Landscape composition and pollinator traits interact to influence pollination success in an individual-based model

被引:6
|
作者
Kortsch, Susanne [1 ]
Saravia, Leonardo [2 ]
Cirtwill, Alyssa R. R. [1 ]
Timberlake, Thomas [3 ]
Memmott, Jane [3 ]
Kendall, Liam [4 ]
Roslin, Tomas [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Strona, Giovanni [5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Fac Agr & Forestry, Spatial Foodweb Ecol Grp, Dept Agr Sci, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Ctr Austral Invest Cient Consejo Nacl Invest Cient, Ushuaia, Argentina
[3] Univ Bristol, Sch Biol Sci, Bristol, England
[4] Lund Univ, Ctr Environm & Climate Sci, Lund, Sweden
[5] Univ Helsinki, Fac Biol & Environm Sci, Organismal & Evolutionary Biol Res Programme, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Swedish Agr Univ, Dept Ecol, Uppsala, Sweden
[7] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Ispra, Italy
基金
芬兰科学院; 英国自然环境研究理事会; 欧洲研究理事会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
agent-based model; habitat heterogeneity; movement ecology; Netlogo; patch size; visitation rate; INTERSPECIFIC POLLEN TRANSFER; BODY-SIZE; CONSEQUENCES; COMPETITION; DIVERSITY; SPEED; BEES;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2435.14353
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The arrangement of plant species within a landscape influences pollination via changes in pollinator movement trajectories and plant-pollinator encounter rates. Yet the combined effects of landscape composition and pollinator traits (especially specialisation) on pollination success remain hard to quantify empirically.We used an individual-based model to explore how landscape and pollinator specialisation (degree) interact to influence pollination. We modelled variation in the landscape by generating gradients of plant species intermixing-from no mixing to complete intermixing. Furthermore, we varied the level of pollinator specialisation by simulating plant-pollinator (six to eight species) networks of different connectance. We then compared the impacts of these drivers on three proxies for pollination: visitation rate, number of consecutive visits to the focal plant species and expected number of plants pollinated.We found that the spatial arrangements of plants and pollinator degree interact to determine pollination success, and that the influence of these drivers on pollination depends on how pollination is estimated. For most pollinators, visitation rate increases in more plant mixed landscapes. Compared to the two more functional measures of pollination, visitation rate overestimates pollination service. This is particularly severe in landscapes with high plant intermixing and for generalist pollinators. Interestingly, visitation rate is less influenced by pollinator traits (pollinator degree and body size) than are the two functional metrics, likely because 'visitation rate' ignores the order in which pollinators visit plants. However, the visitation sequence order is crucial for the expected number of plants pollinated, since only prior visits to conspecific individuals can contribute to pollination. We show here that this order strongly depends on the spatial arrangements of plants, on pollinator traits and on the interaction between them.Taken together, our findings suggest that visitation rate, the most commonly used proxy for pollination in network studies, should be complemented with more functional metrics which reflect the frequency with which individual pollinators revisit the same plant species. Our findings also suggest that measures of landscape structure such as plant intermixing and density-in combination with pollinators' level of specialism-can improve estimates of the probability of pollination.
引用
收藏
页码:2056 / 2071
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Individual-based plant-pollinator networks are structured by phenotypic and microsite plant traits
    Arroyo-Correa, Blanca
    Bartomeus, Ignasi
    Jordano, Pedro
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2021, 109 (08) : 2832 - 2844
  • [2] Scale-dependent effects of landscape structure on pollinator traits, species interactions and pollination success
    Peralta, Guadalupe
    Webber, Christie J.
    Perry, George L. W.
    Stouffer, Daniel B.
    Vazquez, Diego P.
    Tylianakis, Jason M.
    ECOGRAPHY, 2023, 2023 (05)
  • [3] The temporal dimension in individual-based plant pollination networks
    Valverde, Javier
    Maria Gomez, Jose
    Perfectti, Francisco
    OIKOS, 2016, 125 (04) : 468 - 479
  • [4] The individual-based forest landscape and disturbance model iLand: Overview, progress, and outlook
    Rammer, Werner
    Thom, Dominik
    Baumann, Martin
    Braziunas, Kristin
    Dollinger, Christina
    Kerber, Jonas
    Mohr, Johannes
    Seidl, Rupert
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2024, 495
  • [5] Drivers of plant individual-based pollinator visitation network topology in an arid ecosystem
    Braun, Jenna
    Lortie, Christopher J.
    ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2022, 50
  • [6] Hydrological niche segregation of plant functional traits in an individual-based model
    Herberich, Maximiliane Marion
    Gayler, Sebastian
    Anand, Madhur
    Tielboerger, Katja
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2017, 356 : 14 - 24
  • [7] SimAdapt: an individual-based genetic model for simulating landscape management impacts on populations
    Rebaudo, Francois
    Le Rouzic, Arnaud
    Dupas, Stephane
    Silvain, Jean-Francois
    Harry, Myriam
    Dangles, Olivier
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2013, 4 (06): : 595 - 600
  • [8] Pollinator individual-based networks reveal the specialized plant-pollinator mutualism in two biodiverse communities
    Wang, Lin-Lin
    Yang, Yong-Ping
    Duan, Yuan-Wen
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 11 (23): : 17509 - 17518
  • [9] Fragmentation of nest and foraging habitat affects time budgets of solitary bees, their fitness and pollination services, depending on traits: Results from an individual-based model
    Everaars, Jeroen
    Settele, Josef
    Dormann, Carsten F.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (02):
  • [10] An individual-based process model to simulate landscape-scale forest ecosystem dynamics
    Seidl, Rupert
    Rammer, Werner
    Scheller, Robert M.
    Spies, Thomas A.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2012, 231 : 87 - 100