What Drives Opposition to Social Rights for Immigrants? Clarifying the Role of Psychological Predispositions

被引:1
作者
Knotz, Carlo M. [1 ,6 ]
Taylor, Alyssa M. [2 ]
Gandenberger, Mia K. [3 ,4 ]
Chueri, Juliana [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger, Dept Media & Social Sci, Stavanger, Norway
[2] Univ Lausanne, Swiss Grad Sch Publ Adm IDHEAP, Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Univ Neuchatel, Swiss Forum Migrat & Populat Studies, Neuchatel, Switzerland
[4] Univ Neuchatel, NCCR Move, Neuchatel, Switzerland
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Polit Sci & Publ Adm, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Stavanger, Dept Media & Social Sci, N-4036 Stavanger, Norway
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
immigration; IAT; authoritarianism; ethnocentrism; social dominance orientation; IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST; DOMINANCE ORIENTATION; WELFARE CHAUVINISM; BIG-5; PERSONALITY; SELF-ESTEEM; ATTITUDES; SUPPORT; DESERVINGNESS; AUTHORITARIANISM; PREJUDICE;
D O I
10.1177/00323217241228456
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Why do people oppose granting social rights to immigrants? Previous research indicates that psychological predispositions such as authoritarianism or ethnocentrism are strong drivers, but our understanding of their roles is still incomplete. This is in part because studies have not yet systematically tested different psychological variables against other, but also in part because some other potentially important predispositions such as implicit bias and social dominance orientation have so far been overlooked. We address this gap using original data from survey experiments conducted in six countries (Denmark, Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States). We find consistent effects of ethnocentrism and social dominance orientation, a less robust effect of authoritarianism and no effect of implicit bias. In substantive terms, we find that a belief in ethnocentric stereotypes and a desire for dominance are the central factors driving opposition to immigrants' social rights.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 125
页数:25
相关论文
共 83 条
[51]   Deserving and Undeserving Welfare Claimants in Britain and the Netherlands: Examining the Role of Ethnicity and Migration Status Using a Vignette Experiment [J].
Kootstra, Anouk .
EUROPEAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2016, 32 (03) :325-338
[52]  
Kuhfeld W., 2010, Marketing research methods in SAS
[54]   The institutional logic of welfare attitudes - How welfare regimes influence public support [J].
Larsen, Christian Albrekt .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2008, 41 (02) :145-168
[56]  
Leeper TJ., 2021, margins: Marginal Effects for Model Objects
[57]   Who Decides When The Party Doesn't? Authoritarian Voters and the Rise of Donald Trump [J].
MacWilliams, Matthew C. .
PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, 2016, 49 (04) :716-721
[58]   Do right-wing parties foster welfare chauvinistic attitudes? A longitudinal study of the 2015 'refugee crisis' in Germany [J].
Marx, Paul ;
Naumann, Elias .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2018, 52 :111-116
[59]  
McCrae R.R., 1999, HDB PERSONALITY, V2nd, P139, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-0763-5_
[60]   Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation [J].
Nosek, BA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2005, 134 (04) :565-584