It Takes a Village to Trust Science: Towards a (Thoroughly) Social Approach to Public Trust in Science

被引:24
作者
Contessa, Gabriele [1 ]
机构
[1] Carleton Univ, Philosophy Dept, Patterson 3A46,1125 Colonel By Dr, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
EPISTEMIC TRUST; OF-INTEREST; DEMOCRACY;
D O I
10.1007/s10670-021-00485-8
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
In this paper, I distinguish three general approaches to public trust in science, which I call the individual approach, the semi-social approach, and the social approach, and critically examine their proposed solutions to what I call the problem of harmful distrust. I argue that, despite their differences, the individual and the semi-social approaches see the solution to the problem of harmful distrust as consisting primarily in trying to persuade individual citizens to trust science and that both approaches face two general problems, which I call the problem of overidealizing science and the problem of overburdening citizens. I then argue that in order to avoid these problems we need to embrace a (thoroughly) social approach to public trust in science, which emphasizes the social dimensions of the reception, transmission, and uptake of scientific knowledge in society and the ways in which social forces influence both positively and negatively the trustworthiness of science.
引用
收藏
页码:2941 / 2966
页数:26
相关论文
共 75 条
[61]   Novelty versus Replicability: Virtues and Vices in the Reward System of Science [J].
Romero, Felipe .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2017, 84 (05) :1031-1043
[62]  
Rudner R., 1953, PHILOS SCI, V20, P1, DOI DOI 10.1086/287231
[63]  
Salvanto Anthony, 2021, CBS News
[64]  
Scheman Naomi., 2001, Engendering Rationalities, P23
[65]   Democratic Values: A Better Foundation for Public Trust in Science [J].
Schroeder, S. Andrew .
BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2021, 72 (02) :545-562
[66]   Pharmaceutical company funding and its consequences: A qualitative systematic review [J].
Sismondo, Sergio .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2008, 29 (02) :109-113
[67]  
Solomon M., 2001, Social Empiricism, DOI [10.7551/mitpress/6296.001.0001, DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/6296.001.0001]
[68]   ECHO CHAMBERS AND EPISTEMIC BUBBLES [J].
Thi Nguyen, C. .
EPISTEME-A JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2020, 17 (02) :141-161
[69]  
Tsipursky G., 2018, SCI AM BLOG NETWORK
[70]  
Tucker William., 1994, The Science and Politics of Racial Research