What Drives Opposition to Social Rights for Immigrants? Clarifying the Role of Psychological Predispositions

被引:1
作者
Knotz, Carlo M. [1 ,6 ]
Taylor, Alyssa M. [2 ]
Gandenberger, Mia K. [3 ,4 ]
Chueri, Juliana [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger, Dept Media & Social Sci, Stavanger, Norway
[2] Univ Lausanne, Swiss Grad Sch Publ Adm IDHEAP, Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Univ Neuchatel, Swiss Forum Migrat & Populat Studies, Neuchatel, Switzerland
[4] Univ Neuchatel, NCCR Move, Neuchatel, Switzerland
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Polit Sci & Publ Adm, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Stavanger, Dept Media & Social Sci, N-4036 Stavanger, Norway
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
immigration; IAT; authoritarianism; ethnocentrism; social dominance orientation; IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST; DOMINANCE ORIENTATION; WELFARE CHAUVINISM; BIG-5; PERSONALITY; SELF-ESTEEM; ATTITUDES; SUPPORT; DESERVINGNESS; AUTHORITARIANISM; PREJUDICE;
D O I
10.1177/00323217241228456
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Why do people oppose granting social rights to immigrants? Previous research indicates that psychological predispositions such as authoritarianism or ethnocentrism are strong drivers, but our understanding of their roles is still incomplete. This is in part because studies have not yet systematically tested different psychological variables against other, but also in part because some other potentially important predispositions such as implicit bias and social dominance orientation have so far been overlooked. We address this gap using original data from survey experiments conducted in six countries (Denmark, Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States). We find consistent effects of ethnocentrism and social dominance orientation, a less robust effect of authoritarianism and no effect of implicit bias. In substantive terms, we find that a belief in ethnocentric stereotypes and a desire for dominance are the central factors driving opposition to immigrants' social rights.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 125
页数:25
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   Ingroup bias and self-esteem: A meta-analysis [J].
Aberson, CL ;
Healy, M ;
Romero, V .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2000, 4 (02) :157-173
[2]   The ideological roots of the support for welfare state reform: Support for distributive and commodifying reform in The Netherlands [J].
Achterberg, Peter ;
van derVeen, Romke ;
Raven, Judith .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE, 2014, 23 (02) :215-226
[3]   STRUCTURAL-CHANGES AND NEW CLEAVAGES - THE PROGRESS PARTIES IN DENMARK AND NORWAY [J].
ANDERSEN, JG ;
BJORKLUND, T .
ACTA SOCIOLOGICA, 1990, 33 (03) :195-217
[4]   Attributions of implicit prejudice, or "would Jesse Jackson 'fail' the implicit association test?" [J].
Arkes, HR ;
Tetlock, PE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 2004, 15 (04) :257-278
[5]  
Auspurg K., 2014, FACTORIAL SURVEY EXP, V175
[6]  
Banaji MR, 2001, SCI CON SER, P117
[7]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[8]  
Bonoli G., 2023, POLICY POLITICS
[9]  
Bonoli G., 2023, WELFARE SOLIDARITY M
[10]  
BRAMBOR T, 2006, POLIT ANAL, V14