State updating in a distributed hydrological model by ensemble Kalman filtering with error estimation

被引:15
作者
Gong, Junfu [1 ,2 ]
Weerts, Albrecht H. [2 ,3 ]
Yao, Cheng [1 ]
Li, Zhijia [1 ]
Huang, Yingchun [1 ,4 ]
Chen, Yuanfang [1 ]
Chang, Yifei [5 ]
Huang, Pengnian [6 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Hydrol & Water Resources, Nanjing 210024, Peoples R China
[2] Deltares, NL-2600 MH Delft, Netherlands
[3] Wageningen Univ, Hydrol & Quantitat Water Management Grp, NL-6700 HB Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Fuzhou Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Fuzhou 350108, Peoples R China
[5] Shaanxi Prov Inst Water Resources & Elect Power In, Xian 710001, Peoples R China
[6] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Hydrol & Water Resources, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Flood; Hydrological assimilation; Ensemble Kalman filtering; Maximum a posteriori estimation; Distributed hydrological model; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS; DATA ASSIMILATION; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; CHECK DAMS; VARIATIONAL ASSIMILATION; UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATION; PREDICTION; STREAMFLOW; CLIMATE; SCHEME;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129450
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
For flood simulation in small-and medium-sized catchments, discharge observations may be used to update model states of a distributed hydrological model to improve performance. The ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) has been widely used for hydrological assimilation due to its relative simplicity and robustness. An advantage of the EnKF is that it is easy to include different sources of uncertainty, therefore the choice of error model is crucial for the application of the EnKF assimilation. This paper describes an EnKF assimilation scheme for estimating error models using the maximum a posteriori estimation method (MAP). We test this scheme in two small and medium-sized catchments in China with different characteristics, and in addition compared the performance differences under two kinds of rainfall forcing. We show that MAP is beneficial in specifying error models and providing reliable ensemble spread. The assimilation scheme can effectively ameliorate the degradation of distributed hydrological model performance due to uncalibrated model parameters and/or poor quality of input data.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 118 条
[1]   An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction [J].
Ajami, Newsha K. ;
Duan, Qingyun ;
Sorooshian, Soroosh .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2007, 43 (01)
[2]   Improving operational flood ensemble prediction by the assimilation of satellite soil moisture: comparison between lumped and semi-distributed schemes [J].
Alvarez-Garreton, C. ;
Ryu, D. ;
Western, A. W. ;
Su, C. -H. ;
Crow, W. T. ;
Robertson, D. E. ;
Leahy, C. .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2015, 19 (04) :1659-1676
[3]   THE FORMAL DEFINITION OF REFERENCE PRIORS [J].
Berger, James O. ;
Bernardo, Jose M. ;
Sun, Dongchu .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2009, 37 (02) :905-938
[4]   PROPHECY, REALITY AND UNCERTAINTY IN DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODELING [J].
BEVEN, K .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 1993, 16 (01) :41-51
[5]   THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION [J].
BEVEN, K ;
BINLEY, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) :279-298
[6]  
Beven K.J., 1985, HYDROLOGICAL FORECAS
[7]  
Beven K, 2014, APPLIED UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS FOR FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, P25
[8]   Historical climatology in Europe -: The state of the art [J].
Brázdil, R ;
Pfister, C ;
Wanner, H ;
Von Storch, H ;
Luterbacher, J .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2005, 70 (03) :363-430
[9]  
Brier G. W., 1950, Mon. Weather Rev., V78, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1950)0782.0.CO
[10]  
2, DOI 10.1175/15200493]