 European countries and one country outside Europe participated. Participants represented natural and life sciences, social sciences, and humanities. They worked on cases involving ethical/integrity issues in six different constellations. Results show that experts apply key elements of ethical decision making, namely identification of ethical issues, stakeholders, guidelines, solutions, and own positionality, in dealing collaboratively with ethics/ integrity problems, and the nature of the application depends on the complexity of the case. Understanding how individuals knowledgeable in research ethics and integrity, in this case, individuals serving on research ethics committees and integrity boards, approach ethical/ moral issues can help to identify strategies that may be useful in the development of research ethics and integrity training for junior researchers who may benefit from learning professional strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 63
页数:25
相关论文
共 73 条
[21]   Validating an ethical decision-making model of assessment using authentic scenarios [J].
Gao, Ruiqin ;
Liu, Jin ;
Johnson, Robert ;
Wang, Jiandong ;
Hu, Ling .
STUDIES IN EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION, 2019, 62 :187-196
[22]  
Good Clinical Practice Network, STUDY 2 IMINOBIOTIN
[23]  
Graham M., 2012, Measuring and Promoting Inter-Rater Agreement of Teacher and Principal Performance Ratings
[24]  
Green J., 2009, International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, V4, P1
[25]   The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment [J].
Haidt, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (04) :814-834
[26]   Education of research ethics for clinical investigators with Moodle tool [J].
Halkoaho, Arja ;
Matveinen, Mari ;
Leinonen, Ville ;
Luoto, Kirsi ;
Keranen, Tapani .
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2013, 14
[27]   Coding Ethical Decision-Making in Research [J].
Hartmann, David J. ;
Van Valey, Thomas ;
Fuqua, Wayne .
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2017, 23 (01) :121-146
[28]   A qualitative study investigating the ethical decision making process: A proposed model [J].
Heyler, Scott G. ;
Armenakis, Achilles A. ;
Walker, Alan G. ;
Collier, Donovan Y. .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2016, 27 (05) :788-801
[29]   Beyond Criticism of Ethics Review Boards: Strategies for Engaging Research Communities and Enhancing Ethical Review Processes [J].
Hickey, Andrew ;
Davis, Samantha ;
Farmer, Will ;
Dawidowicz, Julianna ;
Moloney, Clint ;
Lamont-Mills, Andrea ;
Carniel, Jess ;
Pillay, Yosheen ;
Akenson, David ;
Bromdal, Annette ;
Gehrmann, Richard ;
Mills, Dean ;
Kolbe-Alexander, Tracy ;
Machin, Tanya ;
Reich, Suzanne ;
Southey, Kim ;
Crowley-Cyr, Lynda ;
Watanabe, Taiji ;
Davenport, Josh ;
Hirani, Rohit ;
King, Helena ;
Perera, Roshini ;
Williams, Lucy ;
Timmins, Kurt ;
Thompson, Michael ;
Eacersall, Douglas ;
Maxwell, Jacinta .
JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC ETHICS, 2022, 20 (04) :549-567
[30]   Ethical decision-making models: a taxonomy of models and review of issues [J].
Johnson, Melanie K. ;
Weeks, Sean N. ;
Peacock, Gretchen Gimpel ;
Domenech Rodriguez, Melanie M. .
ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2022, 32 (03) :195-+