Income inequality, productivity, and international trade

被引:2
作者
Hsu, Wen-Tai [1 ]
Lu, Lin [2 ]
Picard, Pierre M. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Acad Sinica, Inst Econ, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Chinese Econ Practice & Thinking, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Luxembourg, Dept Econ & Management, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[4] Catholic Univ Louvain, LIDAM CORE, Ottignies, Belgium
关键词
Trade; Income heterogeneity; Product quality; Mean-preserving spread; Selection; Aggregate productivity; STRUCTURAL-CHANGE; MARKET-SIZE; GROWTH; DEMAND; MARKUPS; GAINS; TECHNOLOGY; QUALITY; PRICES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00199-022-01456-y
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper studies the effect of income inequality on selection and aggregate productivity in a general equilibrium model with non-homothetic preferences and product quality. The model matches the empirical fact that an increase in income shifts one's consumption towards goods that have higher quality both at the intensive and extensive margins. It also implies a negative relationship between the number and quantity of goods consumed by an income group and the earnings of other income groups. The central result is that a mean-preserving spread of the income distribution negatively affects aggregate productivity through the softening of firms' selection. In the presence of international trade, this effect is amplified with lower trade barriers or a larger number of trade partners. Furthermore, the model implies that the domestic expenditure shares and welfare gains from trade are constant across income groups. A simple quantitative exercise suggests that an income redistribution like the one induced by the US Federal taxes and transfers raises average productivity by about 3%.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 249
页数:47
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Acemoglu D, 2002, J ECON LIT, V40, P7
[2]   Inequality and economic growth:: The perspective of the new growth theories [J].
Aghion, P ;
Caroli, E ;
García-Peñalosa, C .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 1999, 37 (04) :1615-1660
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, OECD Economic Outlook, V2016
[4]   The Elusive Pro-Competitive Effects of Trade [J].
Arkolakis, Costas ;
Costinot, Arnaud ;
Donaldson, Dave ;
Rodriguez-Clare, Andrs .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2019, 86 (01) :46-80
[5]   New Trade Models, Same Old Gains? [J].
Arkolakis, Costas ;
Costinot, Arnaud ;
Rodriguez-Clare, Andres .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) :94-130
[6]   Top Incomes in the Long Run of History [J].
Atkinson, Anthony B. ;
Piketty, Thomas ;
Saez, Emmanuel .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2011, 49 (01) :3-71
[7]   Globalization and individual gains from trade [J].
Behrens, Kristian ;
Murata, Yasusada .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2012, 59 (08) :703-720
[8]  
Behrens Kristian., 2014, Market size, entrepreneurship, and income inequality
[9]   Redistribution, inequality, and growth: new evidence [J].
Berg, Andrew ;
Ostry, Jonathan D. ;
Tsangarides, Charalambos G. ;
Yakhshilikov, Yorbol .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2018, 23 (03) :259-305
[10]   Implications of skill-biased technological change: International evidence [J].
Berman, E ;
Bound, J ;
Machin, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1998, 113 (04) :1245-1279