Performance modeling and multi-objective optimization during turning AISI 304 stainless steel using coated and coated-microblasted tools

被引:2
作者
Chinchanikar, Satish [1 ]
Gadge, Mahendra [1 ]
机构
[1] Vishwakarma Inst Informat Technol, Survey 3-4, Pune 411039, Maharashtra, India
来源
OBRABOTKA METALLOV-METAL WORKING AND MATERIAL SCIENCE | 2023年 / 25卷 / 04期
关键词
AISI; 304; Cutting force; Tool life; Coated tools; Surface roughness; Multi-objective optimization; CUTTING PARAMETERS; SPEED; STEEL; WEAR;
D O I
10.17212/1994-6309-2023-25.4-117-135
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
Introduction. High-speed machining of stainless steel has long been a focus of research. Due to characteristics such as low thermal conductivity and work hardening, AISI 304 is considered to be a difficult material to cut. Machinability indicators provide important information about the efficiency and effectiveness of the machining process, enabling manufacturers to optimize their operations for increased productivity and precision. The purpose of the work. Coated carbide tools are most often used for machining AISI 304 stainless steel. Few studies, meanwhile, have examined the effects of pre-and post-treated coated carbide tools when turning these alloys at high speeds. In addition, only a small number of studies have simultaneously optimized the cutting parameters while employing pre -and post-treated tools. The methods of investigation. The present work comparatively evaluates the performance of coated and coated-microblasted tools during the turning of AISI 304 stainless steel. The tools were PVD-AlTiN coated, PVD-AlTiN coated with microblasting as a post-treatment (coated-microblasted), and MTCVD-TiCN/Al2O3 coated (MTCVD). The experimental-based mathematical models were developed to predict and optimize the turning performance. Results and Discussion. In this study, it is found that PVD-AlTiN coated tools have the lowest cutting forces and surface roughness, followed by PVD-AlTiN coated-microblasted and MTCVD-TiCN/Al2O3 coated tools. However, there is no significant difference observed in these responses for coated and coated-microblasted tools. It is found that the cutting forces increased with feed and depth of cut while decreasing with cutting speed. However, this effect is significant for MTCVD-coated tools. On the other hand, higher tool life is observed with MTCVD-TiCN/ Al2O3 coated tools, followed by PVD AlTiN coated-microblasted and PVD-AlTiN coated tools. Tool life was largely affected by cutting speed. However, PVD-AlTiN coated tools exhibited this effect more noticeably. The models, with correlation coefficients found above 0.9, can be utilized to predict responses in turning AISI 304 stainless steel. The optimization study revealed that turning AISI 304 stainless steel with MTCVD-TiCN/Al2O3 coated tools incurs lower cutting forces of 18-27 N, produces a minimum surface roughness of 0.3-0.44 mu m, and has a better tool life of 36-51 min compared to PVD-AlTiN coated (C) and PVD-AlTiN coated-microblasted (CMB) tools.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 135
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Surface integrity investigation and multi-objective optimization in high-speed cutting of AISI 304 stainless steel for dry cutting and MQCL conditions [J].
Wang, Yinzhi ;
Zheng, Chengli ;
Liu, Niancong ;
Wu, Long ;
Chen, Yun .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART B-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MANUFACTURE, 2023, 237 (12) :1880-1892
[32]   Modeling and multi-objective optimization for minimizing surface roughness, cutting force, and power, and maximizing productivity for tempered stainless steel AISI 420 in turning operations [J].
Zerti, Abderrahmen ;
Yallese, Mohamed Athmane ;
Meddour, Ikhlas ;
Belhadi, Salim ;
Haddad, Abdelkrim ;
Mabrouki, Tarek .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 102 (1-4) :135-157
[33]   Modeling and multi-objective optimization for minimizing surface roughness, cutting force, and power, and maximizing productivity for tempered stainless steel AISI 420 in turning operations [J].
Abderrahmen Zerti ;
Mohamed Athmane Yallese ;
Ikhlas Meddour ;
Salim Belhadi ;
Abdelkrim Haddad ;
Tarek Mabrouki .
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2019, 102 :135-157
[34]   Multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters for turning AISI 52100 hardened steel [J].
R. Serra ;
H. Chibane ;
A. Duchosal .
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018, 99 :2025-2034
[35]   Multi-Response Optimization During Dry Turning of Bio-implant Steel (AISI 316L) Using Coated Carbide Inserts [J].
Singh, Amarjit ;
Sinha, Manoj Kumar .
ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 45 (11) :9397-9411
[36]   A Study on Drilling of AISI 304L Stainless Steel with Nanocomposite-Coated Drill Tools [J].
Alper Uysal .
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2014, 39 :8279-8285
[37]   Tool Wear, Surface Topography, and Multi-Objective Optimization of Cutting Parameters during Machining AISI 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel Flange [J].
Li, Xiaojun ;
Liu, Zhanqiang ;
Liang, Xiaoliang .
METALS, 2019, 9 (09)
[38]   Analysis and Multi-Objective Optimization for Reducing Energy Consumption and Improving Surface Quality during Dry Machining of 304 Stainless Steel [J].
Du, Feilong ;
He, Lin ;
Huang, Haisong ;
Zhou, Tao ;
Wu, Jinxing .
MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (21) :1-26
[39]   Dry turning of tempered martensitic stainless tool steel using coated cermet and coated carbide tools [J].
Noordin, M. Y. ;
Venkatesh, V. C. ;
Sharif, S. .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 185 (1-3) :83-90
[40]   Multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters to minimize power consumption in dry turning of stainless steel 316 [J].
Bagaber, Salem Abdullah ;
Yusoff, Ahmed Razlan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 157 :30-46