The equalizing effect of teacher dashboards on feedback in K-12 classrooms

被引:30
作者
Knoop-van Campen, Carolien A. N. [1 ]
Wise, Alyssa [2 ]
Molenaar, Inge [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Behav Sci Inst, Montessorilaan 3, NL-6525 HR Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] NYU Steinhardt, Learning Analyt Res Network LEARN, New York, NY USA
关键词
Teacher dashboards; adaptive learning technology; feedback; K-12; ability levels; learning analytics; LEARNING ANALYTICS; ACHIEVEMENT; PERCEPTIONS; INSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1080/10494820.2021.1931346
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Teacher dashboards provide real-time information about students' performance and progress, which help K-12 teachers to adjust feedback to student' specific needs during learning. Prior research indicated two problems with respect to how teachers provide feedback: (i) teachers do not always select the most effective feedback to support student' learning and (ii) feedback is not allocated equally to students with different abilities. Specifically, process feedback is considered most effective yet is relatively scarce. In order to understand how dashboards influence the type and allocation of feedback, we compared characteristics of feedback given after dashboard consultation (dashboard-prompted feedback) to feedback triggered by teachers themselves or in response to students' questions (human-prompted feedback) in thirty-five K-12 classrooms. Results showed that dashboards led to equal amounts of task and process feedback, while human-prompts led to much more task than process feedback and this difference was especially large for low-ability students. Hence the different types of dashboard-prompted feedback were more equally distributed among students of different ability levels. These results indicate that dashboards can have an important equalizing effect on teacher feedback practices.
引用
收藏
页码:3447 / 3463
页数:17
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   A FOLLOW-UP OF FOLLOW THROUGH - THE LATER EFFECTS OF THE DIRECT INSTRUCTION MODEL ON CHILDREN IN 5TH AND 6TH GRADES [J].
BECKER, WC ;
GERSTEN, R .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 1982, 19 (01) :75-92
[2]   Formative assessment: a critical review [J].
Bennett, Randy .
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2011, 18 (01) :5-25
[3]   Open Learner Models and Learning Analytics Dashboards: A Systematic Review [J].
Bodily, Robert ;
Kay, Judy ;
Aleven, Vincent ;
Jivet, Ioana ;
Davis, Dan ;
Xhakaj, Franceska ;
Verbert, Katrien .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LEARNING ANALYTICS & KNOWLEDGE (LAK'18): TOWARDS USER-CENTRED LEARNING ANALYTICS, 2018, :41-50
[4]  
Brookhart S.M., 2008, How to give effective feedback to your students
[5]   A Matrix of Feedback for Learning [J].
Brooks, Cameron ;
Carroll, Annemaree ;
Gillies, Robyn ;
Hattie, John .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (04) :14-32
[6]   FEEDBACK AND SELF-REGULATED LEARNING - A THEORETICAL SYNTHESIS [J].
BUTLER, DL ;
WINNE, PH .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1995, 65 (03) :245-281
[7]   HOW TO SEE THE CLASSROOM THROUGH THE EYES OF A TEACHER: CONSISTENCY BETWEEN PERCEPTIONS ON DIVERSITY AND DIFFERENTIATION PRACTICES [J].
Civitillo, Sauro ;
Denessen, Eddie ;
Molenaar, Inge .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS, 2016, 16 :587-591
[8]  
CLARIANA RB, 1990, J COMPUT-BASE INSTR, V17, P125
[9]  
Clark W., 2013, What the Research Says: iPads in the Classroom
[10]   On teaching adaptively [J].
Corno, Lyn .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2008, 43 (03) :161-173