Gendered Division of Housework in Slovak Couples: Life Course and Other Factors

被引:2
作者
Bod'a, Martin [1 ,2 ]
Povazanova, Mariana [1 ]
Nedelova, Gabriela [1 ]
Vallusova, Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Matej Bel Univ Banska Bystr, Fac Econ, Tajovskeho 10, Banska Bystrica 97590, Slovakia
[2] Jan Evangelista Purkyne Univ Banska Bystr, Fac Nat Sci, Pasteurova 15, Usti Nad Labem 40096, Czech Republic
关键词
Gendered division of household labor; Life course; Time availability; Relative resources; Gender ideology; Slovak couples; HOUSEHOLD LABOR; OF-LABOR; DOMESTIC WORK; UNPAID WORK; TIME-USE; ECONOMIC DEPENDENCY; COURSE TRANSITIONS; FAMILY TIME; CHILD-CARE; PARENTHOOD;
D O I
10.1007/s10834-023-09926-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The paper examines factors that explain the allocation of time and the gendered division of routine, non-routine and care activities in Slovak households. It departs from the extant literature in three notable respects. First, the division of household labor between partners is studied for Slovakia, a former Socialist country with a specific family and societal context, where female labor force participation evolved differently from Western market economies. Second, in conjunction with the established theories of gendering housework (the time availability, relative resources and gender ideology hypotheses), the explanation takes a life course perspective that breaks households down into five life stages by the presence and age of children. Third, the methodology considers simultaneity in the time spent on different tasks and in its division between the genders by adopting a model of seemingly unrelated regression equations. Slovak males are found to spend on average more time in paid employment and devote far fewer hours to unpaid routine housework than females do. Life cycle stages are found to be a reliable predictor especially for hours spent and the gendered division of care work. Life stages are manifested mainly in time use of women, whereas men adjust their time use only when their assistance is needed with children. Time allocation and the gendered division of routine and non-routine chores are primarily explained by income-based and education-based relative resources, whilst patterns of care work are in line with the life course rather than explained by time availability.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 671
页数:23
相关论文
共 105 条
[1]   Desperate Housework Relative Resources, Time Availability, Economic Dependency, and Gender Ideology Across Europe [J].
Aassve, Arnstein ;
Fuochi, Giulia ;
Mencarini, Letizia .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY ISSUES, 2014, 35 (08) :1000-1022
[2]  
Albertini M., 2016, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 7678, DOI [10.13140/RG.2.1.1967.4488, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.1967.4488]
[3]   Grandparents, family solidarity and the division of housework: evidence from the Italian case [J].
Albertini, Marco ;
Tosi, Marco .
GENUS, 2022, 78 (01)
[4]   Gender effect on housework allocation: Evidence from Spanish two-earner couples [J].
Alvarez, B ;
Miles, D .
JOURNAL OF POPULATION ECONOMICS, 2003, 16 (02) :227-242
[5]   MULTIVARIATE REGRESSION AND SIMULTANEOUS EQUATION MODELS WHEN DEPENDENT VARIABLES ARE TRUNCATED NORMAL [J].
AMEMIYA, T .
ECONOMETRICA, 1974, 42 (06) :999-1012
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2020, OECD EMPLOYMENT OUTL, DOI DOI 10.1787/1686C758-EN
[7]   GENDER DIFFERENCES IN TIME USE OVER THE LIFE COURSE IN FRANCE, ITALY, SWEDEN, AND THE US [J].
Anxo, Dominique ;
Mencarini, Letizia ;
Pailhe, Ariane ;
Solaz, Anne ;
Tanturri, Maria Letizia ;
Flood, Lennart .
FEMINIST ECONOMICS, 2011, 17 (03) :159-195
[8]   Gender, time use, and public policy over the life cycle [J].
Apps, P ;
Rees, R .
OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2005, 21 (03) :439-461
[9]   The Effect of a First Born Child on Work and Childcare Time Allocation: Pre-post Analysis of Australian Couples [J].
Argyrous, George ;
Craig, Lyn ;
Rahman, Sara .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2017, 131 (02) :831-851
[10]   Life course transitions and housework: Marriage, parenthood, and time on housework [J].
Baxter, Janeen ;
Hewitt, Belinda ;
Haynes, Michele .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2008, 70 (02) :259-272