Multi-objective building energy system optimization considering EV infrastructure

被引:34
作者
Park, Musik [1 ]
Wang, Zhiyuan [1 ]
Li, Lanyu [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Xiaonan [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, 4 Engn Dr 4, Singapore 117585, Singapore
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
Renewable energy; Energy system optimization; Zero Energy Building; Electric vehicle; EnergyPlus; PASSIVE DESIGN STRATEGIES; COST; METHODOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; GENERATION; EMISSIONS; STORAGE; DEMAND; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120504
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
With increasing concerns over carbon dioxide emissions, the concept of Zero Energy Building (ZEB) has emerged. Electric Vehicles (EVs) are also considered environmentally friendly since they reduce greenhouse gas emissions, with a rapidly growing market. With these global trends of increasing EV amount and infrastructure, building energy systems should incorporate the ZEB concept and the increasing electricity requirements for EV charging. However, it is unclear how EV charging demand can affect building energy system design while aligning with ZEB requirements. Therefore, this paper develops a new framework to find the optimal energy system design that meets EV charging demand and ZEB requirements. The charging demand for EVs is predicted by the machine learning model, which combines the building energy demand from EnergyPlus. Ultimately, the Genetic Algo-rithm and PROBID method are applied to optimize the Total Annual Cost (TAC) and Self-Energy Sufficiency Ratio. EV charging demand has been found to affect energy system design, especially in small-size buildings. Using the proposed method, the building owner can determine the optimal capacity of an energy system based on economic and ZEB conditions, contributing to the future net ZEB and transportation systems.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 80 条
[41]   Zero Energy Building - A review of definitions and calculation methodologies [J].
Marszal, A. J. ;
Heiselberg, P. ;
Bourrelle, J. S. ;
Musall, E. ;
Voss, K. ;
Sartori, I. ;
Napolitano, A. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2011, 43 (04) :971-979
[42]   Towards a Future Scenario for Offshore Wind Energy in Chile: Breaking the Paradigm [J].
Mattar, Cristian ;
Cabello-Espanon, Felipe ;
Alonso-de-Linaje, Nicolas G. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (13)
[43]   Design of distributed energy systems under uncertainty: A two-stage stochastic programming approach [J].
Mavromatidis, Georgios ;
Orehounig, Kristina ;
Carmeliet, Jan .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 222 :932-950
[44]   Economic analysis of fuel cell installations at commercial buildings including regional pricing and complementary technologies [J].
McLarty, Dustin ;
Brouwer, Jack ;
Ainscough, Chris .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2016, 113 :112-122
[45]   GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE AND GREENHOUSE EFFECT [J].
Mikhaylov, Alexey ;
Moiseev, Nikita ;
Aleshin, Kirill ;
Burkhardt, Thomas .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES, 2020, 7 (04) :2897-2913
[46]  
Ministry of Environment, REG OP CARB POINT SY
[47]  
Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport, 2050 CARB NEUTR ROAD
[48]  
Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport., ANN GREEN BUILD REV
[49]  
Ministry of Trade Industry and Energy, 2020, METH EXP GAS COOL SU
[50]   Multi-operation management of a typical micro-grids using Particle Swarm Optimization: A comparative study [J].
Moghaddam, Amjad Anvari ;
Seifi, Alireza ;
Niknam, Taher .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (02) :1268-1281