Cumulative effects of fragmentation and development on highly productive land in New Zealand

被引:11
作者
Curran-Cournane, Fiona [1 ]
Carrick, Sam [2 ]
Barnes, Michelle G. [3 ]
Ausseil, Anne-Gaelle [4 ]
Drewry, John J. [3 ]
Bain, Isaac A. [5 ]
Golubiewski, Nancy E. [1 ]
Jones, Haydon S. [6 ]
Barringer, James [2 ]
Morell, Lance [7 ]
机构
[1] Minist Environm, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Manaaki Whenua Landcare Res, Lincoln, New Zealand
[3] Manaaki Whenua Landcare Res, Palmerston North, New Zealand
[4] Manaaki Whenua Landcare Res, Wellington, New Zealand
[5] Minist Environm, Wellington, New Zealand
[6] Waikato Reg Council, Waikato, New Zealand
[7] Stat New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
关键词
Land fragmentation; urban expansion; versatile land; cumulative effects; New Zealand; national policy; national reporting; URBAN EXPANSION; FARMLAND;
D O I
10.1080/00288233.2021.1918185
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Land fragmentation is a growing issue in New Zealand, however, no consistent or regular national monitoring has been established. A methodology for assessing land fragmentation was applied nationally for the first time, revealing that the greatest proportion of fragmentation occurred on land used for diffuse rural residence (>0.40 to <= 2.0 ha) and small parcels (>2.0 to <= 8.0 ha) with a 128% and 73% increase, respectively, between 2002 and 2019. In New Zealand, the most highly productive land (Land Use Capability (LUC) class 1, 2 and 3) is most impacted by continued fragmentation with 38%, 28% and 17% of baseline area, respectively, occupied by medium sized parcels or smaller (<= 40.0 ha) with a dwelling in 2019. Impacts were greatest for Auckland with 40%, 44% and 25% of the region's LUC 1, 2 and 3 land, respectively, occupied by small sized parcels or smaller with a dwelling, increasing to 64%, 67% and 47%, respectively, when including parcels <= 40.0 ha. Protection of LUC class 1 and 2 land, particularly, requires national attention. This metric provides an opportunity to evaluate land fragmentation and development over time that could serve both the assessment of policy performance and environmental reporting at national and regional levels.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 24
页数:24
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Agriculture New Zealand, 1994, CLASS SYST PROD LAND
[2]  
Aitken AG., 2019, FRESHFACTS
[3]   Expansion of lifestyle blocks and urban areas onto high-class land: an update for planning and policy [J].
Andrew, R. ;
Dymond, J. R. .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND, 2013, 43 (03) :128-140
[4]  
Androkovich R., 2008, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, V40, P999
[5]   British Columbia's agricultural land reserve: Economic, legal and political issues [J].
Androkovich, Robert A. .
LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 30 (01) :365-372
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Topo Data Dictionary Coastline
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2020, FY 2019-2020 Immigration Examinations Fee Account: Fee Review Supporting Documentation with Addendum, P17
[8]  
AsureQuality, 2020, AGR 2020
[9]  
Auckland City, 2008, AUCKL CIT COUNC REG
[10]  
Auckland Council, 2016, AUCKL UN PLAN OP PAR