Multi-objective waste load allocation: application to Delhi stretch of the river Yamuna, India

被引:0
|
作者
Parmar, Dipteek [1 ]
Keshari, Ashok K. [2 ]
机构
[1] HB Technol Inst, Dept Civil Engn, Kanpur 208002, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, New Delhi 110016, India
关键词
waste load allocation; WLA; multi-objective; equity; assimilative capacity; effluent; decision maker; India; WATER-QUALITY MANAGEMENT; SIMULATED ANNEALING ALGORITHM; POLLUTION-CONTROL; OPTIMIZATION; MODEL; BASIN;
D O I
10.1504/IJEWM.2023.133274
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Waste load allocation (WLA) models are developed as multi-objective models with conflicting objectives in terms of cost, equity and assimilative capacity. A total of four models consisting of one single and three multi-objective waste load allocation models are formulated. These are: 1) least cost model (LCM); 2) cost-equity model (CEM); 3) cost-assimilative capacity model (CAM); 4) cost-equity-assimilative capacity model (CEAM). The performance of these models is demonstrated on the 22 km long Delhi stretch of the river Yamuna, India. Optimal solutions of the models are obtained using the web-based interactive NIMBUS software. The cost functions in the optimisation models are developed as power functions of BOD removal using the regression module of the SPSS10 (1999) software. The response of waste loads on the water quality is quantified in terms of transfer coefficient calculated using the QUAL2E water quality simulation model. The results reveal that amongst all the models, LCM achieves the best practical solutions. In fact, LCM and CAM yields more or less similar results. The CEM does not yield very practical and optimal solution.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 151
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Demand Forecast and Multi-Objective Ambulance Allocation
    Tsai, Yihjia
    Chang, Kuan-Wu
    Yiang, Giou-Teng
    Lin, Hwei-Jen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PATTERN RECOGNITION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 32 (07)
  • [22] Application of multi-objective particle swarm optimization to solve a fuzzy multi-objective reliability redundancy allocation problem
    Ebrahimipour, V.
    Sheikhalishahi, M.
    2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (SYSCON 2011), 2011, : 326 - 333
  • [23] Integrated waste load allocation for river water pollution control under uncertainty: a case study of Tuojiang River, China
    Xu, Jiuping
    Hou, Shuhua
    Yao, Liming
    Li, Chaozhi
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2017, 24 (21) : 17741 - 17759
  • [24] Pharmaceutical Active Compounds Contamination and Seasonal-Based Ecotoxicity Assessment of the Yamuna River for the Delhi stretch
    Alsubih, Majed
    Khan, Roohul Abad
    ROCZNIK OCHRONA SRODOWISKA, 2024, 26 : 587 - 602
  • [25] A Fair Approach for Multi-Objective Water Resources Allocation
    Tian, Jing
    Guo, Shenglian
    Liu, Dedi
    Pan, Zhengke
    Hong, Xingjun
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2019, 33 (10) : 3633 - 3653
  • [26] Development of water quality management strategies for an urban river reach: A case study of the river Yamuna, Delhi, India
    Nibedita Verma
    Geeta Singh
    Naved Ahsan
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2022, 15 (24)
  • [27] Study on the Optimization of Multi-Objective Water Resources Allocation in the Henan Yellow River Water Supply Zone
    Li, Yanbin
    Sun, Ke
    Men, Ruyi
    Wang, Fei
    Li, Daoxi
    Han, Yuhang
    Qu, Yanping
    WATER, 2023, 15 (22)
  • [28] A multi-objective approach for intermodal train load planning
    Heggen, Hilde
    Braekers, Kris
    Caris, An
    OR SPECTRUM, 2018, 40 (02) : 341 - 366
  • [29] The Use of River Flow Discharge and Sediment Load for Multi-Objective Calibration of SWAT Based on the Bayesian Inference
    Cheng, Qin-Bo
    Chen, Xi
    Wang, Jiao
    Zhang, Zhi-Cai
    Zhang, Run-Run
    Xie, Yong-Yu
    Reinhardt-Imjela, Christian
    Schulte, Achim
    WATER, 2018, 10 (11)
  • [30] Inexact Chance-Constrained Waste-Load Allocation Model for Water Quality Management of Xiangxihe River
    Du, P.
    Li, Y. P.
    Huang, G. H.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 139 (09) : 1178 - 1197