Opportunity or trap - the policy effect of China's energy quota trading

被引:2
作者
Zhang, Ruohan [1 ]
Wang, Shali [1 ,2 ]
Li, Jingyu [3 ]
Wu, Jiaxi [1 ]
Meng, Zheng [4 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol Beijing, Sch Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Guizhou Univ Engn Sci, Sch Econ & Management, Bijie, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[3] Macau Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Law, Macau, Peoples R China
[4] Shihezi Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shihezi 832000, Xinjiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Energy quota trading; energy policy; triple difference; energy intensity; policy comparison; Q32; Q43; Q48; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; WHITE CERTIFICATES; CONSUMPTION; EFFICIENCY; DECOMPOSITION; SCHEMES; INTENSITY; FRAMEWORK; EMIRATE; PRICES;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2024.2337779
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper assesses the policy effect of the energy quota trading (EQT) policy from the perspectives of energy consumption, economic growth, and energy intensity, based on the panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2006 to 2019. The energy intensity has been decomposed into technical effect and structural effect using the LMDI model. The triple difference method, the corresponding parallel dynamic trend test and the placebo test are employed in this study. The result suggests that the EQT policy is capable of suppressing the growth of energy consumption, and will not dampen economic growth. Moreover, the policy facilitates the decrease of energy intensity in China. The EQT policy has spurred energy technology innovation, improved energy efficiency, and exerted about innovative compensation effects. However, the initial allocation of energy quota is free, thus leading to the structural effect of enterprises converging to high-energy-consumption industries. Compared with the white certificate policy, the EQT policy has some defects in the regulatory mechanism and operating rules. It is imperative for the policymakers to formulate guiding policies when considering the policy shocks of the above low industrialization area on the rapidly developing country.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   China's Energy Policy:Past and Present [J].
史丹 .
China Economist, 2007, (04) :60-68
[42]   On energy equity and China's policy choices [J].
Xu, Shengqing ;
Wang, Tao .
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 28 (03) :288-301
[43]   Linking the emissions trading schemes of Europe and China - Combining climate and energy policy instruments [J].
Yang Liu ;
Taoyuan Wei .
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2016, 21 :135-151
[44]   Linking the emissions trading schemes of Europe and China - Combining climate and energy policy instruments [J].
Liu, Yang ;
Wei, Taoyuan .
MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2016, 21 (02) :135-151
[45]   Optimized Variables for Environmental Dynamics: China's Renewable Energy Policy [J].
Wang, Yujing ;
You, Yanqun ;
Teng, Yu .
FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
[46]   Water markets and water rebounds: China's water rights trading policy [J].
Sheng, Jichuan ;
Zhang, Ruzhu ;
Yang, Hongqiang ;
Chen, Cheng .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2025, 229
[47]   Evaluation of China's carbon emission trading policy from corporate innovation [J].
Lv, Miaochen ;
Bai, Manying .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 39
[48]   China's Energy Transition Policy Expectation and Its CO2 Emission Reduction Effect Assessment [J].
Wang, Di ;
Liu, Xue ;
Yang, Xiaodi ;
Zhang, Zhiyuan ;
Wen, Xinchen ;
Zhao, Yueying .
FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 8
[49]   Estimation of energy saving potential in China's paper industry [J].
Lin, Boqiang ;
Moubarak, Mohamed .
ENERGY, 2014, 65 :182-189
[50]   The incremental construction land differentiated management framework: the perspective of land quota trading in China [J].
Cao, Yu ;
Zhang, Xiaoling ;
Zhang, Xukun ;
Li, Heng .
LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 96