Comparative study of machine learning techniques to predict fuel consumption of a marine diesel engine

被引:16
作者
Yuksel, Onur [1 ]
Bayraktar, Murat [1 ]
Sokukcu, Mustafa [2 ]
机构
[1] Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit Univ, Maritime Fac, Zonguldak, Turkiye
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Maritime Fac, Izmir, Turkiye
关键词
Marine diesel engines; Support vector regression; Multiple linear regression; J48 pruned tree; M5; rules; Machine learning; ABSOLUTE ERROR MAE; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; SHIPS; RMSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115505
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
The motivation of this study is to compare four different machine learning algorithms which are support vector regression, multiple linear regression, J48 pruned tree, and M5 Rules, to predict the fuel consumption (FC) of a large marine diesel engine utilized as the main engine on a tanker vessel. This study aims to fill a literature gap by comparing two algorithms, which have not been used for this problem in the rule and tree-based literature, with the other two frequently used algorithms. The data gathered from noon reports and the logbook of an oceangoing tanker vessel involves the operational and environmental parameters. The model performances, prediction accuracy, and error deviations on the test set are demonstrated. The importance of each feature on fuel consumption is discussed regarding the rules created by the algorithms. The M5 Rules algorithm has the highest performance with the truest predictions with a correlation score of 0.9666, mean absolute error of 2.3536, and root mean squared error of 3.3947. Slip, speed, distance, and wind direction are the operational and environmental dependent variables that have more influence on the FC. M5 Rules algorithm has provided a clear sorting for each feature's importance regarding conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] The energy efficiency effects of periodic ship hull cleaning
    Adland, Roar
    Cariou, Pierre
    Jia, Haiying
    Wolff, Francois-Charles
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 178 : 1 - 13
  • [2] Akyuz Emre, 2019, Procedia Computer Science, V158, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.052
  • [3] Andersen P, 2005, MAR TECHNOL SNAME N, V42, P177
  • [4] Awad M., 2015, EFFICIENT LEARNING M, P67, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4302-5990-9
  • [5] Ship speed prediction based on machine learning for efficient shipping operation
    Bassam, Ameen M.
    Phillips, Alexander B.
    Turnock, Stephen R.
    Wilson, Philip A.
    [J]. OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2022, 245
  • [6] Baumann S., 2019, CEAS Aeronaut. J., V11, P277, DOI DOI 10.1007/S13272-019-00422-0
  • [7] Bayraktar M., 2023, Marine vessel energy efficiency performance prediction based on daily reported noon reports, DOI [10.1080/17445302.2023.2214490, DOI 10.1080/17445302.2023.2214490]
  • [8] On the estimation of ship's fuel consumption and speed curve: A statistical approach
    Bialystocki, Nicolas
    Konovessis, Dimitris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCEAN ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, 2016, 1 (02) : 157 - 166
  • [9] Determination of the weights of external conditions for ship resistance
    Bilgili, Levent
    [J]. OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2023, 276
  • [10] Cross-validation methods
    Browne, MW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 44 (01) : 108 - 132