A comparative analysis of form and function in Centrarchidae hearing ability: Does otolith variation affect auditory responsiveness?

被引:3
作者
Bendig, Taylor A. [1 ]
Dycha, Grace M. [1 ]
Bull, Elise M. [1 ,2 ]
Ayala-Osorio, Roselia [1 ]
Higgs, Dennis M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Windsor, Fac Sci, Integrat Biol, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Mississauga, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
SOUND DETECTION; INNER EARS; SULCUS ACUSTICUS; FISH; NOISE; POTENTIALS; DIVERSITY; SYSTEMS; PISCES; RATIO;
D O I
10.1121/10.0020587
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
There exists a wealth of knowledge on hearing ability in individual fish species, but the role of interspecific variation, and drivers behind it, remains understudied, making it difficult to understand evolutionary drivers. The current study quantified hearing thresholds for three species of sunfish in the family Centrarchidae [bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus), pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus), and rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris)] using auditory evoked potentials and behavioral trials and saccular otolith size and hair cell density. In auditory physiological experiments, 10-ms tone bursts were played and responses monitored to measure hearing. In behavioral experiments, fish were exposed to the same tone bursts for 1 s, and changes in fish behaviors were monitored. Saccular otolith morphology and hair cell densities were also quantified. Physiological thresholds varied between species, but behavioral thresholds did not. Rock bass had larger S:O ratio (percentage of the saccular otolith surface occupied by the sulcus), but no differences in hair cell densities were found. Our study allows for a direct comparison between confamilial species, allowing a deeper understanding of sound detection abilities and possible mechanisms driving differential hearing. Using both approaches also allows future research into how these species may be impacted by increasing levels of anthropogenic noise.
引用
收藏
页码:772 / 780
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Are hearing sensitivities of freshwater fish adapted to the ambient noise in their habitats? [J].
Amoser, S ;
Ladich, F .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2005, 208 (18) :3533-3542
[2]   CHANGES IN THE RATIO OF THE SULCUS ACUSTICUS AREA TO THE SAGITTA AREA OF POMATOSCHISTUS-MINUTUS AND P-LOZANOI (PISCES, GOBIIDAE) [J].
ARELLANO, RV ;
HAMERLYNCK, O ;
VINCX, M ;
MEES, J ;
HOSTENS, K ;
GIJSELINCK, W .
MARINE BIOLOGY, 1995, 122 (03) :355-360
[3]  
BERRA TimM., 2001, FRESHWATER FISH DIST
[4]   Otolith Analyses Highlight Morpho-Functional Differences of Three Species of Mullet (Mugilidae) from Transitional Water [J].
D'Iglio, Claudio ;
Natale, Sabrina ;
Albano, Marco ;
Savoca, Serena ;
Famulari, Sergio ;
Gervasi, Claudio ;
Lanteri, Giovanni ;
Panarello, Giuseppe ;
Spano, Nunziacarla ;
Capillo, Gioele .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (01)
[5]   Evolution of hearing in vertebrates: the inner ears and processing [J].
Fay, RR ;
Popper, AN .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2000, 149 (1-2) :1-10
[6]  
FAY RR, 1983, HEARING RES, V10, P69, DOI 10.1016/0378-5955(83)90018-7
[7]   The effects of stimulus parameters on auditory evoked potentials of Carassius auratus [J].
Garabon, Jessica R. ;
Higgs, Dennis M. .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 203 (11) :945-951
[8]   FUNCTION, FORM AND TIME-KEEPING PROPERTIES OF FISH OTOLITHS [J].
GAULDIE, RW .
COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY A-PHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 91 (02) :395-402
[9]  
Hawkins A.D., 1981, HEARING SOUND COMMUN, P109, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-7186-5_6
[10]   The contribution of the lateral line to 'hearing' in fish [J].
Higgs, D. M. ;
Radford, C. A. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2013, 216 (08) :1484-1490