Sustainable intensification and carbon sequestration research in agricultural systems: A systematic review

被引:18
作者
Haughey, E. [1 ,2 ]
Neogi, S. [3 ]
Portugal-Pereira, J. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
van Diemen, R. [6 ]
Slade, R. B. [6 ]
机构
[1] Atlantic Technol Univ Galway, Sch Sci & Comp, Dept Nat Resources & Environm, Dublin Rd, Galway, Ireland
[2] Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Nat Sci, Bot Dept, Dublin 2, Ireland
[3] SustainCERT, Res Dept, Livange, Luxembourg
[4] Univ Fed Rio De Janeiro, Grad Sch Engn, Energy Planning Program, Sala 211 Cidade Univ Ilha Fundao, BR-21941972 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[5] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, IDMEC, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
[6] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Environm Policy, London, England
关键词
Climate change mitigation; Sustainable intensification; Carbon sequestration; Land use policies; Sustainable agriculture; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; AGROFORESTRY; MITIGATION; ADAPTATION; ADOPTION; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2023.02.018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mitigation pathways that stabilise global warming to 1.5 degrees C describe rapidly increasing deployment of landbased solutions, including increased carbon sequestration in soils and biomass. This places additional demands on land, which is also required to provide food security and other ecosystem services. Sustainable Intensification (SI) of agriculture has the potential to facilitate meeting demands for food and fibre, while simultaneously meeting environmental and ecological goals. The scientific literature has most often addressed the challenge of SI separately to climate change mitigation objectives in agricultural systems. Using a systematic review approach, we explored the compatibility of SI and carbon sequestration research through two contrasting case studies: Case Study I on Grassland Agriculture in Europe, and Case Study II on Smallholder Agriculture in Africa. We find contrasting levels of research theme similarity for SI and carbon sequestration, with European grassland agriculture research having lower similarity compared with African smallholder agriculture research. There was a focus on minimising biodiversity loss and environmental impacts in Europe, in contrast to a food security emphasis in Africa, reflecting regional and development differences. While there are clear context and agricultural-system specific differences between both case studies, both suggest that sustainable land use policies can be used to achieve SI integrated with climate mitigation in agriculture.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 23
页数:10
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Agricultural Policy Division, 2013, PROM BIOD SAD STRAT
[2]  
Albert S., 2012, Agriculture Food Security, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.1186/2048-7010-1-2
[3]   International perspectives and trends in research on inclusive education: a systematic review [J].
Amor, Antonio M. ;
Hagiwara, Mayumi ;
Shogren, Karrie A. ;
Thompson, James R. ;
Verdugo, Miguel Angel ;
Burke, Kathryn M. ;
Aguayo, Virginia .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION, 2019, 23 (12) :1277-1295
[4]   Soil carbon sequestration is an elusive climate mitigation tool [J].
Amundson, Ronald ;
Biardeau, Leopold .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (46) :11652-11656
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE 2001, P2
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2021, C PARTIES SERVING M
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Agroforestry
[9]  
Arneth Almut., 2019, Climate change and land: An IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems, P77
[10]   Climate-Smart Practices of Smallholder Farmers in Cameroon Confronted with Climate Variability and Change: The Example of Agroforestry [J].
Awazi, Nyong Princely ;
Tchamba, Martin Ngankam ;
Temgoua, Lucie Felicite .
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (01) :83-96