Landscape composition and pollinator traits interact to influence pollination success in an individual-based model

被引:6
作者
Kortsch, Susanne [1 ]
Saravia, Leonardo [2 ]
Cirtwill, Alyssa R. R. [1 ]
Timberlake, Thomas [3 ]
Memmott, Jane [3 ]
Kendall, Liam [4 ]
Roslin, Tomas [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Strona, Giovanni [5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Fac Agr & Forestry, Spatial Foodweb Ecol Grp, Dept Agr Sci, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Ctr Austral Invest Cient Consejo Nacl Invest Cient, Ushuaia, Argentina
[3] Univ Bristol, Sch Biol Sci, Bristol, England
[4] Lund Univ, Ctr Environm & Climate Sci, Lund, Sweden
[5] Univ Helsinki, Fac Biol & Environm Sci, Organismal & Evolutionary Biol Res Programme, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Swedish Agr Univ, Dept Ecol, Uppsala, Sweden
[7] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Ispra, Italy
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会; 欧洲研究理事会; 美国国家科学基金会; 芬兰科学院;
关键词
agent-based model; habitat heterogeneity; movement ecology; Netlogo; patch size; visitation rate; INTERSPECIFIC POLLEN TRANSFER; BODY-SIZE; CONSEQUENCES; COMPETITION; DIVERSITY; SPEED; BEES;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2435.14353
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The arrangement of plant species within a landscape influences pollination via changes in pollinator movement trajectories and plant-pollinator encounter rates. Yet the combined effects of landscape composition and pollinator traits (especially specialisation) on pollination success remain hard to quantify empirically.We used an individual-based model to explore how landscape and pollinator specialisation (degree) interact to influence pollination. We modelled variation in the landscape by generating gradients of plant species intermixing-from no mixing to complete intermixing. Furthermore, we varied the level of pollinator specialisation by simulating plant-pollinator (six to eight species) networks of different connectance. We then compared the impacts of these drivers on three proxies for pollination: visitation rate, number of consecutive visits to the focal plant species and expected number of plants pollinated.We found that the spatial arrangements of plants and pollinator degree interact to determine pollination success, and that the influence of these drivers on pollination depends on how pollination is estimated. For most pollinators, visitation rate increases in more plant mixed landscapes. Compared to the two more functional measures of pollination, visitation rate overestimates pollination service. This is particularly severe in landscapes with high plant intermixing and for generalist pollinators. Interestingly, visitation rate is less influenced by pollinator traits (pollinator degree and body size) than are the two functional metrics, likely because 'visitation rate' ignores the order in which pollinators visit plants. However, the visitation sequence order is crucial for the expected number of plants pollinated, since only prior visits to conspecific individuals can contribute to pollination. We show here that this order strongly depends on the spatial arrangements of plants, on pollinator traits and on the interaction between them.Taken together, our findings suggest that visitation rate, the most commonly used proxy for pollination in network studies, should be complemented with more functional metrics which reflect the frequency with which individual pollinators revisit the same plant species. Our findings also suggest that measures of landscape structure such as plant intermixing and density-in combination with pollinators' level of specialism-can improve estimates of the probability of pollination.
引用
收藏
页码:2056 / 2071
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] INDISIM-Paracoccus, an individual-based and thermodynamic model for a denitrifying bacterium
    Araujo Granda, Pablo
    Gras, Anna
    Ginovart, Marta
    Moulton, Vincent
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2016, 403 : 45 - 58
  • [32] Modelling population dynamics in mesocosms using an individual-based model coupled to a bioenergetics model
    David, Viviane
    Joachim, Sandrine
    Tebby, Cleo
    Porcher, Jean-Marc
    Beaudouin, Remy
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2019, 398 : 55 - 66
  • [33] Heterozygosity in an Isolated Population of a Large Mammal Founded by Four Individuals Is Predicted by an Individual-Based Genetic Model
    Kekkonen, Jaana
    Wikstrom, Mikael
    Brommer, Jon E.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (09):
  • [34] Condors in space: an individual-based population model for California condor reintroduction planning
    D'Elia, Jesse
    Schumaker, Nathan H.
    Marcot, Bruce G.
    Miewald, Thomas
    Watkins, Sydney
    Yanahan, Alan D.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2022, 37 (05) : 1431 - 1452
  • [35] Calibrating an individual-based movement model to predict functional connectivity for little owls
    Hauenstein, Severin
    Fattebert, Julien
    Gruebler, Martin U.
    Naef-Daenzer, Beat
    Pe'er, Guy
    Hartig, Florian
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2019, 29 (04)
  • [36] A New Individual-Based Model to Simulate Malware Propagation in Wireless Sensor Networks
    Kristel Batista, Farrah
    Martin del Rey, Angel
    Queiruga-Dios, Araceli
    [J]. MATHEMATICS, 2020, 8 (03)
  • [37] Simulation and analysis of an individual-based model for graph-structured plant dynamics
    Campillo, F.
    Champagnat, N.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2012, 234 : 93 - 105
  • [38] Limited cougar recolonization of eastern North America predicted by an individual-based model
    Glass, Thomas W.
    Beausoleil, Richard A.
    Elbroch, L. Mark
    Kertson, Brian N.
    Maletzke, Benjamin T.
    Martins, Quinton
    Matchett, Marc R.
    Vickers, T. Winston
    Wilmers, Christopher C.
    Wittmer, Heiko U.
    Robinson, Hugh
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2024, 298
  • [39] River infrastructure and the spread of freshwater invasive species: Inferences from an experimentally-parameterised individual-based model
    Daniels, Jack A. A.
    Kerr, James R. R.
    Kemp, Paul S. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2023, 60 (06) : 999 - 1009
  • [40] Multi-scale Drivers of Spatial Variation in Old-Growth Forest Carbon Density Disentangled with Lidar and an Individual-Based Landscape Model
    Seidl, Rupert
    Spies, Thomas A.
    Rammer, Werner
    Steel, E. Ashley
    Pabst, Robert J.
    Olsen, Keith
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS, 2012, 15 (08) : 1321 - 1335