Implementation and Perceived Effectiveness of Prospective Audit and Feedback and Preauthorization by US Pediatric Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs

被引:1
作者
Manice, Christina S. [1 ,5 ]
Muralidhar, Nivedita [1 ]
Campbell, Jeffrey, I [2 ,3 ]
Nakamura, Mari M. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Boston Childrens Hosp, Div Pediat Infect Dis, 300 Longwood Ave Mailstop BCH 3118, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Pediat, Boston, MA USA
[3] Boston Univ, Chobanian & Avedisian Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Boston, MA USA
[4] Boston Childrens Hosp, Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Pediat, Boston, MA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
antimicrobial stewardship; focus groups; preauthorization; prospective audit and feedback; INFECTIOUS-DISEASES SOCIETY; HEALTH-CARE EPIDEMIOLOGY; ANTIBIOTIC STEWARDSHIP; GUIDELINES; AMERICA;
D O I
10.1093/jpids/piad112
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) promote optimal antimicrobial use to prevent resistance, improve outcomes, and reduce costs. We explored how pediatric ASPs enact prospective audit and feedback (PAF) and preauthorization and characterized programs' perceptions of how these choices affected attainment of stewardship goals.Methods We conducted focus groups with US pediatric ASP practitioners, organized by predominant strategy: PAF, preauthorization, or a hybrid. We asked open-ended questions about organization, staffing, and operation of these strategies, as well as rationales for and perceived advantages and disadvantages of these choices. We used applied thematic analysis to analyze transcripts, organizing coded text into themes and categories. We formulated a conceptual model for how the design and performance of PAF and preauthorization affect stewardship goals and stewards' work experiences.Results Eighteen physicians and 14 pharmacists from 24 hospitals participated in five focus groups. Stewards described myriad advantages and limitations of PAF and preauthorization that support or detract from stewardship goals. For example, PAF uncovered institutional trends in antibiotic use and fostered relationship building but was time-consuming. Preauthorization efficiently reduced broad-spectrum antimicrobial use, yet offered limited educational opportunities. How these strategies facilitated or impeded appropriate antimicrobial use in turn affected stewards' professional satisfaction, creating a feedback loop that could reinforced positive or negative outcomes.Conclusions ASPs reported differing emphasis on and implementation of PAF and preauthorization. Each strategy entailed contrasting benefits and trade-offs for steward satisfaction and perceived efficacy, suggesting that a hybrid approach could enable ASPs to maximize strengths of each to mitigate drawbacks of the other. Focus groups with pediatric antimicrobial stewards demonstrated variable implementation of prospective audit and feedback and preauthorization. We developed a model identifying how key drivers and mediators associated with these strategies affect perceived antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) efficacy and steward satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 122
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Feasibility of Core Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions in Community Hospitals
    Anderson, Deverick J.
    Watson, Shera
    Moehring, Rebekah W.
    Komarow, Lauren
    Finnemeyer, Matthew
    Arias, Rebekka M.
    Huvane, Jacqueline
    Hill, Carol Bova
    Deckard, Nancie
    Sexton, Daniel J.
    Bartlett, John
    Bonomo, Robert A.
    Chambers, Henry, III
    Cosgrove, Sara Elizabeth
    Cross, Heather R.
    Dixon, Dennis
    Doi, Yohei
    Evans, Scott
    Fowler, Vance Garrison
    Ghazaryan, Varduhi
    Hanson, Kimberly E.
    Harris, Anthony D.
    Knisely, Jane
    Kreiswirth, Barry
    Lodise, Thomas
    Miller, Loren G.
    Norice-Tra, Carmelle
    Obasi, Chidi
    Patel, Robin
    Pettigrew, Melinda
    Zaoutis, Theoklis
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (08)
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, PRES UGA 71 SESS 201
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2023, Leverage clinical resource utilization data
  • [4] Barlam TF, 2016, CLIN INFECT DIS, V62, pE51, DOI 10.1093/cid/ciw118
  • [5] The Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Research
    Carter, Nancy
    Bryant-Lukosius, Denise
    DiCenso, Alba
    Blythe, Jennifer
    Neville, Alan J.
    [J]. ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2014, 41 (05) : 545 - 547
  • [6] Core Elements of Hospital Antibiotic Stewardship Programs, 2021, ANTIBIOTIC USE
  • [7] Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship
    Dellit, Timothy H.
    Owens, Robert C.
    McGowan, John E., Jr.
    Gerding, Dale N.
    Weinstein, Robert A.
    Burke, John P.
    Huskins, W. Charles
    Paterson, David L.
    Fishman, Neil O.
    Carpenter, Christopher F.
    Brennan, P. J.
    Billeter, Marianne
    Hooton, Thomas M.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 44 (02) : 159 - 177
  • [8] Implementation and impact of pediatric antimicrobial stewardship programs: a systematic scoping review
    Dona, D.
    Barbieri, E.
    Daverio, M.
    Lundin, R.
    Giaquinto, C.
    Zaoutis, T.
    Sharland, M.
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE AND INFECTION CONTROL, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [9] Policy Statement: Antibiotic Stewardship in Pediatrics
    Gerber, Jeffrey S.
    Jackson, Mary Anne
    Tamma, Pranita D.
    Zaoutis, Theoklis E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASES SOCIETY, 2021, 10 (05) : 641 - 649
  • [10] Pediatric Antimicrobial Stewardship: State of the Art
    Godbout, Emily J.
    Pakyz, Amy L.
    Markley, John Daniel
    Noda, Andrew J.
    Stevens, Michael P.
    [J]. CURRENT INFECTIOUS DISEASE REPORTS, 2018, 20 (10)