Perceptions of Civil Servant Corruption: A Cross-Country Analysis

被引:3
作者
Moltz, Michael C. [1 ]
Morelock, Andrew L. [2 ]
Simon, Christopher A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Shippensburg Univ Penn, Shippensburg, PA 17257 USA
[2] Marshall Univ, Huntington, WV USA
[3] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
Bureaucratic corruption; public perceptions; worldwide governance indicators; POLITICAL TRUST; INSTITUTIONAL TRUST; SOCIAL TRUST; PUBLIC TRUST; E-GOVERNMENT; SATISFACTION; DEMOCRACY; GENDER; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1080/10999922.2023.2262208
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Distrust in the civil service is not unique to any country but felt across much of the globe amid ascendant populist movements. A significant correlate of distrust in the civil service is the perception of corruption among bureaucrats. Our research addresses two main questions. First, in OECD countries, to what extent does the public view bureaucrats as corrupt? Second, what factors explain these perceptions? Data from 23 countries in the International Social Survey Programme's 2016 Role of Government survey are analyzed using multilevel logistic regression models. Among the explanatory variables included in this multilevel analysis are respondents' exposure to bribery, political party support, and political efficacy. Country-level correlates drawn from the 2016 Worldwide Governance Indicators are analyzed to explore the impact of governance quality on corruption perceptions. Results indicate that better quality of government is associated with lower perceptions of bureaucratic corruption. Likewise, notable individual-level findings suggest political efficacy and exposure to corruption are significantly associated with corruption perceptions.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 359
页数:14
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Mitigating Corruption in Sub-Saharan Africa: Does Heterogeneity in Corruption Levels Matter? [J].
Amegavi, George Babington ;
Quarshie, Abigail ;
Mensah, James Kwame .
PUBLIC INTEGRITY, 2021, :229-242
[2]   Community Psychology, Political Efficacy, and Trust [J].
Anderson, Mary R. .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 31 (01) :59-84
[3]  
[Anonymous], What is corruption?
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Worldwide Governance Indicators
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Public Trust in Government: 1958-2022
[6]   How does social trust lead to better governance? An attempt to separate electoral and bureaucratic mechanisms [J].
Bjornskov, Christian .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2010, 144 (1-2) :323-346
[7]   Perceptions of political corruption in Latin American democracies [J].
Canache, D ;
Allison, ME .
LATIN AMERICAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY, 2005, 47 (03) :91-111
[8]   The origins and consequences of public trust in government - A time series analysis [J].
Chanley, VA ;
Rudolph, TJ ;
Rahn, WM .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2000, 64 (03) :239-256
[9]  
Choi E., 2014, INT STUD REV, V15, P1, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1163/2667078X-01502001, DOI 10.1163/2667078X-01502001]
[10]   Political Trust in a Cynical Age [J].
Citrin, Jack ;
Stoker, Laura .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, VOL 21, 2018, 21 :49-70