Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations using machine-learning-assisted agar dilution

被引:1
作者
Gerada, Alessandro [1 ,2 ]
Harper, Nicholas [1 ]
Howard, Alex [1 ,2 ]
Reza, Nada [1 ]
Hope, William [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Inst Syst Mol & Integrat Biol, Dept Pharmacol & Therapeut, Antimicrobial Pharmacodynam & Therapeut Grp, Liverpool, England
[2] Liverpool Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust Royal, Dept Infect & Immun, Liverpool Clin Labs, Clin Support Serv Bldg CSSB,Liverpool Site, Liverpool, England
来源
MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM | 2024年 / 12卷 / 05期
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
antimicrobial resistance; minimum inhibitory concentration; artificial intelligence; machine learning; assay validation; image recognition; laboratory software; digital health; SUSCEPTIBILITY; IDENTIFICATION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1128/spectrum.04209-23
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Effective policy to address the global threat of antimicrobial resistance requires robust antimicrobial susceptibility data. Traditional methods for measuring minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) are resource intensive, subject to human error, and require considerable infrastructure. AIgarMIC streamlines and standardizes MIC measurement and is especially valuable for large-scale surveillance activities. MICs were measured using agar dilution for n = 10 antibiotics against clinical Enterobacterales isolates (n = 1,086) obtained from a large tertiary hospital microbiology laboratory. Escherichia coli (n = 827, 76%) was the most common organism. Photographs of agar plates were divided into smaller images covering one inoculation site. A labeled data set of colony images was created and used to train a convolutional neural network to classify images based on whether a bacterial colony was present (first-step model). If growth was present, a second-step model determined whether colony morphology suggested antimicrobial growth inhibition. The ability of the AI to determine MIC was then compared with standard visual determination. The first-step model classified bacterial growth as present/absent with 94.3% accuracy. The second-step model classified colonies as "inhibited" or "good growth" with 88.6% accuracy. For the determination of MIC, the rate of essential agreement was 98.9% (644/651), with a bias of -7.8%, compared with manual annotation. AIgarMIC uses artificial intelligence to automate endpoint assessments for agar dilution and potentially increases throughput without bespoke equipment. AIgarMIC reduces laboratory barriers to generating high-quality MIC data that can be used for large-scale surveillance programs.IMPORTANCEThis research uses modern artificial intelligence and machine-learning approaches to standardize and automate the interpretation of agar dilution minimum inhibitory concentration testing. Artificial intelligence is currently of significant topical interest to researchers and clinicians. In our manuscript, we demonstrate a use-case in the microbiology laboratory and present validation data for the model's performance against manual interpretation. This research uses modern artificial intelligence and machine-learning approaches to standardize and automate the interpretation of agar dilution minimum inhibitory concentration testing. Artificial intelligence is currently of significant topical interest to researchers and clinicians. In our manuscript, we demonstrate a use-case in the microbiology laboratory and present validation data for the model's performance against manual interpretation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Comparison of Agar Dilution to Broth Microdilution for Testing In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol against Gram-Negative Bacilli
    Albano, Mariana
    Karau, Melissa J.
    Schuetz, Audrey N.
    Patel, Robin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 59 (01)
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, DEEP LEARNING PYTHON, P25
  • [3] [Anonymous], BIOMIC V3 MICROBIOLO
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2021, ISO 20776 22021
  • [5] Comparison of efficacy and cost-effectiveness of BIOMIC VIDEO and vitek antimicrobial susceptibility test systems for use in the clinical microbiology laboratory
    Berke, I
    Tierno, PM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 34 (08) : 1980 - 1984
  • [6] Evaluation of the BD phoenix automated microbiology system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae
    Carroll, Karen C.
    Glanz, Brian D.
    Borek, Anita P.
    Burger, Chad
    Bhally, Hasan S.
    Henciak, Susan
    Flayhart, Diane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 44 (10) : 3506 - 3509
  • [7] Chollet F., 2015, Keras
  • [8] CLSI, 2023, CLSI supplement M100, V33rd
  • [9] Susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria: Evaluation of the redesigned (Version 96) bioMerieux ATB ANA device
    Dubreuil, L
    Houcke, I
    Singer, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 37 (06) : 1824 - 1828
  • [10] EUCAST, 2017, MIC DISTRIBUTIONS EP