Evaluation and Comparison of Impact Strength and Transverse Strength of Heat Polymerized Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Denture Base Resin Repaired Using Heat Polymerizied PMMA Denture Base Resin, Auto-Polymerized PMMA Resin and A New Light Polymerizied Denture Resin: An In Vitro Study

被引:1
作者
Ajmal, Mohammed B. [1 ]
Kushalappa, Dhyan P. B. [2 ]
Ahamed, Saadath Afzaa S. [3 ]
Kaur, Manpreet [4 ]
Shetty, Akshay [1 ]
Minz, Manisha [5 ]
Saleem, Mohammed C. [1 ]
Raheel, Syed A. [6 ]
机构
[1] KGF Coll Dent Sci, Dept Prosthodont, Kolar, Karnataka, India
[2] Kodagu Inst Med Sci & Teaching Hosp, Dept Dent, Madekeri, Karnataka, India
[3] Sri Rajiv Gandhi Coll Dent Sci & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont Crown Bridge & Implantol, Bangalore, India
[4] Kodagu Dist Hosp, Dept Dent, Madikeri, Karnataka, India
[5] Govt Dent Coll, Dept Prosthodont, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
[6] KGF Coll Dent Sci, Dept Oral Med & Radiol, Kolar, Karnataka, India
关键词
Denture repair; impact strength; transverse strength; FRACTURE;
D O I
10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_101_23
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Context: Repaired denture prosthesisdemands adequate transverse and impact strength. A new repairdenture base resin- "Lukafix" require to fulfil these criteria. Aims: This study evaluates and compares the transverse and impact strength of heat polymerizing, auto polymerizing and LUKAfix denture resin. Methods and Material: 20 specimens were control(without repair), and other were test specimens which were fractured and repaired with heat polymerized PMMA resin, chemically polymerized PMMA resin and LUKAfix light polymerizing denture resin. Each group wasdivided in two subgroups. Subgroup A was subjected to transverse strength test and subgroup B to impact strength test. Statistical Analysis Used: One way ANOVA was used to identify the mean difference among the four groups. Post-Hoc-Bonferroni was done to observe the difference between the groups. Results: Maximum transverse strength was observed in specimens repaired with heat polymerized (48.33 +/- 9.19) and least in LUKAfix denture resin (6.56 +/- 1.15). Also, impact strength was maximum for heat polymerized (3.64 +/- 0.41) followed by LUKAfix denture resin (2.34 +/- 0.44). Conclusions:Repair with LUKAfix denture resin resulted inferior transverse and impact strength as compared to heat polymerized PMMA resin.
引用
收藏
页码:S706 / S710
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Al Taie GA, 2009, J BAGH COLL DENT, V21, P30
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, 1791 ISO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, 15671999 ISO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, LUKAFIX LIGHT CUR DE
[5]   In vitro comparison of two different materials for the repair of urethan dimethacrylate denture bases [J].
Cilingir, Altug ;
Bilhan, Hakan ;
Geckili, Onur ;
Sulun, Tonguc ;
Bozdag, Ergun ;
Sunbuloglu, Emin .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2013, 5 (04) :396-401
[6]   DENTURE FRACTURE - A SURVEY [J].
DARBAR, UR ;
HUGGETT, R ;
HARRISON, A .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1994, 176 (09) :342-345
[7]   An evaluation of self-cured and visible light-cured denture base materials when used as a denture base repair material [J].
DarOdeh, NS ;
Harrison, A ;
AbuHammad, O .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1997, 24 (10) :755-760
[8]   THE TRANSVERSE STRENGTHS OF 3 DENTURE BASE RESINS [J].
DIXON, DL ;
EKSTRAND, KG ;
BREEDING, LC .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1991, 66 (04) :510-513
[9]   Strength of Denture Base Resins Repaired with Auto- and Visible Light-Polymerized Materials [J].
Faot, Fernanda ;
da Silva, Wander Jose ;
da Rosa, Rosena Santos ;
Cury, Altair A. Del Bel ;
Matheus Rodrigues Garcia, Renata Cunha .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2009, 18 (06) :496-502
[10]  
Lukafix, ROS 3X3GR SPRITZ