Seismic fragility assessment of storage tanks considering different sources of uncertainty

被引:12
作者
Wang, Mengzhu [1 ]
Sun, Zongguang [1 ]
Sun, Jiangang [2 ,3 ]
Cui, Lifu [2 ]
Lyu, Yuan [4 ]
Wu, Yujian [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Maritime Univ, Coll Transportat Engn, Dalian, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Minzu Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Dalian, Peoples R China
[3] Inst Disaster Prevent, Coll Civil Engn, Sanhe, Peoples R China
[4] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Floating-roof storage tank; Sensitivity analysis; Seismic demand; Fragility analysis; Uncertainty; INTENSITY MEASURES; SCALAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114972
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Liquid storage tanks are critical facilities in petroleum depots that must remain intact and functional following an earthquake. The seismic fragility function is a useful tool for quantifying structural vulnerability. This study accordingly explored the effects of different uncertainties on the seismic fragility of a case study floating-roof storage tank by applying an appropriate approach to seismic fragility analysis. First, an orthogonal sensitivity analysis was performed using a finite element model to determine the random model variables most affecting the seismic responses of the storage tank. Considering the different sources of uncertainty, seismic fragility was subsequently evaluated by combining a cloud analysis with model sampling. Then, the seismic fragility curves of the storage tank system were developed by studying the correlations among multiple failure modes. The results indicate that the computational requirements of the present method were significantly less demanding than those of direct Monte Carlo simulation. Geometric uncertainty was found to exert the greatest impact on the seismic responses. The maximum difference among the fragility function parameters for different sources of uncertainty was 28.9%. The damage assessment of the tank system was shown to be more reasonable when considering the correlations among multiple failure modes. This analysis technique can accordingly provide practical guidance for the seismic design of vertical floating-roof storage tanks.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Probabilistic risk analysis of process plants under seismic loading based on Monte Carlo simulations [J].
Alessandri, S. ;
Caputo, A. C. ;
Corritore, D. ;
Giannini, R. ;
Paolacci, F. ;
Phan, H. N. .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2018, 53 :136-148
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, 503412014 GB
[3]   Elastic and viscous bumpers for seismic mitigation of base-isolated liquid storage tanks in near-fault zones [J].
Bagheri, Saman ;
Farajian, Mostafa .
JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND CONTROL, 2023, 29 (17-18) :4334-4343
[4]   Seismic Performance Evaluation of Liquid Storage Tanks Using Nonlinear Static Procedures [J].
Bakalis, Konstantinos ;
Kazantzi, Athanasia K. ;
Vamvatsikos, Dimitrios ;
Fragiadakis, Michalis .
JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2019, 141 (01)
[5]   Seismic risk assessment of liquid storage tanks via a nonlinear surrogate model [J].
Bakalis, Konstantinos ;
Vamvatsikos, Dimitrios ;
Fragiadakis, Michalis .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2017, 46 (15) :2851-2868
[6]  
Baker JackW., 2006, Vector-valued ground motion intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis
[7]   Seismic Performance of Storage Steel Tanks during the May 2012 Emilia, Italy, Earthquakes [J].
Brunesi, Emanuele ;
Nascimbene, Roberto ;
Pagani, Marco ;
Beilic, Dumitru .
JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2015, 29 (05)
[8]   Dynamic buckling and seismic fragility of anchored steel tanks by the added mass method [J].
Buratti, N. ;
Tavano, M. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2014, 43 (01) :1-21
[9]   Seismic performance of a floating roof in an unanchored broad storage tank: Experimental tests and numerical simulations [J].
Caprinozzi, Stefano ;
Paolacci, Fabrizio ;
Bursi, Oreste S. ;
Dolsek, Matjaz .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2021, 105
[10]   Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines [J].
Cornell, CA ;
Jalayer, F ;
Hamburger, RO ;
Foutch, DA .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 128 (04) :526-533