Ocean-driven interannual variability in atmospheric CO2 quantified using OCO-2 observations and atmospheric transport simulations

被引:1
作者
Guan, Yifan [1 ]
McKinley, Galen A. [2 ,3 ]
Fay, Amanda R. [3 ]
Doney, Scott C. [4 ]
Keppel-Aleks, Gretchen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Climate & Space Sci & Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, New York, NY USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Lamont Doherty Earth Observ, Palisades, NY USA
[4] Univ Virginia, Dept Environm Sci, Charlottesville, VA USA
关键词
carbon cycle; OCO-2; interannual variability; CO2; ocean-atmosphere interaction; ORBITING CARBON OBSERVATORY-2; RETRIEVAL ALGORITHM; SURFACE OCEAN; DIOXIDE; PCO(2); CHEMISTRY; TRENDS; FLUXES; MODEL; LAND;
D O I
10.3389/fmars.2024.1272415
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Interannual variability (IAV) in the atmospheric CO2 growth rate is caused by variation in the balance between uptake by land and ocean and accumulation of anthropogenic emissions in the atmosphere. While variations in terrestrial fluxes are thought to drive most of the observed atmospheric CO2 IAV, the ability to characterize ocean impacts has been limited by the fact that most sites in the surface CO2 monitoring network are located on coasts or islands or within the continental interior. NASA's Orbiting Carbon-Observatory 2 (OCO-2) mission has observed the atmospheric total column carbon dioxide mole fraction (XCO2) from space since September 2014. With a near-global coverage, this dataset provides a first opportunity to directly observe IAV in atmospheric CO2 over remote ocean regions. We assess the impact of ocean flux IAV on the OCO-2 record using atmospheric transport simulations with underlying gridded air-sea CO2 fluxes from observation-based products. We use three observation-based products to bracket the likely range of ocean air-sea flux contributions to XCO2 variability (over both land and ocean) within the GEOS-Chem atmospheric transport model. We find that the magnitude of XCO2 IAV generated by the whole ocean is between 0.08-0.12 ppm throughout the world. Depending on location and flux product, between 20-80% of the IAV in the simulations is caused by IAV in air-sea CO2 fluxes, with the remainder due to IAV in atmospheric winds, which modulate the atmospheric gradients that arise from climatological ocean fluxes. The Southern Hemisphere mid-latitudes and low-latitudes are the dominant ocean regions in generating the XCO2 IAV globally. The simulation results based on all three flux products show that even within the Northern Hemisphere atmosphere, Southern Hemisphere ocean fluxes are the dominant source of variability in XCO2. Nevertheless, the small magnitude of the air-sea flux impacts on XCO2 presents a substantial challenge for detection of ocean-driven IAV from OCO-2. Although the IAV amplitude arising from ocean fluxes and transport is 20 to 50% of the total observed XCO2 IAV amplitude of 0.4 to 1.6 ppm in the Southern Hemisphere and the tropics, ocean-driven IAV represents only 10% of the observed amplitude in the Northern Hemisphere. We find that for all three products, the simulated ocean-driven XCO2 IAV is weakly anti-correlated with OCO-2 observations, although these correlations are not statistically significant (p>0.05), suggesting that even over ocean basins, terrestrial IAV obscures the ocean signal.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Increase in observed net carbon dioxide uptake by land and oceans during the past 50 years
    Ballantyne, A. P.
    Alden, C. B.
    Miller, J. B.
    Tans, P. P.
    White, J. W. C.
    [J]. NATURE, 2012, 488 (7409) : 70 - +
  • [2] Variability in the Global Ocean Carbon Sink From 1959 to 2020 by Correcting Models With Observations
    Bennington, Val
    Gloege, Lucas
    McKinley, Galen A.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 49 (14)
  • [3] Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and evaluation
    Bey, I
    Jacob, DJ
    Yantosca, RM
    Logan, JA
    Field, BD
    Fiore, AM
    Li, QB
    Liu, HGY
    Mickley, LJ
    Schultz, MG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2001, 106 (D19) : 23073 - 23095
  • [4] Computation and analysis of atmospheric carbon dioxide annual mean growth rates from satellite observations during 2003-2016
    Buchwitz, Michael
    Reuter, Maximilian
    Schneising, Oliver
    Noel, Stefan
    Gier, Bettina
    Bovensmann, Heinrich
    Burrows, John P.
    Boesch, Hartmut
    Anand, Jasdeep
    Parker, Robert J.
    Somkuti, Peter
    Detmers, Rob G.
    Hasekamp, Otto P.
    Aben, Ilse
    Butz, Andre
    Kuze, Akihiko
    Suto, Hiroshi
    Yoshida, Yukio
    Crisp, David
    O'Dell, Christopher
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2018, 18 (23) : 17355 - 17370
  • [5] Influence of El Nino on atmospheric CO2 over the tropical Pacific Ocean: Findings from NASA's OCO-2 mission
    Chatterjee, A.
    Gierach, M. M.
    Sutton, A. J.
    Feely, R. A.
    Crisp, D.
    Eldering, A.
    Gunson, M. R.
    O'Dell, C. W.
    Stephens, B. B.
    Schimel, D. S.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2017, 358 (6360)
  • [6] The ACOS CO2 retrieval algorithm - Part II: Global XCO2 data characterization
    Crisp, D.
    Fisher, B. M.
    O'Dell, C.
    Frankenberg, C.
    Basilio, R.
    Boesch, H.
    Brown, L. R.
    Castano, R.
    Connor, B.
    Deutscher, N. M.
    Eldering, A.
    Griffith, D.
    Gunson, M.
    Kuze, A.
    Mandrake, L.
    McDuffie, J.
    Messerschmidt, J.
    Miller, C. E.
    Morino, I.
    Natraj, V.
    Notholt, J.
    O'Brien, D. M.
    Oyafuso, F.
    Polonsky, I.
    Robinson, J.
    Salawitch, R.
    Sherlock, V.
    Smyth, M.
    Suto, H.
    Taylor, T. E.
    Thompson, D. R.
    Wennberg, P. O.
    Wunch, D.
    Yung, Y. L.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2012, 5 (04) : 687 - 707
  • [7] How Well Do We Understand the Land-Ocean-Atmosphere Carbon Cycle?
    Crisp, David
    Dolman, Han
    Tanhua, Toste
    McKinley, Galen A.
    Hauck, Judith
    Bastos, Ana
    Sitch, Stephen
    Eggleston, Simon
    Aich, Valentin
    [J]. REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2022, 60 (02)
  • [8] The on-orbit performance of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) instrument and its radiometrically calibrated products
    Crisp, David
    Pollock, Harold R.
    Rosenberg, Robert
    Chapsky, Lars
    Lee, Richard A. M.
    Oyafuso, Fabiano A.
    Frankenberg, Christian
    O'Dell, Christopher W.
    Bruegge, Carol J.
    Doran, Gary B.
    Eldering, Annmarie
    Fisher, Brendan M.
    Fu, Dejian
    Gunson, Michael R.
    Mandrake, Lukas
    Osterman, Gregory B.
    Schwandner, Florian M.
    Sun, Kang
    Taylor, Tommy E.
    Wennberg, Paul O.
    Wunch, Debra
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2017, 10 (01) : 59 - 81
  • [9] LSCE-FFNN-v1: a two-step neural network model for the reconstruction of surface ocean pCO2 over the global ocean
    Denvil-Sommer, Anna
    Gehlen, Marion
    Vrac, Mathieu
    Mejia, Carlos
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 12 (05) : 2091 - 2105
  • [10] Ocean Acidification: The Other CO2 Problem
    Doney, Scott C.
    Fabry, Victoria J.
    Feely, Richard A.
    Kleypas, Joan A.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2009, 1 : 169 - 192