Adequacy of Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade with or without Train-of-Four Monitoring: A Randomised Controlled Study

被引:0
|
作者
Kadur, Siddesh N. [1 ]
Devi, Gayathri M. [2 ]
机构
[1] SDM Med Coll, Dept Anaesthesiol, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
[2] Manipal Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, 98 HAL Old Airport Rd, Bangalore 560017, Karnataka, India
关键词
Extubation; Muscle relaxants; Neostigmine; Paralysis; Residual; BLOCKING-AGENTS; RESIDUAL PARALYSIS; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2023/66898.18752
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Adequate reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade (NMB) is essential when using muscle relaxants to avoid residual paralysis postoperatively. Reversal can be achieved using clinical parameters or, alternatively, by Train-of-Four (TOF) monitoring.Aim: To evaluate the adequacy of successful NMB reversal using clinical parameters-based endpoints compared to using TOF monitoring.Materials and Methods: The hospital-based randomised controlled study conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology, SDM Medical College, Dharwad, Karnataka, India for a peroid of two years from November 2019 to December 2021. Consisted of 120 subjects divided into two groups: Group-C (Clinical parameters) and group T (TOF monitoring), aged 18-60 years of either sex with American Soceity of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II, undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring intubation. Extubation was achieved in group C using clinical parameters like return of spontaneous respiratory efforts, adequate Tidal Volume (TV) (>= 5 mL/kg), obeying simple commands, absence of excessive secretions, and in group T using TOF monitoring. The t-test was used to compare the difference between the groups. The Chi-square test was done for contingency data. A p-value of less than or equal to 0.05 (p-value <= 0.05) indicates statistical significance.Results: In the study, both group C and group T were comparable in terms of age {(41.15 +/- 10.23 years, 41.03 +/- 11.9 years) p-value=0.95}, sex (m/f) {(46.6%/53.3% and 63.3%/36.6%) p-value=0.06}, and Basal Metabolic Index (BMI) {<= 25=59.1%, 2530=33.3%, >_30=7.5%, p-value=0.57}, respectively. Five patients in group C had residual paralysis, whereas none in group T. Reversal-extubation time in minutes (min) in group C {5.9 +/- 2.2, 5.4 (2-15.2)} and group T {6.6 +/- 1.9, 6.24 (3.3-12.2)} (p-value=0.07), TOF value at the time of extubation in group C {72.1 +/- 11.6, 72 (41-91)}, group T {72.75 +/- 2.74, 72 (70-79)} (p-value=0.69). TOF value after 10 minutes of extubation in group C {92.5 +/- 7.1, 94 (66100)} and group T {95.6 +/- 2.7, 96 (90-100)} (p-value=0.006).Conclusion: The TOF monitoring is better compared to a clinical parameters-based reversal strategy in reducing the incidence of residual paralysis and resulting complications whenever Neuromuscular Blocking Agents (NMBAs) are used. Hence, it is desirable to use Neuromuscular Monitoring with the use of NMBAs.
引用
收藏
页码:UC33 / UC37
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of train-of-four count by anesthesia providers versus TOF-WatchA® SX: a prospective cohort study
    Bhananker, Sanjay M.
    Treggiari, Miriam M.
    Sellers, Brittany A.
    Cain, Kevin C.
    Ramaiah, Ramesh
    Thilen, Stephan R.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2015, 62 (10): : 1089 - 1096
  • [32] Reversing Neuromuscular Blockade without Nerve Stimulator Guidance in a Postsurgical ICU-An Observational Study
    Calef, Andrea
    Castelgrande, Rashel
    Crawley, Kristin
    Dorris, Sara
    Durham, Joanna
    Lee, Kaitlin
    Paras, Jen
    Piazza, Kristen
    Race, Abigail
    Rider, Laura
    Shelley, Michael
    Stewart, Emily
    Tamok, Miranda
    Tate, Jennifer
    Dodd-o, Jeffrey M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (09)
  • [33] A prospective randomized comparison of train-of-four monitoring and clinical assessment during continuous ICU cisatracurium paralysis
    Baumann, MH
    McAlpin, BW
    Brown, K
    Patel, P
    Ahmad, I
    Stewart, R
    Petrini, M
    CHEST, 2004, 126 (04) : 1267 - 1273
  • [34] Dosing, Monitoring, and Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade: Are Anesthesiologists Following Evidence-Based Practices?
    Asbahi M.
    Soto R.
    Current Anesthesiology Reports, 2016, 6 (2) : 160 - 163
  • [35] Use of Sugammadex for Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade in 2 Patients Requiring Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring
    Reid, Stewart
    Shields, Martin O.
    Luney, Steven R.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 23 (01) : 56 - 57
  • [36] Effects of sugammadex on deep neuromuscular blockade reversal in laparoscopic colorectal resection: a prospective observational study
    Phan, Vu Ton Ngoc
    Nguyen, Dung Thien
    Phi, Hue Thi
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2025, 29 (02) : 194 - 201
  • [37] Predictive study of pharmacological reversal for residual neuromuscular blockade and postoperative pulmonary complications: a prospective, observational, cohort study
    Aragon-Benedi, Cristian
    Pascual-Bellosta, Ana
    Ortega-Lucea, Sonia
    Visiedo-Sanchez, Sara
    Martinez-Ubieto, Javier
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [38] Effects of sugammadex on incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade: a randomized, controlled study
    Brueckmann, B.
    Sasaki, N.
    Grobara, P.
    Li, M. K.
    Woo, T.
    de Bie, J.
    Maktabi, M.
    Lee, J.
    Kwo, J.
    Pino, R.
    Sabouri, A. S.
    McGovern, F.
    Staehr-Rye, A. K.
    Eikermann, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 115 (05) : 743 - 751
  • [39] Recovery characteristics of patients receiving either sugammadex or neostigmine and glycopyrrolate for reversal of neuromuscular block: a randomised controlled trial
    Paech, M. J.
    Kaye, R.
    Baber, C.
    Nathan, E. A.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 73 (03) : 340 - 347
  • [40] Performing post-tetanic count during rocuronium blockade has limited impact on subsequent twitch height or train-of-four responses
    Hakim, David
    Drolet, Pierre
    Donati, Francois
    Fortier, Louis-Philippe
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2016, 63 (07): : 828 - 833